mike
Well-known member
@happy_tiger said in [Tigers should be heavyweights](/post/1237014) said:@Geo said in [Tigers should be heavyweights](/post/1236998) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Tigers should be heavyweights](/post/1236990) said:@mike said in [Tigers should be heavyweights](/post/1236988) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Tigers should be heavyweights](/post/1236987) said:@mike said in [Tigers should be heavyweights](/post/1236985) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Tigers should be heavyweights](/post/1236978) said:@gallagher said in [Tigers should be heavyweights](/post/1236973) said:@fibrodreaming said in [Tigers should be heavyweights](/post/1236949) said:@Tcat said in [Tigers should be heavyweights](/post/1236927) said:Justin has done alot of good but his allowance for Ivan to have free reign over recruitment and $$ is a sackable offense in my mind.
That would have been the Board's decision. A CEO would not have the authority to take that decision.
My god it sounds like he's responsible for nothing. I think CEO is the wrong title.
It appears he's solely responsible for all the good stuff but has nothing to do with any of the bad stuff.
He’s made mistakes for sure but one thing he is not responsible for is the players in the playing group. That is the purview of the Board and the Coach. Pascoe would know very little about players abilities.
Nor would I, but if I was CEO and someone came to me with a range of contracts i'd be asking them if there were any competing offers and what we're paying them compared to their previous contract. Wasn't it reported that Reynolds and Packer's offer from us was almost double their offer from their old clubs? If he's this financial whiz everyone says, wouldn't that raise alarm bells?
It depends what his instructions were from the Board.
So what is the point of him then? Is he just a figurehead?
Mostly..
Yes..he would be part of the 'team'' in terms of recruitment but power of veto is always with the board especially where large contracts are concerned..
A CEO may well be against a signing a coach wants with all the due diligence that entails..if the board is backing the coach with what he requires would carry more weight..
You can use the Dragons as an example where the Coach is not given the power over the roster ..in the end that cost him the job with a committee in the end that was selecting the team week to week..
What does a GEO do
Guest Executive Officer?