Wests Tigers appoint two new Assistant Coaches

[the_third]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.


unless we finish dead last

That wouldn't change my opinion on this issue.

its a great club decision...

 

[Snake]

2 assistants that have been around Maguire for years … so much for a new start and fresh ideas , no threats here for the coach ! Just seems the easy options always at the Tigers ..

 

[frullens]

Really happy with today's announcement.

Think Gardiner and Cayless will be great.

Both younger so will relate to our players.
Gardiner already has relstuonship with the younger crew through nsw cup.
Cayless will have respect as ex nrl player and have pacific connection.

Also both have existing relationship and experience with madge so can hit the ground running.

Hopefully both can bring new ideas.

Now big question. Who is defensive coach?

 

[needsanewusername]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

 

[cochise]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

 

[needsanewusername]

Now big question. Who is defensive coach?

Whoever takes that poison chalice on has their work cutout.
Techniques and attitudes re; defence are subpar for most in our squad.

 

[needsanewusername]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

 

[cochise]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

It is 100% the point, Flanagan is a risk to the health of players. I am very pleased he wasn't employed.

 

[needsanewusername]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

It is 100% the point, Flanagan is a risk to the health of players. I am very pleased he wasn't employed.

It’s not the point.
You proudly boast that irrespective of how these new coaches go, we’ve made the correct decision. I said that remains to be seen.
Going off on tangents about possibilities is fantasy only. For all you and I know, Flanno may have been the missing piece to a tilt at the premiership.
See, I can do it as well.

 

[cochise]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

It is 100% the point, Flanagan is a risk to the health of players. I am very pleased he wasn't employed.

It’s not the point.
You proudly boast that irrespective of how these new coaches go, we’ve made the correct decision. I said that remains to be seen.
Going off on tangents about possibilities is fantasy only. For all you and I know, Flanno may have been the missing piece to a tilt at the premiership.
See, I can do it as well.

I don't care if he is the missing piece to a premiership, it is still the right choice, that is the point. It doesn't remain to be seen because I don't care what difference he could have made.

 

[needsanewusername]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

It is 100% the point, Flanagan is a risk to the health of players. I am very pleased he wasn't employed.

It’s not the point.
You proudly boast that irrespective of how these new coaches go, we’ve made the correct decision. I said that remains to be seen.
Going off on tangents about possibilities is fantasy only. For all you and I know, Flanno may have been the missing piece to a tilt at the premiership.
See, I can do it as well.

I don't care if he is the missing piece to a premiership, it is still the right choice, that is the point. It doesn't remain to be seen because I don't care what difference he could have made.

Ok so what you are saying is it’s only your opinion on this matter that counts?
IMO talking in absolutes about future occurrences is the height of arrogance and ignorance.

 

[cochise]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

It is 100% the point, Flanagan is a risk to the health of players. I am very pleased he wasn't employed.

It’s not the point.
You proudly boast that irrespective of how these new coaches go, we’ve made the correct decision. I said that remains to be seen.
Going off on tangents about possibilities is fantasy only. For all you and I know, Flanno may have been the missing piece to a tilt at the premiership.
See, I can do it as well.

I don't care if he is the missing piece to a premiership, it is still the right choice, that is the point. It doesn't remain to be seen because I don't care what difference he could have made.

Ok so what you are saying is it’s only your opinion on this matter that counts?
IMO talking in absolutes about future occurrences is the height of arrogance and ignorance.

I'm talking about his past actions, I don't want him anywhere near our players, based on those actions, that is my opinion, I am entitled to state it. I think the club made the right decision. I am not happy for the club I support to put winning football games over the players health in this regard.

 

[Tigerwould]

Was Cayless the defence coach at the Roosters this year?

 

[needsanewusername]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

It is 100% the point, Flanagan is a risk to the health of players. I am very pleased he wasn't employed.

It’s not the point.
You proudly boast that irrespective of how these new coaches go, we’ve made the correct decision. I said that remains to be seen.
Going off on tangents about possibilities is fantasy only. For all you and I know, Flanno may have been the missing piece to a tilt at the premiership.
See, I can do it as well.

I don't care if he is the missing piece to a premiership, it is still the right choice, that is the point. It doesn't remain to be seen because I don't care what difference he could have made.

Ok so what you are saying is it’s only your opinion on this matter that counts?
IMO talking in absolutes about future occurrences is the height of arrogance and ignorance.

I'm talking about his past actions, I don't want him anywhere near our players, based on those actions, that is my opinion, I am entitled to state it. I think the club made the right decision. I am not happy for the club I support to put winning football games over the players health in this regard.

Yes that is your opinion and yes you are entitled to state it.
MY opinion was that it is not a cut and dried outcome. There are grey areas and it remains to be seen whether the club has gone down the correct path. I am entitled to this opinion but you have dismissed it as incorrect even though you have nothing but your opinion as currency.
This is the point I am arguing and the point you are dodging.

 

[Tiger-ferret]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

It is 100% the point, Flanagan is a risk to the health of players. I am very pleased he wasn't employed.

It’s not the point.
You proudly boast that irrespective of how these new coaches go, we’ve made the correct decision. I said that remains to be seen.
Going off on tangents about possibilities is fantasy only. For all you and I know, Flanno may have been the missing piece to a tilt at the premiership.
See, I can do it as well.

I don't care if he is the missing piece to a premiership, it is still the right choice, that is the point. It doesn't remain to be seen because I don't care what difference he could have made.

Ok so what you are saying is it’s only your opinion on this matter that counts?
IMO talking in absolutes about future occurrences is the height of arrogance and ignorance.

IMO it’s not win at all costs.

 

[needsanewusername]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

It is 100% the point, Flanagan is a risk to the health of players. I am very pleased he wasn't employed.

It’s not the point.
You proudly boast that irrespective of how these new coaches go, we’ve made the correct decision. I said that remains to be seen.
Going off on tangents about possibilities is fantasy only. For all you and I know, Flanno may have been the missing piece to a tilt at the premiership.
See, I can do it as well.

I don't care if he is the missing piece to a premiership, it is still the right choice, that is the point. It doesn't remain to be seen because I don't care what difference he could have made.

Ok so what you are saying is it’s only your opinion on this matter that counts?
IMO talking in absolutes about future occurrences is the height of arrogance and ignorance.

IMO it’s not win at all costs.

Win at all costs? Do you really think he would have doped our players?

 

[Tiger-ferret]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

It is 100% the point, Flanagan is a risk to the health of players. I am very pleased he wasn't employed.

It’s not the point.
You proudly boast that irrespective of how these new coaches go, we’ve made the correct decision. I said that remains to be seen.
Going off on tangents about possibilities is fantasy only. For all you and I know, Flanno may have been the missing piece to a tilt at the premiership.
See, I can do it as well.

I don't care if he is the missing piece to a premiership, it is still the right choice, that is the point. It doesn't remain to be seen because I don't care what difference he could have made.

Ok so what you are saying is it’s only your opinion on this matter that counts?
IMO talking in absolutes about future occurrences is the height of arrogance and ignorance.

IMO it’s not win at all costs.

Win at all costs? Do you really think he would have doped our players?

Dunno. He might have turned a new leaf.Do you let a known pedophile talk to your kid? There’s no proof they’ll do anything in the future.

 

[needsanewusername]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

It is 100% the point, Flanagan is a risk to the health of players. I am very pleased he wasn't employed.

It’s not the point.
You proudly boast that irrespective of how these new coaches go, we’ve made the correct decision. I said that remains to be seen.
Going off on tangents about possibilities is fantasy only. For all you and I know, Flanno may have been the missing piece to a tilt at the premiership.
See, I can do it as well.

I don't care if he is the missing piece to a premiership, it is still the right choice, that is the point. It doesn't remain to be seen because I don't care what difference he could have made.

Ok so what you are saying is it’s only your opinion on this matter that counts?
IMO talking in absolutes about future occurrences is the height of arrogance and ignorance.

IMO it’s not win at all costs.

Win at all costs? Do you really think he would have doped our players?

Dunno. He might have turned a new leaf.Do you let a known pedophile talk to your kid? There’s no proof they’ll do anything in the future.

That’s not a good analogy.

 

[WT2K]

Was Cayless the defence coach at the Roosters this year?

Fitzgibbon according to a few roosters fans I've seen talking about it on Reddit and Twitter today.

 

[cochise]

Very happy we didn’t appoint Flanagan. He probably is better than Gardiner and Cayless in experience wise, plus his credentials show that. Looking forward to seeing what next season holds for both lads.

You are very happy we didn’t appoint him because he is better than these two?

I'm very happy we didn't appoint him because he is a drug cheat.

Maybe so but he is what we needed.

I don't believe in risking the health of our players.

You have zero evidence that would be the case

Happened before

Leopards, spots and all that?

What has he done to show that he has changed? Has he accepted responsibility? Admitted fault?

I don’t care

Neither do I because we made the right decision to keep him away from our players.

Remains to be seen.
For now colour me sceptical.

Doesn't remain to be seen because regardless of what happens going forward we made the right decision.

You have no way of qualifying, nor quantifying that presently.

Yes I do, we didn't employ someone who was a risk to our players health, that is the right decision in my opinion regardless of our results moving forward.

Exactly. It is your opinion only.
This is why I said “it remains to be seen”. That is a fact and it trumps your opinion.

There is no fact that can Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon maintaining a safe environment for your players.

That is not the point we are discussing.

It is 100% the point, Flanagan is a risk to the health of players. I am very pleased he wasn't employed.

It’s not the point.
You proudly boast that irrespective of how these new coaches go, we’ve made the correct decision. I said that remains to be seen.
Going off on tangents about possibilities is fantasy only. For all you and I know, Flanno may have been the missing piece to a tilt at the premiership.
See, I can do it as well.

I don't care if he is the missing piece to a premiership, it is still the right choice, that is the point. It doesn't remain to be seen because I don't care what difference he could have made.

Ok so what you are saying is it’s only your opinion on this matter that counts?
IMO talking in absolutes about future occurrences is the height of arrogance and ignorance.

I'm talking about his past actions, I don't want him anywhere near our players, based on those actions, that is my opinion, I am entitled to state it. I think the club made the right decision. I am not happy for the club I support to put winning football games over the players health in this regard.

Yes that is your opinion and yes you are entitled to state it.
MY opinion was that it is not a cut and dried outcome. There are grey areas and it remains to be seen whether the club has gone down the correct path. I am entitled to this opinion but you have dismissed it as incorrect even though you have nothing but your opinion as currency.
This is the point I am arguing and the point you are dodging.

Yes, I am dismissing your opinion, I don't agree with it and consider it wrong. That is ok mate, people don't have to agree on everything but I am 100% concrete in my opinion on this subject, there is nothing that can happen in the future that will change that. We can run last the next 3 years and that won't change my opinion on Flanagan.

You may call that arrogant but I just have strong beliefs around drugs in sport.

You are entitled to your opinion, I just completely disagree.