happy_tiger
Well-known member
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:…and we would still be paying him. I'd rather he be making the effort to get back on the park.
Let him be paid to mentor off the field and see out his contract but not take a place in the top 25\. Under the circumstances I think the club has a valid case with the NRL.
I just don't get some on here
A poster tells us our biggest metre eater and skipper could be out for a few weeks and some continue to argue about the veracity of an injured player's contract and whether we should retire or not
If he's out he's out, what's to comment on? Here's my all important take on that situation (if it's the case) - "Well that's not good." Happy? Can the Earth start moving again?
Well seeing you are actually commenting in the WT's v Melbourne thread ,and seeing today is actual Game Day , Woods being in or out is far bigger news than whether Ballins contract is being paid for fully by Manly ,partially by Manly , partially by the WT's or fully by the WT's