You’re fired!

[Russell]

So we're all happy with Matulino making just over 50m two weeks in a row now?
Ok

17\. Sue - 47 metres in attack, 5 runs, 22 tackles

13\. Taylor - 14 metres in attack, 3 runs, 57 tackles

10\. Matulino - 51 metres in attack, 5 runs, 24 tackles

12\. Rochow - 18 metres in attack, 3 runs, 30 tackles

8\. Eisenhuth - 31 metres in attack, 4 runs, 34 tackles

You are obviously happy with the other 4 or is it just hate Matulino?

 

[Geo]

Pretty good stats for a hooker who missed 10mins…

 

[Fibros]

So we're all happy with Matulino making just over 50m two weeks in a row now?
Ok

Reading this comment I put it down to… You are actually Tim Grant.

Lets say I am right... Tim, you are gonski. You won't be at Wests next year... You will maybe be picked up by Parra and screamed at by a little girl call Moses when you get lazy in cover defence.

 

[Fibros]

So we're all happy with Matulino making just over 50m two weeks in a row now?
Ok

17\. Sue - 47 metres in attack, 5 runs, 22 tackles

13\. Taylor - 14 metres in attack, 3 runs, 57 tackles

10\. Matulino - 51 metres in attack, 5 runs, 24 tackles

12\. Rochow - 18 metres in attack, 3 runs, 30 tackles

8\. Eisenhuth - 31 metres in attack, 4 runs, 34 tackles

You are obviously happy with the other 4 or is it just hate Matulino?

Thank you Russell… Also to add to this Mats stats this year are the best of any front rower at Wests.

 

[Tim Sheens]

So we're all happy with Matulino making just over 50m two weeks in a row now?
Ok

17\. Sue - 47 metres in attack, 5 runs, 22 tackles

13\. Taylor - 14 metres in attack, 3 runs, 57 tackles

10\. Matulino - 51 metres in attack, 5 runs, 24 tackles

12\. Rochow - 18 metres in attack, 3 runs, 30 tackles

8\. Eisenhuth - 31 metres in attack, 4 runs, 34 tackles

You are obviously happy with the other 4 or is it just hate Matulino?

Thank you Russell… Also to add to this Mats stats this year are the best of any front rower at Wests.

He was okay last night and worked well from marker, notably on the player that would otherwise have strolled through if not for Godinet taking the intercept. He is rightly far from the chopping block.

 

[TIGER]

So we're all happy with Matulino making just over 50m two weeks in a row now?
Ok

17\. Sue - 47 metres in attack, 5 runs, 22 tackles

13\. Taylor - 14 metres in attack, 3 runs, 57 tackles

10\. Matulino - 51 metres in attack, 5 runs, 24 tackles

12\. Rochow - 18 metres in attack, 3 runs, 30 tackles

8\. Eisenhuth - 31 metres in attack, 4 runs, 34 tackles

You are obviously happy with the other 4 or is it just hate Matulino?

No I think the rest were terrible also, my expectations of them are just lower.

Eiso is not a prop and is still cutting his teeth

Rochow is probably lucky to find himself in the NRL in the first place and has probably been overachieving without being great.

Sue is Sue, not expecting much and like Rochow is lucky to be playing in the top grade.

Taylor is Taylor makes heaps of tackles and offers zero elsewhere.
Does an individual need to make 60 tackles a game and leave nothing for the other 50% of the game?
Does he understand football consists of 50% attack?

I expected more from Matulino, 50m from your experienced prop two weeks in a row isn't good enough.

Let me ask you a question.
Who is our leader in the forward pack?

 

[Geo]

Taylor played hooker yesterday..and ran for more M than Cammy did today which was 3m ..Cammy did cop one in the nads tho…

 

[TIGER]

Taylor played hooker yesterday..and ran for more M than Cammy did today which was 3m ..Cammy did cop one in the nads tho…

You're helping build my case for me now.
If he didn't have some sort of utility value he probably doesn't make any sides 17.
He's David Stagg 2.0

 

[Donald_Trump]

Eisenhuth needs time in ISP. Give Felise a go.

 

[larrycorowa]

I love the discussion about dropping wingers etc. when you miss 40-50 tackles and lose the ruck

 

[happy_tiger]

Taylor played hooker yesterday..and ran for more M than Cammy did today which was 3m ..Cammy did cop one in the nads tho…

You're helping build my case for me now.
If he didn't have some sort of utility value he probably doesn't make any sides 17.
He's David Stagg 2.0

Sorry I get confused easily these days

Is that the same David Stagg who played 206 NRL games , won a premiership and played SOO v Qld ??

 

[larrycorowa]

It’s hard to make metres when you don’t have the ball

 

[Russell]

So we're all happy with Matulino making just over 50m two weeks in a row now?
Ok

17\. Sue - 47 metres in attack, 5 runs, 22 tackles

13\. Taylor - 14 metres in attack, 3 runs, 57 tackles

10\. Matulino - 51 metres in attack, 5 runs, 24 tackles

12\. Rochow - 18 metres in attack, 3 runs, 30 tackles

8\. Eisenhuth - 31 metres in attack, 4 runs, 34 tackles

You are obviously happy with the other 4 or is it just hate Matulino?

No I think the rest were terrible also, my expectations of them are just lower.

Eiso is not a prop and is still cutting his teeth

Rochow is probably lucky to find himself in the NRL in the first place and has probably been overachieving without being great.

Sue is Sue, not expecting much and like Rochow is lucky to be playing in the top grade.

Taylor is Taylor makes heaps of tackles and offers zero elsewhere.
Does an individual need to make 60 tackles a game and leave nothing for the other 50% of the game?
Does he understand football consists of 50% attack?

I expected more from Matulino, 50m from your experienced prop two weeks in a row isn't good enough.

Let me ask you a question.
Who is our leader in the forward pack?

"Unread post by larrycorowa » Mon May 07, 2018 8:34 am

It’s hard to make metres when you don’t have the ball"

larrycorowa is correct above but don't worry about little things like that.

I assume Taylor would have been the leader as he is one of the five leaders and Rowdy was off the field after 4 minutes.

See where your coming from - I won't say Matulino as there is no evidence that he was the leader - you are gong to say "well 51 metres is not good enough for your forward leader."

Let me ask you a question.
Is 51 metres good enough without the ball? Or should he have grabbed another from the ball boy? Lol