I have a problem with looking for a 'development' coach. Essentially, NRL coaches need to win games, you give them a year or two grace but they have to fashion a winning team out of what they have. If that's developing youngsters and playing them in first grade then that's good if it leads to winning, but if the youngsters are no good you need to find another way to win. So you hire a coach to win and if they're not they get sacked.
So what sort of criteria is the search for a development coach going to lead to? To me, you want coaches involved in development and bringing youngsters in, but that job is primarily for someone else.
I think Sheens should be in charge of development, working in coordination with the coach. Sheens does know good players. I think the coach should be in charge of winning, or with strategies to get us winning in a year or two. long term plans don't work because no one is patient enough to see it out. With Madge, it always felt like 2023 was going to be the year we judge him, and we never got there. He was patient and has quietly developed quite a young base squad with salary cap room to move, but he gets sacked before getting the benefit of it.
Maybe he was a part of the problem, but I deeply regret the club not giving him a chance to at least coach with some talent next year.
So no to a development coach, get one who wins.