tigerballs
Well-known member
What a stupid explanation.Because unlike 2005 and 2011, we were favourites to win the title in 2012 and completely shat the bed, resulting in Sheens getting the punt after being extended the year previous.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a stupid explanation.Because unlike 2005 and 2011, we were favourites to win the title in 2012 and completely shat the bed, resulting in Sheens getting the punt after being extended the year previous.
Sheens is a student of the game and an innovator. His 2005 style of footy imo is readily adaptable to the game today. In addition, with Marshall, Farah and Funer he has three capable Lieutenants to implement the style of footy he wants to play. What I am pretty sure of is we won't see five hit-ups and the bomb which is Maguire's legacy.Sounds just like our new coach.
And 4 of those hit ups were from the back 3...🙂Sheens is a student of the game and an innovator. His 2005 style of footy imo is readily adaptable to the game today. In addition, with Marshall, Farah and Funer he has three capable Lieutenants to implement the style of footy he wants to play. What I am pretty sure of is we won't see five hit-ups and the bomb which is Maguire's legacy.
A little revisionist, 5 hit ups and a bomb started with Taylor and we couldn't shake it from there. Happy to see the back of it.Sheens is a student of the game and an innovator. His 2005 style of footy imo is readily adaptable to the game today. In addition, with Marshall, Farah and Funer he has three capable Lieutenants to implement the style of footy he wants to play. What I am pretty sure of is we won't see five hit-ups and the bomb which is Maguire's legacy.
Well you asked what I would declare a pathetic question.What a stupid explanation.
Yes I agree that the ball will see a lot more air.Sheens is a student of the game and an innovator. His 2005 style of footy imo is readily adaptable to the game today. In addition, with Marshall, Farah and Funer he has three capable Lieutenants to implement the style of footy he wants to play. What I am pretty sure of is we won't see five hit-ups and the bomb which is Maguire's legacy.
Furner and Farah's involvement suggests defence is a priority.Yes I agree that the ball will see a lot more air.
Without focus on defence though, his 2005 style won’t adapt as you expect it to.
I don’t think we have the backline to thrust Sheens into walking on water territory?Sheens has gone from a washed up retired coach to the coaching messiah on here.
All before coaching a game. Some feat.
I’ll wait until I see results on the field.
You're a pathetic wannabe troll. Can't even do that properly. I asked why people were focussing on 2012 rather than 2005 or 2011. The correct answer would be because they are miserable losers who would prefer to focus on negatives rather than positives, similar to yourself. Do yourself a favour and give yourself another uppercut.Well you asked what I would declare a pathetic question.
People are focusing on 2012 for extremely obvious reasons. Reasons you would know if you followed the sport longer than a couple of years.
I explained it clearly to you, without attacking your fundamental lack of knowledge.
Considering your ridiculous response, I am now stating that if you are too dumb or thick to understand it, maybe ask a grownup around you to help. It’s not that complicated.
Sheens has gone from a washed up retired coach to the coaching messiah on here.
All before coaching a game. Some feat.
I’ll wait until I see results on the field.
You forgot to mention HAPPY NEW YEAR!You're a pathetic wannabe troll. Can't even do that properly. I asked why people were focussing on 2012 rather than 2005 or 2011. The correct answer would be because they are miserable losers who would prefer to focus on negatives rather than positives, similar to yourself. Do yourself a favour and give yourself another uppercut.
Gee they are starting the Wests Tigers bashing nice & early. 😐From The Australian paper, Rothfields comments below.
SHOOSH
● The relationship between one NRL chairman and his chief executive is at breaking point. Only one will survive the season.
● Huge pressure on the once invincible 2GB Continuous Call team in the ratings, with the ABC closing in on Saturdays and Triple M on Sundays. Trying to be funny doesn’t always work. Sometimes it can get stale. Listeners these days want to be informed. They want strong opinions and analysis.
● Drama at the Wests Tigers between Tim Sheens, Benji and Robbie.
● Everyone is talking about Anthony Griffin, Adam O’Brien and Justin Holbrook being under the pump. You can throw Kevvie Walters into that group as well. He needs to make the finals.
● Which huuuge-name NRL player will be offered an early release from his contract?
That's terrible news mateFor what it’s worth , spoke my friend who plays 1st grade , can’t name him , he has the same manager as Nathan brown, he said he was pretty sure brown has signed with the tigers . I guess we will fine out in the next couple of days
Why is he washed up age is just a number he is one of the greatest coaches of all time he has changed the way the game has been played on many occasions he loves the game I think he is chopping at the bit to coach again and change the game again I think season 23 the Tigers will play some fantastic football also some terrible football as well and season 24 the team will have a crack at winning the premiership the young forwards the Tigers have in 24 will shine I honestly think the Tigers have 4 young forwards who will play origin at some stage I am just hoping they are still at the Tiger's when they doSheens has gone from a washed up retired coach to the coaching messiah on here.
All before coaching a game. Some feat.
I’ll wait until I see results on the field.
Intelligent reply ....WOW
BOO F#€kn HOO