Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

What’s ironic about that zero tackle article is that Jack Blyth, the author of it, is widely known on Twitter for his intense criticisms of Wests Tigers that he will take any chance he can get.

Absolutely ran us into the ground last season, yet here is he claiming that 5 of the players we let go are the best signings for other clubs. It’s laughable when you understand the context behind it.

He is also rating Klemmer above Papali’i and Koroisau who is widely regarded as the games premier hooker.

What a noob.
 
Earl said:
It's done mate. Lot's of clubs end up with dodgy contracts. We've had heaps heaps worse in my opinion.

Let's just see what happens. It's a very different team.

AD could come on. I honestly thought last year he would make the 6 spot his own and I reckon he was pretty poor. He is on a good contract as well. He'd be one of our highest paid players now.
Click to expand...
He was the Forums pin-up boy, especially with the anti Brooks brigade, then Hastings got the mantle. They were both overrated , but the sheep got on board, and the media feed off the sheep.
Brooks wasn't great, but neither were these two. That's why the club tried to buy a good half'.
This has been gone over more times then the global warming debate.
 
Tigerwould said:
I don't think you can compare the NRL to a normal work place.
Click to expand...
Whilst I acknowledge your point, there are differences but it’s still a privately owned business and many of the same rules apply.
Would love to see KPIs for all levels ( which I’m sure are in place). Then we could see what expectations the club has.
Won’t happen, but interesting for this old, company GM/ Board Member for over 20 years to speculate.
 
Fingers83 said:
What’s ironic about that zero tackle article is that Jack Blyth, the author of it, is widely known on Twitter for his intense criticisms of Wests Tigers that he will take any chance he can get.

Absolutely ran us into the ground last season, yet here is he claiming that 5 of the players we let go are the best signings for other clubs. It’s laughable when you understand the context behind it.

He is also rating Klemmer above Papali’i and Koroisau who is widely regarded as the games premier hooker.

What a noob.
Click to expand...
I used to read zero tackle quite a bit. About 5, maybe more, years ago until that Blyth guy became one of their main writers. With each article he wrote I thought this bloke has no idea. Got to the point where I no longer read anything written there.
 
Last edited:
twentyforty said:
Spot on! I imagine the less appealing clubs would also have a similar struggle with signing sponsors who may be needed to sign TPAs with players?
Click to expand...
But there's one intention of the cap you've both missed. While I agree that the system wasn't intended to level the salaries of all players (especially marquees), nor equal the appeal of all clubs as a destination, it definitely was intended to put a ceiling on the budget of all clubs and, therefore, spread the talent more evenly. By having a cap, clubs were being asked to balance their expenditure carefully and make astute decisions about which players they keep or let go. However, even to the causal observer, it is obvious that certain clubs are rorting the cap by using TPAs in their salary structures in order to fudge the figures presented to the NRL. This cheating, reduces the chance of a level playing field, in terms of talent, and, therefore, flouts the the main intention of the cap. And all of this is ignored when it is happening right under our administration's nose.
 
Camel2281 said:
It's like any workplace though. If you are doing your job as well as or better than the next bloke, and said next bloke is on double your salary, you'd be asking for substantially more coin

Brooks is the example because he's the highest paid guy at the club.
Click to expand...
Of course the problem started when Brooks was paid way overs as reward for his Dally M Halfback of the Year award. To be paying him over a million a year is unconscionable! This then created a ripple effect in Doueihi's mind, thinking, as the Tigers main attacking threat, he deserves a salary that is comparable. Net result - two grossly inflated paychecks!
 
tony soprano said:
2012 was definitely a stinker year.

Most of us would not remember in detail how the season panned out.

I was watching a game recently and the squad looked unbalanced and not very strong particularly the forward pack.

Losing tedesco didn't help but I think there was a lot of movement in the pack which could be the main reason for the demise.
Click to expand...
do you mean loosing Tedesco to injury?

From memory we were weaker up front. Chris Heighington > Adam Blair IMHO but they are very different players.
Chris H seemed to put a solid effort in, get 60 supercoach points and really was just a solid front rower.

Adam Blair was a battering ram, stays in his position and puts a heavy hit when he can.

Sheens wanted to roll the dice and try something different. Chris H was covering for a lot upfront and that cover was missed.
 
crazycat said:
do you mean loosing Tedesco to injury?

From memory we were weaker up front. Chris Heighington > Adam Blair IMHO but they are very different players.
Chris H seemed to put a solid effort in, get 60 supercoach points and really was just a solid front rower.

Adam Blair was a battering ram, stays in his position and puts a heavy hit when he can.

Sheens wanted to roll the dice and try something different. Chris H was covering for a lot upfront and that cover was missed.
Click to expand...

Yeh mate tedesco did his acl on debute in 2012.

Yeh have to agree don't know where sheens was going with the forward pack in 2012. Although when we left we did loose a lot of good juniors. Tetola, Brown, ect.. who knows.
 
gregjm87 said:
I used to read zero tackle quite a bit. About 5, maybe more, that Blyth guy became one of their main writers. With each article he wrote I thought this bloke has no idea. Got to the point where I no longer read anything written there.
Click to expand...
Yes, absolutely agree. He has little to no idea about the sport he is writing about.

There are some good writers there, but there's no real ground breaking stories, first releases or anything exclusive. He is about as bad as Rothfield in that his agendas are glaringly clear and he doesn't have the professional nous to restrain himself.
 
jirskyr said:
There will never be a capitalist paradigm where all parties have the same purchasing and selling power, even under ideal starting conditions.

The salary cap was never intended to equalise the salaries of top players, nor equalise the appeal of all clubs. If that's what you hoped for then you've totally misunderstood how the salary cap operates.

I argue the salary cap does indeed force clubs to pay market value for players - the players themselves will accept no less. But "less appealing" clubs have to pay above market value for those same players.
Click to expand...
The Rorters & co pay above market value.......Its just not on the books. True market value should be set by the highest public bidder.....Not by the Rorters paying 800k for a test player & another 500k under the table.
 
supercoach said:
If your happy living in your current house and someone offers you 25% over the odds you probably say thanks but no thanks. On the other hand if your offered 50% or more you say..here are the keys. I think that’s where Moses is and I think Parra will get close enough to any other offer for him to say..thanks but no thanks
Click to expand...
Ok not the best analogy...

If someone offered me 125% of my houses value, I would be sorely tempted and it would be a No.
150% yes.

Someone offers me a job that pays 130% of my current pay. Well I am very tempted.

1 mil vs 1.3mil..

Plus you are coming home to the Tigers, your Uncle Elias played here. Yes we Smothered him before. But Moses may still have a connection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
sleeve said:
Yeah ! He's got over 4 mill in the bank , and he mumbles, jeese, you must be envious ,Ha !
Click to expand...
Highest paid player in the squad in one of the most prominent team positions for years.

Is it his fault or have the club continually failed him by not giving him proper media training?
 
sleeve said:
Jad, only a complete idiot would not take the most money he could get. That is the clubs problem,not his. His form for the dollars,is questionable, But AD on big dollars , and others do not get a mention, Brooks for all his critics, always gave for 80 minutes, he never dogged it like Mbye , Packer ,the listless Tamu,and a few others.
Click to expand...
I agree, what ever you may think of Brooks I think he always does his best.

There is only one game that I can think of where he may not have put in a whole hearted effort and that was the last game of the 2021 season vs the wooden spoon Dogs, but if he laid down in that game, he wasn't the only one.
 
Lauren said:
Taken from Zero Tackle
View attachment 4009
Click to expand...
Hilarious isn't it.
Kelma t, Hastings, James Tamou, Luke Garner and Jacob liddle being called out as best signings.

A team coming 16th shed's 5 players and they are the best recruits 😉
I am only rating Hastings to do well at Newcastle. Curiously interested if James Tamou winds back the clock at the cows, will be very telling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

... and 37 more.
Total: 1,495 (members: 87, guests: 1,408)
Back
Top