There's been a lot of discussion around culture and confusion to why there's been no immediate change in performance.
While I agree moving Sheens from his previous role has caused a major setback, I don't believe it's all been futile.
(Prior to reclaiming his coaching job) his evaluation of the team was proficient and I think he knew perfectly well that this club struggles to attract top-tier players.
He's always maintained that it will be a gradual process to rebuild it and I think the main problem (why we look disjointed) is that bringing in a certain standard of players (such as Koroisau, Papalii, Klemmer and Bateman) has now raised the bar, thus it requires further time and more experience together (learning each other's games) before we see some success.
No offence our guys have never played consistently at the level of those mentioned and they aren't going improve overnight. (It's a bit like when Harry Grant came here, the difference in competitiveness between him and our guys was clearly evident).
It's about bringing players up to a certain standard/level or recruiting the right players in order to do this - bringing the team up to scratch, so to speak.
His target was to have a competitive side, a genuine premiership contending team, by 2025.
If we can gain several players that are of a similar ability to all aforementioned players there's nothing to say we can't achieve this goal.