I suppose winning a premiership, test series and the title of best player in the world doesn’t count then?They all play to win mate...
Winning makes them 'Winners'
Winning every other week does not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I suppose winning a premiership, test series and the title of best player in the world doesn’t count then?They all play to win mate...
Winning makes them 'Winners'
Winning every other week does not.
It’s ironic that you’ve afforded Brooks every excuse under the sun but always slag Benji & Robbie for not winning enoughI love seeing a bloke who's 'winning' career average is just over 50%
continually being called a winner....
It's that our 'winner' didn't get more wins in his time on the field here?
Of course not,I suppose winning a premiership, test series and the title of best player in the world doesn’t count then?
It’s ironic that you’ve afforded Brooks every excuse under the sun but always slag Benji & Robbie for not winning enough
Poorly written, yes. But the question remains why did Sheens, Pascoe and Lee decide to resign him?Injuring his knee in Round 6 against the Parramatta Eels, Doueihi is set to miss the majority of the upcoming season and won't likely be able to return until the middle of the season.
This paragraph 😂
They didn't. They re-signed him because he is a good player.Poorly written, yes. But the question remains why did Sheens, Pascoe and Lee decide to resign him?
Has a lot of good attributes...Poorly written, yes. But the question remains why did Sheens, Pascoe and Lee decide to resign him?
Not sure, but I’m sure it’s contributed to all three being jobless.Poorly written, yes. But the question remains why did Sheens, Pascoe and Lee decide to resign him?
I dare say there’s blokes who played for Melbourne over that period who have much higher winning percentages yet failed to achieve his accomplishments.Of course not,
Fleeting moments in a 20 year career when he won about half of the games he played....
You're mixing AD up with Brooks. The anchor has finally been raised and the ship has also moved from a sandbank name Nofoaluma.Not sure, but I’m sure it’s contributed to all three being jobless.
I dare say there’s blokes who played for Melbourne over that period who have much higher winning percentages yet failed to achieve his accomplishments.
None... and that's the point.Are you now saying that Benji Marshall the Winner didn't have a high winning percentage?
How many of the blokes you're thinly referencing here - had the skillset of
Benji Marshall?.. I'll wait.
Lay off the jungle juice champ, if you can't see that he is a winner you obviously don't know what one is. Calculators and percentages are for nerds.I would suggest the irony lies with the that people calling a bloke who didn't win much more than he lost a winner...
Benji and Robbie were 2 of the best players of the past generation
- Benji a once in a lifetime player...
Yes -
I think Players of that Calibre should have a winning percentage likened to Smith or Slater...
Or at least making the top half of the comp even half of the time...
Winning championships and Golden Boots, Test Series makes you a winner, news flash, not winning every weekend game against dogshit opposition. Winners win big games not ones that no one remembers, Jesus wept.They all play to win mate...
Winning makes them 'Winners'
Winning every other week does not.
So true, some bums have winning percentages over 70% but never won a title, Golden Boot or Test series but they are "winners", what a load of shit.I dare say there’s blokes who played for Melbourne over that period who have much higher winning percentages yet failed to achieve his accomplishments.
What are without him, 25%!? I.e he’s important to winning.I love seeing a bloke who's 'winning' career average is just over 50%
continually being called a winner....
It's that our 'winner' didn't get more wins in his time on the field here?
Not all great players are in a great environment, a point you always seem to miss.I would suggest the irony lies with the that people calling a bloke who didn't win much more than he lost a winner...
Benji and Robbie were 2 of the best players of the past generation
- Benji a once in a lifetime player...
Yes -
I think Players of that Calibre should have a winning percentage likened to Smith or Slater...
Or at least making the top half of the comp even half of the time...