Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion
- Thread starter MacDougall
- Start date
Bus 2 Terrigal
Well-known member
I assume he’s referring to the Skillion (not the beach) 🤣
Attachments
Snidest 0
Well-known member
Anyone care to explain to the shut-in that when facing East (i.e. the Pacific Ocean from the NSW Coast) that South is on your right?
upthetigers
Well-known member
In what way what's good about Canberra? 🤣
GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
That’s it.
BlackWhiteGold
Well-known member
Sounds like Hughes may be one who may cash in with one of the expansion teams! If halves are playing to mid-30s, he'd be perfect for the Perth Bears or PNG Pacific Protectors!
Jonah Pezet knocks back Knights to stay at Melbourne Storm
The Newcastle Knights made a monster $2.5 million bid to lure Jonah Pezet away from the Storm but the former Wyong Roo has opted to stick with Melbourne - though he has inserted a surprise clause into his new deal.
Jonah Pezet has inked a long-term deal to remain at the Storm but it comes with a strict clause which could allow him to exit the club should Jahrome Hughes extend his time at Melbourne.
Pezet was chased heavily by Newcastle who put forward a monster $2.5 million four year bid but he has opted to stay at the Storm after agreeing to a four-year contract extension. His deal will expire at the end of 2029 however Pezet may be free to leave earlier.
Hughes is contracted to Melbourne until the end of 2026. Should he agree to a deal beyond that period then Pezet is an immediate free agent. Hughes will be 32 in 2026 while Pezet will be just 23.
The contract safeguards both Pezet and the Storm. It means Pezet will not be stuck behind Hughes and Cameron Munster for an extended period while the Storm have a ready-made replacement should Hughes leave the club.
Jonah Pezet knocks back Knights to stay at Melbourne Storm
The Newcastle Knights made a monster $2.5 million bid to lure Jonah Pezet away from the Storm but the former Wyong Roo has opted to stick with Melbourne - though he has inserted a surprise clause into his new deal.
Jonah Pezet has inked a long-term deal to remain at the Storm but it comes with a strict clause which could allow him to exit the club should Jahrome Hughes extend his time at Melbourne.
Pezet was chased heavily by Newcastle who put forward a monster $2.5 million four year bid but he has opted to stay at the Storm after agreeing to a four-year contract extension. His deal will expire at the end of 2029 however Pezet may be free to leave earlier.
Hughes is contracted to Melbourne until the end of 2026. Should he agree to a deal beyond that period then Pezet is an immediate free agent. Hughes will be 32 in 2026 while Pezet will be just 23.
The contract safeguards both Pezet and the Storm. It means Pezet will not be stuck behind Hughes and Cameron Munster for an extended period while the Storm have a ready-made replacement should Hughes leave the club.
user118245
Well-known member
Who’s this?
GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
May
diedpretty
Well-known member
My goodness - Melbourne allowed a clause in one of their contracts!!!
jrtiger
Well-known member
“How can anyone with a straight face claim Frank Ponnissi is any better than Pascoe now?!”
I can see a world where we sign Smith. If we get off to a good start, and his mates are complimentary about Benji and the culture , and with the 4 or 5 surplus to need players in our squad , I can in-vision a mid season swap .
I can’t see it any earlier due to the club needing to figure out Galvins upgrade , and whether Klemmer is likely to get his extension. July 31 , is a good chunk into the season .
I can’t see it any earlier due to the club needing to figure out Galvins upgrade , and whether Klemmer is likely to get his extension. July 31 , is a good chunk into the season .
supercoach
Well-known member
Mate was never there when I was a kid, the path that is. We would run up the grass and roll down the hill!!
Tucker
Well-known member
Very different clause to the one we allowed.
A junior player can leave if the current Dally M player extends…..the contract protects the club.
GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
Least you’re quoting me correctly now. I never said Richo was worse than Pascoe.
Dennisspicer1
Well-known member
But they will get no criticism.
GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
Considering it’s not a clause based on the clubs performance, I’m not sure why there would be
Tigerwould
Well-known member
AdelaideTiger
Well-known member
They did decriminalize nose candy recently...
Snidest 0
Well-known member
I'm not the one who apparently needed a compass to work out that he was at the South end of Terrigal...
