@Swordy said:@innsaneink said:@Swordy said:**Thats right. Always someone else fault. This time it was the guy who filmed it.**
So lets get back to the original issue. It wasnt the privacy of his own home or a friends barbecue. It was someone else home whom he had apparently been invited into , initially. This means he was a guest and should at least behave with some dignity and respect.
He forced himself physically onto a female who was not interested in his advances.
He urinated on the lounge, someone elses property and then had to be repeatedly asked to leave. And dry humped the dog for good measure.
Youre right, it was the camera mans fault, not the guy who is paid good money by a club, sponsors and fans to behave like a human on and off the field….
Oh, and a guy who has been chosen by that club to be a leader and set an example for younger players, AND ACCEPTED THAT POSITION AND ALL THAT COMES WITH IT.
Who is saying this?
You haven't seen the posts or news feeds about how this camerman 'sold' his video and that was wrong and immoral, or how this is wrong to share the video because it was in private etc etc? Some definitely trying to set up a case for shared blame. Me thinks not.
I don't know why you put sold in quotation marks.
The video was sold.
Yes I've seen these comments…. I think it's a separate issue.
I guess you have no problem being filmed without your knowledge.
Just because someone might have an issue with filming and privacy... That doesn't mean they condone the actions of Mitch pearce