mike
Well-known member
@Hangonaminute said in [Bitcoin](/post/1146611) said:@mike said in [Bitcoin](/post/1145727) said:@willow said in [Bitcoin](/post/1145720) said:Bitcoin isn't the one to gamble your savings on. They'll only produce a finite number and then that's it. You needed to get onto it 5 years ago.
Pretty much a electronic pyramid scheme long term.
I'm interested in why you think that.
You only make money based on people who enter after you. This is a typical Pyramid Scheme fingerprint.
Apart from the above (Pyramid Scheme) Bitcoin is based on Blockchain, the first if memory serves. The biggest weakness of Blockchain is scalability. It just doesn’t scale well. The amount of compute and network resources needed to update gets to a point of diminishing returns. That is the cost to update the Blockchain exceeds its value. We are fast approaching that tipping point. Unless there is some underlying discovery that can dramatically increase the compute power of the planet Bitcoin will eventually run out of steam.
We are already down to just a few atoms on a silicon wafer per transistor, so there isn’t much more room to increase the compute power per watt of power needed using existing von Neumann architecture computers. In the end Blockchain updates will simply cost more than it is worth or worse never get a chance to complete. The only savour on the horizon for Blockchain and therefore Bitcoin that I can see is Quantum Computing but that is still a few years off, possibly decades, before it will be commercially viable as we are still in the discovery and research phase. Will we reach the Bitcoin cost tipping point before then? I don’t think anyone is game to predict.