HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

If you agree with the contents of this email, and are tired of the ongoing turmoil and want the CEO focused on priorities like recruitment, development pathways, member engagement, and stabilising the football department, you can copy and send the message below to the NRL:

Emails:
Reception@nrl.com.au
aabdo@nrl.com.au
feedback@nrl.com.au
licensing@nrl.com.au



Subject: Concern About Governance of the Wests Tigers

To whom it may concern,

I’m writing to express my personal concern about the governance of the Wests Tigers. In my view, the influence of the debenture holders and HBG has been damaging to the club’s stability, progress, and long-term direction, harming members, supporters, and the reputation of the game.

I ask that the NRL review the situation and intervene with HBG before further harm is done to the club or the league.

Regards,

(Your name)
 
They haven't just removed the board though, have they. There's been 8 directors kicked off, in 3 rounds across two boards. Protection of an apparent harassment case because they needed his vote, lawsuits between directors, and persistence wifh significant structural issues effecting proper member representation. That's just what is public.
Here’s a Chammas article from Dec 13 last year. This article was the warning for what has just happened.

Their ambition is to see the Magpies replace the Wests Tigers’: Director’s stunning claim​

Michael Chammas
Dec 13, 2024

A director of the Holman Barnes Group, the majority owner of the Wests Tigers, has warned of a growing movement at board level to “see the Western Suburbs Magpies replace the Wests Tigers in the NRL”.

A text message sent by former HBG chairman turned director Tony Andreacchio to several club members and seen by the Herald outlines concerns over the direction of the organisation in charge of the Wests Tigers, which is currently chaired by Julie Romero.

Balmain, Western Suburbs and Wests Tigers fans at Leichhardt Oval.

Balmain, Western Suburbs and Wests Tigers fans at Leichhardt Oval.Credit: Getty Images

Andreacchio, who is one of three board members currently suspended and expected to be removed as early as this weekend after facing a disciplinary hearing over alleged misconduct, has moved to try and expose the internal power play that could rock the foundations of the Wests Tigers.

“If the plan devised by these … individuals unfolds as expected later this week, our removal as directors will be finalised and our club membership will be banned indefinitely,” the text message sent by Andreacchio said.
“Consequently, the HBG will fall under the control of a cabal of four, supported by an outdated debenture holder system (currently comprising only 18 individuals). Their misguided ambition is to see the Western Suburbs Magpies replace the Wests Tigers in the NRL competition.”

When contacted for comment on Friday afternoon, Andreacchio – who previously served as chairman of the HBG for two-and-a-half years until he was overthrown by Romero in March this year – refused to discuss the text message but admitted he had grave fears for the future of the Wests Tigers.

The Wests Tigers are coming off three wooden spoons.

The Wests Tigers are coming off three wooden spoons.Credit: NRL Photos

“I’m not going to comment on a very private text message,” Andreacchio, a HBG director of 12 years, told this masthead.

“All I will say is that my only concern is the best interests of the Wests Tigers. Some on the board couldn’t cope with losing their blazers as part of the review. If I was a passionate Wests Tigers fan, of which I am, I would be very worried about the future of the merger.”
Romero did not respond to attempts to contact her on Friday.

Sources with knowledge of the situation talking on the condition of anonymity told this masthead that a high-ranking Wests Tigers official recently approached Australian Rugby League Commission chairman Peter V’landys with the same concerns.

Holman Barnes Group directors Tony Andreacchio and Dennis Burgess.

Holman Barnes Group directors Tony Andreacchio and Dennis Burgess.Credit: SMH

The official contacted V’landys after learning that HBG director Dennis Burgess, who now holds a position on the Wests Tigers board, had been talking of an intention to bring back the Magpies in the NRL.

The allegations raised with V’landys included a claim that Burgess had told Balmain chairman Danny Stapleton at a game this year, “We’re bringing back the Wests Magpies”.
Burgess declined to comment when contacted on Friday night. “I have nothing to say,” he said.

The Wests Tigers official wanted to warn the NRL of the plan they believed was being devised by the new leadership of the HBG.

The Herald has also obtained a separate document, compiled by two club members and sent to Liquor and Gaming NSW. The document is a request for Liquor and Gaming NSW to appoint an administrator to the HBG, as happened at the Parramatta Eels almost a decade ago.

In the letter, it is claimed “There has been a total breakdown in the management of HBG in that the board is completely dysfunctional and the relationships so toxic, it is impossible for the board to operate effectively, or at all”.

The HBG, formerly known as the Wests Ashfield Leagues Club Group, is currently split into two factions. The faction on the outer consists of Andreacchio and directors Rick Wayde and David Gilbert, all of whom were once on the board of the Wests Tigers.
Loading

They are under investigation for what Wayde last month described as “trivial” allegations made against him and two other board members, among them not sitting with other directors at functions, calling an official’s wife “darl” and telling another she was in the wrong corporate box at a game.

Other allegations against a particular director includes referring to fellow board members as a “f—ing softie”, a “f—ing suck” and “parrots” in a raised voice.

It was further alleged that Andreacchio was in breach of his constitutional duty after he opposed attempts by a fellow director to change the Western Suburbs Magpies jersey to black and white in the lower grades, because he believed all teams should play under the Wests Tigers banner, including NSW Cup.

The trio of suspended directors were the driving force behind the implementation of the independent culture and governance review that led to the exit of former Wests Tigers chief executive Justin Pascoe and chairman Lee Hagipantelis.
Since then, Andreacchio has been overthrown as chair, with Romero and Burgess replacing the duo at the helm of the powerful club in March with the backing of fellow directors Stephen Montgomery (recently added to Wests Tigers board) and Vincent Tropiano.

The HBG has over 27,000 members. The board consists of seven members, two of whom are elected by general members and five of whom are elected by the remaining 18 living debenture holders. The constitution makes it difficult to effect significant change at a board level.

Andreacchio’s text message also claims that the Romero-aligned directors in power at HBG are opposed to the appointment of Shane Richardson as Wests Tigers chief executive and Barry O’Farrell as chairman.

Wests Tigers chairman Barry O’Farrell, coach Benji Marshall and CEO Shane Richardson.

Wests Tigers chairman Barry O’Farrell, coach Benji Marshall and CEO Shane Richardson.Credit: Getty

“Whether I remain or return as a director is not the key issue,” the director said in his message to select members.
“What matters most is the continued success and prosperity of the HBG and the long-overdue revival of the Wests Tigers.”

Loading

The rise of Romero has also drawn the ire of Balmain. In August, this masthead reported that Balmain director Garry Leo was calling for Balmain to break away from the Wests Tigers and begin a campaign to reinstate the foundation club back in the NRL. Leo has since resigned from his role on the Balmain board.

At the heart of his frustration was growing angst over the behaviour and actions of the HBG, shared by some of his directors.

In a series of private emails obtained by the Herald, Balmain directors described the Wests Tigers majority owner as “incompetent”, “Machiavellian” and a “bunch of tin pots”.
The HBG board recently asked O’Farrell to reapply for his job after the expiry of his interim contract as chairman of the Wests Tigers following the removal of Hagipantelis on the back of a culture and governance review.

Balmain chairman Danny Stapleton, who is also a representative on the Wests Tigers board, sent an email to Balmain directors in August stating: “the split on the [HBG} board is real and decisive” and that Balmain had “challenges on our hands with the unrest at HBG board level”.

Stapleton also stated: “My understanding, and I have not been told formally, is that the controlling faction at HBG Board now wants to unwind the outcomes and recommendations of the review process and take back the control and running of Wests Tigers.”
 
Harry got pissed off when Pascoe stopped giving him free handouts.
Pretty sure it was when the morons at Balmain Leagues decided to listen to Benny's consortium to build the new premises, that ended up being their downfall. Harry said after all the time he spent there, the money he put into it, he said we could have helped with the council issues we could have helped with the planning issues, he said he never even got a call. That's when he washed his hands.
 
They haven't just removed the board though, have they. There's been 8 directors kicked off, in 3 rounds across two boards. Protection of an apparent harassment case because they needed his vote, lawsuits between directors, and persistence wifh significant structural issues effecting proper member representation. That's just what is public.
LIcensing and Gaming have already investigated HBG when Wade and Co got punted and found no cause to pursue the matter. Presently the only thing LG have said is that they are monitoring the situation. In other words they don't give a toss at this stage.
 
Could only hope so.... Not like the tigers wouldn't have interested investors that could chip in with laundry...
I can't see HBG selling or being forced to sell, I wish it would happen. But only to a consortium with considerable money and we remain the Wests Tigers. There is no more Magpies and Balmain. Today's kids only know Wests Tigers.
 
Here it is one & all, suspended HBG board member Tony Andreaccio told us 12 months ago.

“The HBG will fall under the control of a cabal of four. … Their misguided ambition is to see the Western Suburbs Magpies replace the Wests Tigers in the NRL competition.”

It’s all PR spin from Paton this week, the plan is to ultimately replace the Tigers with Magpies.

The cabal referred to is Burgess, Montgomery, Tropiana with Lubinski now forming a majority on the HBG board with Paton as their gimp.

@FacePalm is there one who wields the power in this cabal in your view? The puppetmaster as you have suggested.
 
Here it is one & all, suspended HBG board member Tony Andreaccio told us 12 months ago.

“The HBG will fall under the control of a cabal of four. … Their misguided ambition is to see the Western Suburbs Magpies replace the Wests Tigers in the NRL competition.”

It’s all PR spin from Paton this week, the plan is to ultimately replace the Tigers with Magpies.

The cabal referred to is Burgess, Montgomery, Tropiana with Lubinski now forming a majority on the HBG board with Paton as their gimp.

@FacePalm is there one who wields the power in this cabal in your view? The puppetmaster as you have suggested.
YEP - but the mods here let the pro-Magpies trolls run rampant because they were blind to reality!
 
Here it is one & all, suspended HBG board member Tony Andreaccio told us 12 months ago.

“The HBG will fall under the control of a cabal of four. … Their misguided ambition is to see the Western Suburbs Magpies replace the Wests Tigers in the NRL competition.”

It’s all PR spin from Paton this week, the plan is to ultimately replace the Tigers with Magpies.

The cabal referred to is Burgess, Montgomery, Tropiana with Lubinski now forming a majority on the HBG board with Paton as their gimp.

@FacePalm is there one who wields the power in this cabal in your view? The puppetmaster as you have suggested.
Correct
 
I can't see HBG selling or being forced to sell, I wish it would happen. But only to a consortium with considerable money and we remain the Wests Tigers. There is no more Magpies and Balmain. Today's kids only know Wests Tigers.
Do you know PVL’s recent history in Racing NSW and prior to that Harness Racing NSW before becoming involved with the NRL ?
The man is a magician and I don’t say that lightly about anyone.
He will force HBG to either eat humble pie and make massive changes which would quite possibly involve reinstating the dismissed board members, or if they don’t comply he will back them into a corner and make things so untenable that selling would be there only viable option.
There is no doubt he will intervene and get things back in order and I expect it will all happen very fast.
Richo would have already walked unless he was waiting on some big changes to happen and I’m guessing he’s already had in depth conversations with PVL about it.
 
It smells like HBG are very happy to play the long game right through to 2030 when the heritage deed expires for the Wests Tigers. At this time the club can attempt to change to Magpies with NRL approval. This year must be all about regaining control of the club which they lost due to Rick Wayde, Tony Andrecchio & Dave Gilbert supporting the review & then Julie Romero the implementation. Now all 4 are gone.
 
It smells like HBG are very happy to play the long game right through to 2030 when the heritage deed expires for the Wests Tigers. At this time the club can attempt to change to Magpies with NRL approval. This year must be all about regaining control of the club which they lost due to Rick Wayde, Tony Andrecchio & Dave Gilbert supporting the review & then Julie Romero the implementation. Now all 4 are gone.
Its our club mate, we can fight for it.
 
I agree.
I have not been arguing about that and I am also not arguing that it appears DB is a bad apple and needs to be removed.
As for HBG itself, I assume PVL will take action if there latest actions have been done without any justification and rightly so.
The other HBG board member who currently sits on the Wests Tigers board is ex Magpies player Leo Epifania. At this stage he has not been accused of any wrongdoing except being guilty by association to HBG. Nobody knows if he has done anything wrong yet he is also being made out to be a criminal due to his association with HBG.
Then on a prominent Facebook page another old Magpies warrior Allan Fallah is also being attacked by people who appear to have no idea he’s an ex player who spilled blood and guts for the Magpies jersey.
For these ex players who have not been found to have done anything wrong, yet are being victimised as guilty by association to the Wests Magpies and the HBG is an absolute disgrace and a total lack of respect towards people who paved the way for Wests Tigers to even exist.
Great post Vicious...Without doubt you are the most sensible poster on here.
You're not allowing yourself to get carried away with all the unsubstantiated rumours and b/s that's floating around here.
You've covered issues from both sides and done it responsibly and fairly without fear of retaliation.

I imagine you must have had experience in debating.
My wish is that a lot more on here follow your example.
 
Great post Vicious...Without doubt you are the most sensible poster on here.
You're not allowing yourself to get carried away with all the unsubstantiated rumours and b/s that's floating around here.
You've covered issues from both sides and done it responsibly and fairly without fear of retaliation.

I imagine you must have had experience in debating.
My wish is that a lot more on here follow your example.
You do realise that what you described is the opposite of debating?

In a debate you take one side of an issue to convince the audience that your side is right and the opposition is wrong.
 
Its our club mate, we can fight for it.
It’s interesting, from what you said, the NRL tip in ten times as much as HBG to WT. that money ultimately comes from all of us. So the NRL (and by extension we) fund WT.

What requirements do HBG need to fulfill to keep getting this massive grant that we all pay for, do you know?
 
Great post Vicious...Without doubt you are the most sensible poster on here.
You're not allowing yourself to get carried away with all the unsubstantiated rumours and b/s that's floating around here.
You've covered issues from both sides and done it responsibly and fairly without fear of retaliation.

I imagine you must have had experience in debating.
My wish is that a lot more on here follow your example.

You're even more transparent than the very finest sherry glass old chap!

Splendid!

Let's all pat ourselves on the back for supporting a demonstrably dysfunctional leagues club board ahead of the interests of our football team!
 
It’s interesting how you said the NRL tip in ten times as much as HBG to WT. that money ultimately comes from all of us. So the NRL (and by extension we) fund WT.

What requirements do HBG need to fulfill to keep getting this massive grant that we all pay for, do you know?
They have to meet the obligations in their licence agreement.
 
It’s interesting, from what you said, the NRL tip in ten times as much as HBG to WT. that money ultimately comes from all of us. So the NRL (and by extension we) fund WT.

What requirements do HBG need to fulfill to keep getting this massive grant that we all pay for, do you know?
The Wests Tigers generate more of their own revenue than the HBG provides. I also think the NRL Grant is poorly named for what it actually is. The majority of the 'NRL Grant' comes from broadcasting agreements.

All clubs are providing the NRL with product (games)to sell to the broadcasters. Ultimately the Grant is payment for that product and shouldn’t be considered a grant in the traditional sense.
 
The Wests Tigers generate more of their own revenue than the HBG provides. I also think the NRL Grant is poorly named for what it actually is. The majority of the 'NRL Grant' comes from broadcasting agreements.

All clubs are providing the NRL with product (games)to sell to the broadcasters. Ultimately the Grant is payment for that product and shouldn’t be considered a grant in the traditional sense.
So the grant money is from tv subscribers and advertising revenue, or in other words, our eyeballs.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top