James Tedesco Signs with Roosters [Official]

I was only wondering the other day what the go with Moses is. The news of him to Parra broke the same day the news about Brooks re-signing broke. So the COP should have ended. What's the hold up?
 
Perhaps they are waiting to see if they can get him for this season before making any announcements
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Our mate Jimmy Hooper shot down the suggestion, reckons he'll put pen to paper for 4 years this week.

Same one that said a deal was done a week or so ago? He's a peanut. Teddy has agreed to terms but those terms have been rejected by NRL on TPA basis. Doesn't mean he's coming back or what ever just means the roosters have to find the money promised in the contract elsewhere or teddy can accept a lesser offer or he can reject it all together.

You are the only peanut here, making out you know all yet you know nothing. Terms have not been rejected by NRL..have another go. Isaac Moses go to man Hooper has said he will sign with roosters this week and that's what will happen.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Jog along pal. Take your hatred elsewhere peasant
 
Moses requested a longer a COP, with an option to announce it earlier (I assume that would be if he was granted an immediate release). It doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but what does in Rugby League these Days?
 
@ said:
Moses requested a longer a COP, with an option to announce it earlier (I assume that would be if he was granted an immediate release). It doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but what does in Rugby League these Days?
Click to expand...

That's not even a thing.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Moses requested a longer a COP, with an option to announce it earlier (I assume that would be if he was granted an immediate release). It doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but what does in Rugby League these Days?

That's not even a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

The longer COP?
 
Why do you need a longer COP? You just don't sign the contract until you are sure. If Parramatta agreed to this, they should see the writing on the wall in terms of a player trying to dictate terms to them before he has even arrived.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Moses requested a longer a COP, with an option to announce it earlier (I assume that would be if he was granted an immediate release). It doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but what does in Rugby League these Days?

That's not even a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

That's what i thought… Just what i heard. Again, doesn't mean that it's 100% accurate.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Moses requested a longer a COP, with an option to announce it earlier (I assume that would be if he was granted an immediate release). It doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but what does in Rugby League these Days?

That's not even a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Whats "not even a thing"?
 
I can't see why you can't have a longer COP. Presumably, a COP of 10 days is a minimum term in all playing contracts but we know it can be waived by the player - see Nofo. Similarly, the contract could be drafted with a longer COP. Im not saying it happened but I can't see any reason why it couldn't.

I do recall another player recently getting for a longer COP. I can't recall who it was, so it seems there is some precedent.
 
@ said:
Why do you need a longer COP? You just don't sign the contract until you are sure. If Parramatta agreed to this, they should see the writing on the wall in terms of a player trying to dictate terms to them before he has even arrived.
Click to expand...

Could have been a ploy to then force tigers to counter during COB.
 
There are many reasons Moses would sign a longer COP in this case. He essentially signed the Parra deal the same day the tigers withdrew his offer, so he and the people around him were aware that it was somewhat of a emotional decision that he may later regret. With the Tigers withdrawing their offer and saying "we will revise it later" it drove his price down. The cap was announced to be lower on the Friday before and Cronk also announced his decision two days before with Brooks re-signing quick before his price went down. Moses may have been aware he wasn't going to get the money Parra were offering elsewhere so he signed it as an insurance policy before more offers were pulled and revised. Another reason may be that he was waiting to see what happened with Tedesco and Woods. There's quite a few reasons he may have requested it. He may not even have a longer COP, or even have signed when it was reported.
 
Smart business giving yourself longer to back out if the club can't move other players on or organise legal TPAs.
Tigers wisely pulled the get out of jail card. Treating the club like a door mat.
 
@ said:
I can't see why you can't have a longer COP. Presumably, a COP of 10 days is a minimum term in all playing contracts but we know it can be waived by the player - see Nofo. Similarly, the contract could be drafted with a longer COP. Im not saying it happened but I can't see any reason why it couldn't.

I do recall another player recently getting for a longer COP. I can't recall who it was, so it seems there is some precedent.
Click to expand...

A cooling off period isn’t part of the contract, it is a condition set by the NRL, player signs contract, club lodges contract with the NRL, the NRL waits 10 business days, nothing happens NRL registers contract.
 
@ said:
@ said:
I can't see why you can't have a longer COP. Presumably, a COP of 10 days is a minimum term in all playing contracts but we know it can be waived by the player - see Nofo. Similarly, the contract could be drafted with a longer COP. Im not saying it happened but I can't see any reason why it couldn't.

I do recall another player recently getting for a longer COP. I can't recall who it was, so it seems there is some precedent.

A cooling off period isn’t part of the contract, it is a condition set by the NRL, player signs contract, club lodges contract with the NRL, the NRL waits 10 business days, nothing happens NRL registers contract.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

In that case, maybe the contract hasn't been lodged with the NRL by request… It could be as simple as that. Considering he supposedly signed the contract the Tuesday of the Cowboys game, it's been over 3 weeks now. Something has to have happened to that effect?
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I can't see why you can't have a longer COP. Presumably, a COP of 10 days is a minimum term in all playing contracts but we know it can be waived by the player - see Nofo. Similarly, the contract could be drafted with a longer COP. Im not saying it happened but I can't see any reason why it couldn't.

I do recall another player recently getting for a longer COP. I can't recall who it was, so it seems there is some precedent.

A cooling off period isn’t part of the contract, it is a condition set by the NRL, player signs contract, club lodges contract with the NRL, the NRL waits 10 business days, nothing happens NRL registers contract.

In that case, maybe the contract hasn't been lodged with the NRL by request… It could be as simple as that. Considering he supposedly signed the contract the Tuesday of the Cowboys game, it's been over 3 weeks now. Something has to have happened to that effect?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Once lodged with the NRL they would need to check that it is under the cap, not only next year but future years if clubs still have any back ended contracts, check any TPA’s etc, many things could slow it down
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 390 (members: 3, guests: 387)
Back
Top