swag_tiger
Well-known member
The tention is a killer in relation to this possible signing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@happy_tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1082413) said:Sometimes those boofhead mates stumble onto something
Or sometimes a Dad of a player thanks you for showing so much support to their son
Sometimes boofheads get lucky
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1082317) said:Also if I remember correctly, someone on this forum knows someone involved in marketing at Easts. Might be the same person. They knew the day that Tedesco was going to be announced before the announcements were made. Even got the time right if I remember correctly.
@tbones10 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1082486) said:I'll be honest lads, I'm about done with the entire Latrell saga. I've been lead to believe that an offer has been tabled, for not only the position but at the dollars he is asking, he has even spoken to other clubs even after the tigers made him an offer, there is no one else and he still hasn't signed. I might be a bit thin skinned, but that feels a bit disrespectful to me, he should either knock it back or put pen to paper, or the tigers
rescind the offer, just so all parties can move forward.
@Spud_Murphy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1082402) said:@tigertye said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1082381) said:I’ll have a guess. 4pm today...major press conference....Pascoe will wear his best tie.
I sure as hell hope so, as I don’t think I could handle another weekend of everyone speculating, myself included!
@Newtown said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1082491) said:Don't roosters have to release him first before he signs with another club?
@weststigers said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1082510) said:Ultimately, it's in the Roosters best interest to release ASAP as they will want to get on with signing players.
Can't see that being the hold up.
The smokey is Souths...if the NRL grants Burgess a medical retirement, then it stands to reason that they'll make a play for Mitchell.
It's very likely Mitchell is under advice to wait the situation out to put 2 bidders back in the auction. Perhaps the "fine print" theory is just a ruse to drag out negotiations until Souths can get their hat in the ring?
Our best chance is if the NRL do not grant the medical retirement...
As of now, we are the only one in the running and it hasn't been announced...Mitchell is hoping for more options to present themselves...
@Furious1 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1082506) said:Why ultimatum? Just start hunting the next target, if the next target signs you remove the previous offer. We just need to keep moving forward.