@Moh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1078979) said:
Why are no other club interested though...
I know it's pessimistic, but I just can't see him coming here.
Originally, I was in the side of those who say too much money for someone so frustratingly inconsistent, but the more talk about him coming, the more excited I get about it.
Even if he doesn't deliver every game, it's such a massive signing that other positive things will start rolling in around it.
I feel exactly the same, I was in the NO camp initially especially after seeing his woeful performance for Australia that just tipped me right off him.
But.... This club needs a big name signing, it needs a player to excited about, and one in their prime and with plenty of upside.
We definitely need a fullback and a strike weapon and he fits both.
The $$$ are the ? but I think if he produces his best he's a bargain.
He'll definitely lift the confidence and belief in the team to a new level and we need to if we want to play semi finals footy.
So I can definitely see the positives outweighing the negatives.
At this stage though if we don't get him I can see that being a big kick in the guts and having a negative effect going into next season.
The biggest issue for me is a true million dollar player best and worst shouldn't be that far apart
Look at your Smith's ,Thurston's , Johns , Tedesco's ,Taumalolo's
That's why I question paying 1 million for Mitchell ...bit like spending a million on Hunt you just won't get enough million dollar performances in a season ....and particularly when you need it against sides like the Storm ,Roosters etc
Speculation Happy.
I would consider Mitchell to be worth more than million dollar blokes like Hunt, Foran , Ash Taylor, Milford, Pearce, Shaun Johnson, Jack Bird and plenty of others close to a million a year.
Plus he can still get better... it's worth the risk.