@hobbo1 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085088) said:Thank Christ that’s over ..
Mitchell’s a flog ..ain’t worth 1 million
Totally agree
Glad that circus is over with and we can all move on
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@hobbo1 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085088) said:Thank Christ that’s over ..
Mitchell’s a flog ..ain’t worth 1 million
@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085089) said:@tigerbalm said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085087) said:@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085082) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085078) said:@TheDaBoss said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085049) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085044) said:We released Matterson and Marsters early and now our best hope is to POSSIBLY sign Luciano Leilua and Zane Musgrove. I think this leaves us with a weaker squad than 2019. Paying $2000 for Season Tickets to NOT make the Semis again is a decision that will haunt me
Luciano is 100% with us, all pieces are falling in place and the Pom confirmed it
But we were told "We won't be releasing Matterson early unless it benefits Wests Tigers" we've negatively impacted our squad by releasing him BEFORE we had a better player secured.
It benefited us by not having to pay him a cent from his 2020 contract when we did...meanwhile the Rorters are paying Mitchell 14K a week to go fishing
That makes zero sense, Maybe I'm missing something.
Wests had a player who was worth ~ double what they were playing him but had a contract. That's sports. They did not have to release him but if they did, they would want market value for him, not what his contract was for.
So no, they didn't save 350 from 2020, they lost a 600+k player they were paying 350k for. That 350k will mean sweet FA in the cap situation and that move has greatly weakened the team.
I'm still at a loss to know what Wests got from the "deal". Apart from shafted. again. By poor management. Again.
A player that didn't want to be here..that always works well..it allowed us to go in the market for Luciano Leulia
@tigerbalm said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085087) said:@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085082) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085078) said:@TheDaBoss said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085049) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085044) said:We released Matterson and Marsters early and now our best hope is to POSSIBLY sign Luciano Leilua and Zane Musgrove. I think this leaves us with a weaker squad than 2019. Paying $2000 for Season Tickets to NOT make the Semis again is a decision that will haunt me
Luciano is 100% with us, all pieces are falling in place and the Pom confirmed it
But we were told "We won't be releasing Matterson early unless it benefits Wests Tigers" we've negatively impacted our squad by releasing him BEFORE we had a better player secured.
It benefited us by not having to pay him a cent from his 2020 contract when we did...meanwhile the Rorters are paying Mitchell 14K a week to go fishing
That makes zero sense, Maybe I'm missing something.
Wests had a player who was worth ~ double what they were playing him but had a contract. That's sports. They did not have to release him but if they did, they would want market value for him, not what his contract was for.
So no, they didn't save 350 from 2020, they lost a 600+k player they were paying 350k for. That 350k will mean sweet FA in the cap situation and that move has greatly weakened the team.
I'm still at a loss to know what Wests got from the "deal". Apart from shafted. again. By poor management. Again.
@THE_POM said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1084995) said:@Needaname said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1084992) said:@POM, if you are still on. Confirmation of Stepheno from Parra? And is a deal likely to be arranged for 2020?
Parra really peeved we've even got him for 2021 & looking to do us no favours but Tigers doing their best to get him for 2020.
@ElleryHanley said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085098) said:@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085089) said:@tigerbalm said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085087) said:@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085082) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085078) said:@TheDaBoss said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085049) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085044) said:We released Matterson and Marsters early and now our best hope is to POSSIBLY sign Luciano Leilua and Zane Musgrove. I think this leaves us with a weaker squad than 2019. Paying $2000 for Season Tickets to NOT make the Semis again is a decision that will haunt me
Luciano is 100% with us, all pieces are falling in place and the Pom confirmed it
But we were told "We won't be releasing Matterson early unless it benefits Wests Tigers" we've negatively impacted our squad by releasing him BEFORE we had a better player secured.
It benefited us by not having to pay him a cent from his 2020 contract when we did...meanwhile the Rorters are paying Mitchell 14K a week to go fishing
That makes zero sense, Maybe I'm missing something.
Wests had a player who was worth ~ double what they were playing him but had a contract. That's sports. They did not have to release him but if they did, they would want market value for him, not what his contract was for.
So no, they didn't save 350 from 2020, they lost a 600+k player they were paying 350k for. That 350k will mean sweet FA in the cap situation and that move has greatly weakened the team.
I'm still at a loss to know what Wests got from the "deal". Apart from shafted. again. By poor management. Again.
A player that didn't want to be here..that always works well..it allowed us to go in the market for Luciano Leulia
Very tough one as matterson sulked...
But basically we have replaced a fringe origin forward and our best player, with a hugely overweight St George bench player.
I know Matterson made it difficult / impossible, but you just get the feeling Bellamy / Bennet / Rorters would have got a better result.
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085024) said:@Moh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085016) said:@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085011) said:@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085004) said:@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1084996) said:Has he signed yet???
Hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
You gullible fools!!!
I told all you fools from the start, players like Latrell Mitchell don't come to the Weststigers.
I really can't believe you actually thought it would happen.
Drone malfunction...
Someone is looking foolish..agreed..
Did you take my drone story seriously?
I genuinely think some people did, one of the highlights of this thread. And really, a summation of it.
Well if they did, it's confirmation that people will believe anything if it suits their bias.
Obviously I was just having a laugh at the whole situation.
My constant "has he signed yet" posts were also taking the piss out of everyone hanging on every piece of "news" to come out, I really enjoyed the whole ride.
Reading the stuff posted on here just shows how desperate we are to sign a quality player.
@4jtigers said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085100) said:@tigerbalm said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085087) said:@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085082) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085078) said:@TheDaBoss said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085049) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085044) said:We released Matterson and Marsters early and now our best hope is to POSSIBLY sign Luciano Leilua and Zane Musgrove. I think this leaves us with a weaker squad than 2019. Paying $2000 for Season Tickets to NOT make the Semis again is a decision that will haunt me
Luciano is 100% with us, all pieces are falling in place and the Pom confirmed it
But we were told "We won't be releasing Matterson early unless it benefits Wests Tigers" we've negatively impacted our squad by releasing him BEFORE we had a better player secured.
It benefited us by not having to pay him a cent from his 2020 contract when we did...meanwhile the Rorters are paying Mitchell 14K a week to go fishing
That makes zero sense, Maybe I'm missing something.
Wests had a player who was worth ~ double what they were playing him but had a contract. That's sports. They did not have to release him but if they did, they would want market value for him, not what his contract was for.
So no, they didn't save 350 from 2020, they lost a 600+k player they were paying 350k for. That 350k will mean sweet FA in the cap situation and that move has greatly weakened the team.
I'm still at a loss to know what Wests got from the "deal". Apart from shafted. again. By poor management. Again.
Just like what Geo said... What's the matter son didn't want to be here so he was released... he will just cause a heap of problems and that WEAKENS the team
geez some people don't look at the whole picture... shortsightedness ???
@NT_Tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085111) said:Yes, plenty on here just seem to leapfrog the detail and jump straight into their preconceived opinions. But hey this is a forum, and a pretty entertaining one at that.
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085056) said:@Russell said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085051) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1084888) said:@2041 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1084886) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1084877) said:@Newtown said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1084875) said:do you really think that the club with over a $million CAP space hasn’t a contingency plan?
Honestly, I don't believe we have a contingency plan.
Already been reported on nrl.com that we're now in for JAC.
so...we badly need a fullback so we're looking to sign a winger?
In your own words...
"You have to grab these top line players when they are available"
Now you are saying don't grab them...Sheeesh!!!!!
You don't think we should allocate some money to our spine? We have no fullback, we have no hooker. You're ok with that?
@JD-Tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085105) said:@ElleryHanley said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085098) said:@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085089) said:@tigerbalm said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085087) said:@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085082) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085078) said:@TheDaBoss said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085049) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085044) said:We released Matterson and Marsters early and now our best hope is to POSSIBLY sign Luciano Leilua and Zane Musgrove. I think this leaves us with a weaker squad than 2019. Paying $2000 for Season Tickets to NOT make the Semis again is a decision that will haunt me
Luciano is 100% with us, all pieces are falling in place and the Pom confirmed it
But we were told "We won't be releasing Matterson early unless it benefits Wests Tigers" we've negatively impacted our squad by releasing him BEFORE we had a better player secured.
It benefited us by not having to pay him a cent from his 2020 contract when we did...meanwhile the Rorters are paying Mitchell 14K a week to go fishing
That makes zero sense, Maybe I'm missing something.
Wests had a player who was worth ~ double what they were playing him but had a contract. That's sports. They did not have to release him but if they did, they would want market value for him, not what his contract was for.
So no, they didn't save 350 from 2020, they lost a 600+k player they were paying 350k for. That 350k will mean sweet FA in the cap situation and that move has greatly weakened the team.
I'm still at a loss to know what Wests got from the "deal". Apart from shafted. again. By poor management. Again.
A player that didn't want to be here..that always works well..it allowed us to go in the market for Luciano Leulia
Very tough one as matterson sulked...
But basically we have replaced a fringe origin forward and our best player, with a hugely overweight St George bench player.
I know Matterson made it difficult / impossible, but you just get the feeling Bellamy / Bennet / Rorters would have got a better result.
We will soon see how Bellamy handles exactly that, with JAC. He signed a contract (albeit with Storm), a part of me wants him to honour that.
@Russell said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085115) said:We know your feelings Avo.
However I cannot understand a person who labels someone an idiot and then asks them any type of question.
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085120) said:@Russell said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085115) said:We know your feelings Avo.
However I cannot understand a person who labels someone an idiot and then asks them any type of question.
I was joking, responding to your message. No offence was meant. Apologies if you thought I was being serious.
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085120) said:@Russell said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085115) said:We know your feelings Avo.
However I cannot understand a person who labels someone an idiot and then asks them any type of question.
I was joking, responding to your message. No offence was meant. Apologies if you thought I was being serious.
@hobbo1 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085088) said:Thank Christ that’s over ..
Mitchell’s a flog ..ain’t worth 1 million
@teddy23 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085118) said:Not gonna lie.... I’m absolutely gutted that it looks like we won’t be signing Latrell
Would’ve been an excellent pickup - however I’m still hoping that maybe some representatives are on the phone with Latrell directly and maybe trying to see where his head is at
@teddy23 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085118) said:Not gonna lie.... I’m absolutely gutted that it looks like we won’t be signing Latrell
Would’ve been an excellent pickup - however I’m still hoping that maybe some representatives are on the phone with Latrell directly and maybe trying to see where his head is at
@supercoach said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085127) said:@teddy23 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085118) said:Not gonna lie.... I’m absolutely gutted that it looks like we won’t be signing Latrell
Would’ve been an excellent pickup - however I’m still hoping that maybe some representatives are on the phone with Latrell directly and maybe trying to see where his head is at
Million to one things will be turned around. Politely shut the door and move on. We were always the last choice.p
@teddy23 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085118) said:Not gonna lie.... I’m absolutely gutted that it looks like we won’t be signing Latrell
Would’ve been an excellent pickup - however I’m still hoping that maybe some representatives are on the phone with Latrell directly and maybe trying to see where his head is at