@tigerbalm said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090217) said:
How are people still debating if LM would be a good signing? If he only lives up to a fraction of what we expect, he’s still a better No.1 option. Plus he kicks.
Plus! The club just needs a “win”. Signing LM would do wonders for members, sponsors and the general feel for the club. Worried that he’s “unproven” in fullback just boggles the mind. If the club is lucky enough to convince the kid to play for the tigers it would be a master stroke ( or a large bag or cash) either way, win win.
A lot of people are using primary school level Rugby League knowledge to hide their true feelings that they just don't like this guy. Or any ego players for that matter. Happy to finish 9th this lot.
More important to be a "good bloke" than have talent.
With you there Pat. There's not much out there and we have a cap allowance to spend. Best off taking one of the best proven names in the market. He has everything we lack. Nonsense about not singing the anthem and taking his time making decisions are not legitimate reasons not to have him here.
We will be a better team for having him here.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, the only thing I hate about the bloke is the jersey he's worn for the last four seasons. That would evaporate if he wore ours.