Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Newtown said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099665) said:
@Don_Kershane said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099565) said:
Crowe probably met LM half way in negotiating deal. Kempsey I would imagine.

I am sure that Crowe wouldn't have driven to Kempsey and back like the WT's guys were reported to have done.

Perhaps he came down from Nana Glen by truck with a few head of cattle-couldn't find a paper bag big enough.
 
@cochise said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099663) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099656) said:
@formerguest said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099619) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099550) said:
He was a fill in

And that is in your own words and I don't recall anyone here saying that he doesn't fill that role well, nor give his all to it. Surely all supporters don't want a fill in playing at the back, unless of course he is doing just that, filling in.


Mbye was meant to be the fullback, Thomo filled in and then replaced Mbye at the role For the remainder of the season, how is someone saying he is an awful fullback NOT saying he didn’t fill the fullback role well?
Saying he is an awful fullback implies that he filled the role terribly.
IMO, he played well, added some X-Factor and showed his pure class as a footballer.
Yes I said he was a fill in, that is because he was, by all means, I’m not saying he should be our long term fullback, just saying that he filled the position when asked in a pretty decent fashion, now ppl want to compare him to other specialist fullbacks, and label him the worst fullback in the NRL, it’s Disrespectful, immature and just ridiculous.



@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099656) said:
@formerguest said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099619) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099550) said:
He was a fill in

And that is in your own words and I don't recall anyone here saying that he doesn't fill that role well, nor give his all to it. Surely all supporters don't want a fill in playing at the back, unless of course he is doing just that, filling in.


Mbye was meant to be the fullback, Thomo filled in and then replaced Mbye at the role For the remainder of the season, how is someone saying he is an awful fullback NOT saying he didn’t fill the fullback role well?
Saying he is an awful fullback implies that he filled the role terribly.
IMO, he played well, added some X-Factor and showed his pure class as a footballer.
Yes I said he was a fill in, that is because he was, by all means, I’m not saying he should be our long term fullback, just saying that he filled the position when asked in a pretty decent fashion, now ppl want to compare him to other specialist fullbacks, and label him the worst fullback in the NRL, it’s Disrespectful, immature and just ridiculous.

Yes he is a fill in! Going into a season with 50% of your spine players being fill ins shows poor planning and is a recipe for a wooden spoon!


That’s irrelevant to what I initially said.
 
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099656) said:
@formerguest said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099619) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099550) said:
He was a fill in

And that is in your own words and I don't recall anyone here saying that he doesn't fill that role well, nor give his all to it. Surely all supporters don't want a fill in playing at the back, unless of course he is doing just that, filling in.


Mbye was meant to be the fullback, Thomo filled in and then replaced Mbye at the role For the remainder of the season, how is someone saying he is an awful fullback NOT saying he didn’t fill the fullback role well?
Saying he is an awful fullback implies that he filled the role terribly.
IMO, he played well, added some X-Factor and showed his pure class as a footballer.
Yes I said he was a fill in, that is because he was, by all means, I’m not saying he should be our long term fullback, just saying that he filled the position when asked in a pretty decent fashion, now ppl want to compare him to other specialist fullbacks, and label him the worst fullback in the NRL, it’s Disrespectful, immature and just ridiculous.

I like the guy, heaping praise on his application and have no major problem with his contract extension for his back up role, if it's not too much above minimum. I don't think he is an awful player, but that doesn't change the fact that some people on here are championing him to be our starting fullback and many others think that is an awful choice or option.
 
@Newtown said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099671) said:
@Tigerjan said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099664) said:
Someone just let go on Pascoe on Twitter


MadMudgeeTiger

@MadMudgeeTiger
·
4h


@JustinPascoeWT
.. I hope this makes you realise how undesirable
@WestsTigers
is as a destination for top NRL talent. Enough with the lip service. Fans deserve better.! Fix it or we need someone who can.!


3




2








Justin Pascoe

@JustinPascoeWT


Replying to
@MadMudgeeTiger
and
@WestsTigers
As I have stated before , we pulled the offer off the table some time ago. Fans deserve to have players playing for the club that they love and want to Play for and will do anything for and we have 27 signed in the top 30 of them at the club at the moment with 3 more to go

I fully agree with Justin. Paying a disinterested play $1 mil a year every year for 4 years would have sent Wests Tigers to habitual wooden spooners.

Well said
Pretty sure the titans already tried it with Ash Taylor.didnt work for them
 
@formerguest said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099675) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099656) said:
@formerguest said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099619) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099550) said:
He was a fill in

And that is in your own words and I don't recall anyone here saying that he doesn't fill that role well, nor give his all to it. Surely all supporters don't want a fill in playing at the back, unless of course he is doing just that, filling in.


Mbye was meant to be the fullback, Thomo filled in and then replaced Mbye at the role For the remainder of the season, how is someone saying he is an awful fullback NOT saying he didn’t fill the fullback role well?
Saying he is an awful fullback implies that he filled the role terribly.
IMO, he played well, added some X-Factor and showed his pure class as a footballer.
Yes I said he was a fill in, that is because he was, by all means, I’m not saying he should be our long term fullback, just saying that he filled the position when asked in a pretty decent fashion, now ppl want to compare him to other specialist fullbacks, and label him the worst fullback in the NRL, it’s Disrespectful, immature and just ridiculous.

I like the guy, heaping praise on his application and have no major problem with his contract extension for his back up role if not too much above minimum. I don't think he is an awful player, but that doesn't change that the fact that some people on here are championing him to be our starting fullback and many others think that is an awful choice or option.

Anyone saying Corey Thompson is an awful fullback needs to watch more football, because one should know he isn’t a specialist fullback, therefore would admire his talent, and yes even as a fullback- I seriously loved watching him play in that position.
Then to compare him to other specialist fullback is just silly.
Should he be our long term fullback? No, we need a specialist fullback but in saying that I feel it’s unfair to Corey to have him judged against specialist fullbacks, I wouldn’t be upset if he was our fullback for the up coming season, I feel he would show improvement.
 
@Elderslie_Tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099676) said:
So we missed out on LM he's not the first and won't be last let's bury this thread and all you keyboard coaches and chief executives with it

You want to bury all of us? That’s a bit extreme.
 
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099678) said:
@formerguest said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099675) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099656) said:
@formerguest said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099619) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099550) said:
He was a fill in

And that is in your own words and I don't recall anyone here saying that he doesn't fill that role well, nor give his all to it. Surely all supporters don't want a fill in playing at the back, unless of course he is doing just that, filling in.


Mbye was meant to be the fullback, Thomo filled in and then replaced Mbye at the role For the remainder of the season, how is someone saying he is an awful fullback NOT saying he didn’t fill the fullback role well?
Saying he is an awful fullback implies that he filled the role terribly.
IMO, he played well, added some X-Factor and showed his pure class as a footballer.
Yes I said he was a fill in, that is because he was, by all means, I’m not saying he should be our long term fullback, just saying that he filled the position when asked in a pretty decent fashion, now ppl want to compare him to other specialist fullbacks, and label him the worst fullback in the NRL, it’s Disrespectful, immature and just ridiculous.

I like the guy, heaping praise on his application and have no major problem with his contract extension for his back up role if not too much above minimum. I don't think he is an awful player, but that doesn't change that the fact that some people on here are championing him to be our starting fullback and many others think that is an awful choice or option.

Anyone saying Corey Thompson is an awful fullback needs to watch more football, because one should know he isn’t a specialist fullback, therefore would admire his talent, and yes even as a fullback- I seriously loved watching him play in that position.
Then to compare him to other specialist fullback is just silly.
Should he be our long term fullback? No, we need a specialist fullback but in saying that I feel it’s unfair to Corey to have him judged against specialist fullbacks, I wouldn’t be upset if he was our fullback for the up coming season, I feel he would show improvement.

Last comment on Cory and that is he was always a fullback, right up until his opponents were at a playing level that he could not longer compete with as one.
 
@Elderslie_Tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099676) said:
So we missed out on LM he's not the first and won't be last let's bury this thread and all you keyboard coaches and chief executives with it

Us!
You said you, and it's us.
 
@Newtown said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099671) said:
@Tigerjan said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099664) said:
Someone just let go on Pascoe on Twitter


MadMudgeeTiger

@MadMudgeeTiger
·
4h


@JustinPascoeWT
.. I hope this makes you realise how undesirable
@WestsTigers
is as a destination for top NRL talent. Enough with the lip service. Fans deserve better.! Fix it or we need someone who can.!


3




2








Justin Pascoe

@JustinPascoeWT


Replying to
@MadMudgeeTiger
and
@WestsTigers
As I have stated before , we pulled the offer off the table some time ago. Fans deserve to have players playing for the club that they love and want to Play for and will do anything for and we have 27 signed in the top 30 of them at the club at the moment with 3 more to go

I fully agree with Justin. Paying a disinterested play $1 mil a year every year for 4 years would have sent Wests Tigers to habitual wooden spooners.

Let go??? hahahaha I'm sure it rattled Pascoe.....Pascoe shot him down quite easily.......
 
The Roosters and Tigers will be laughing at the end of this season, the clown failed to buy insurance, one year deal, wait for the season ending injury and he’ll have plenty of time to look and question the man in the mirror when the knock at the door fails to materialise.
JAC should be our priority.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099661) said:
This is true, but LM’s bad days are better than CT’s best days.

What nonsense ! I recall a one off test at the end of 2018 against the Kiwis in which LM opposed Joey Manu. It was a tight game. The Kiwis scored three tries and won the match.

For the first try Manu beat LM pointless and scored. For the second try LM couldn't close down Manu and he put the winger over. For the third try LM, under no pressure dropped the ball on the half way line and the Kiwis went six tackles and scored.

After the match I was trying to remember when I last saw an Australian player singlehandedly lose a test for Australia.

LM has been underwhelming in representative matches. The difference between his best and worst performances is substantial. He is no Messiah !
 
@fibrodreaming said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099688) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099661) said:
This is true, but LM’s bad days are better than CT’s best days.

What nonsense ! I recall a one off test at the end of 2018 against the Kiwis in which LM opposed Joey Manu. It was a tight game. The Kiwis scored three tries and won the match.

For the first try Manu beat LM pointless and scored. For the second try LM couldn't close down Manu and he put the winger over. For the third try LM, under no pressure dropped the ball on the half way line and the Kiwis went six tackles and scored.

After the match I was trying to remember when I last saw an Australian player singlehandedly lose a test for Australia.

LM has been underwhelming in representative matches. The difference between his best and worst performances is substantial. He is no Messiah !

In your opinion.
 
@OzLuke said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099638) said:
If we do end up landing AJ, whilst he is certainly no bust your guts superstar, he is ahead of a few of our first graders. He will create competition for spots amongst our backs, and has the experience of playing finals football recently.
I can't see harm from him being in our squad at the right price. He would probably also come here with a chip on his shoulder and be looking to prove some things.

Bugger competition for spots, I'm sick of hearing it.

We have had plenty of competition for spots over the years because all of our players are ok, but not representative players.

I'd prefer having representative players cementing their position than have two mid range players battling it out.
 
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099674) said:
@cochise said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099663) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099656) said:
@formerguest said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099619) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099550) said:
He was a fill in

And that is in your own words and I don't recall anyone here saying that he doesn't fill that role well, nor give his all to it. Surely all supporters don't want a fill in playing at the back, unless of course he is doing just that, filling in.


Mbye was meant to be the fullback, Thomo filled in and then replaced Mbye at the role For the remainder of the season, how is someone saying he is an awful fullback NOT saying he didn’t fill the fullback role well?
Saying he is an awful fullback implies that he filled the role terribly.
IMO, he played well, added some X-Factor and showed his pure class as a footballer.
Yes I said he was a fill in, that is because he was, by all means, I’m not saying he should be our long term fullback, just saying that he filled the position when asked in a pretty decent fashion, now ppl want to compare him to other specialist fullbacks, and label him the worst fullback in the NRL, it’s Disrespectful, immature and just ridiculous.



@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099656) said:
@formerguest said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099619) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099550) said:
He was a fill in

And that is in your own words and I don't recall anyone here saying that he doesn't fill that role well, nor give his all to it. Surely all supporters don't want a fill in playing at the back, unless of course he is doing just that, filling in.


Mbye was meant to be the fullback, Thomo filled in and then replaced Mbye at the role For the remainder of the season, how is someone saying he is an awful fullback NOT saying he didn’t fill the fullback role well?
Saying he is an awful fullback implies that he filled the role terribly.
IMO, he played well, added some X-Factor and showed his pure class as a footballer.
Yes I said he was a fill in, that is because he was, by all means, I’m not saying he should be our long term fullback, just saying that he filled the position when asked in a pretty decent fashion, now ppl want to compare him to other specialist fullbacks, and label him the worst fullback in the NRL, it’s Disrespectful, immature and just ridiculous.

Yes he is a fill in! Going into a season with 50% of your spine players being fill ins shows poor planning and is a recipe for a wooden spoon!


That’s irrelevant to what I initially said.

As you have said he is a fill in at fullback, that means he is not a good fullback, if he was a good fullback than he wouldn't be a fill in he would just be a fullback!
 
@TonyTiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099684) said:
The Roosters and Tigers will be laughing at the end of this season, the clown failed to buy insurance, one year deal, wait for the season ending injury and he’ll have plenty of time to look and question the man in the mirror when the knock at the door fails to materialise.
JAC should be our priority.

Contract still not signed off on yet & hasn't been approved by NRL, but what a gronk if these reports are correct. Risking his families future tells me he's just a selfish little boy. His purported upgrade next year (in Souths' favour apparently) is dependent on who they can shift to accommodate his highness - teammates who have been shopped around while on holiday & without their knowledge. Easts have been home for him since he was 16, they wanted to pay him $800,000 this year - instead he rinses them for $116,000 while he goes fishing - then agrees to a contract with the enemy, for $200,000 less then what Easts originally offered him, zero guarantees - you can't make this up. Latrell could have set his young family up for life and then moved to Souths later in his career. All it takes is 1 injury and he's yesterday's news, crazy.
 
@Ponyo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099694) said:
@TonyTiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099684) said:
The Roosters and Tigers will be laughing at the end of this season, the clown failed to buy insurance, one year deal, wait for the season ending injury and he’ll have plenty of time to look and question the man in the mirror when the knock at the door fails to materialise.
JAC should be our priority.

Contract still not signed off on yet & hasn't been approved by NRL, but what a gronk if these reports are correct. Risking his families future tells me he's just a selfish little boy. His purported upgrade next year (in Souths' favour apparently) is dependent on who they can shift to accommodate his highness - teammates who have been shopped around while on holiday & without their knowledge. Easts have been home for him since he was 16, they wanted to pay him $800,000 this year - instead he rinses them for $116,000 while he goes fishing - then agrees to a contract with the enemy, for $200,000 less then what Easts originally offered him, zero guarantees - you can't make this up. Latrell could have set his young family up for life and then moved to Souths later in his career. All it takes is 1 injury and he's yesterday's news, crazy.

Great post
 
@Ponyo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099694) said:
@TonyTiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099684) said:
The Roosters and Tigers will be laughing at the end of this season, the clown failed to buy insurance, one year deal, wait for the season ending injury and he’ll have plenty of time to look and question the man in the mirror when the knock at the door fails to materialise.
JAC should be our priority.

Contract still not signed off on yet & hasn't been approved by NRL, but what a gronk if these reports are correct. Risking his families future tells me he's just a selfish little boy. His purported upgrade next year (in Souths' favour apparently) is dependent on who they can shift to accommodate his highness - teammates who have been shopped around while on holiday & without their knowledge. Easts have been home for him since he was 16, they wanted to pay him $800,000 this year - instead he rinses them for $116,000 while he goes fishing - then agrees to a contract with the enemy, for $200,000 less then what Easts originally offered him, zero guarantees - you can't make this up. Latrell could have set his young family up for life and then moved to Souths later in his career. All it takes is 1 injury and he's yesterday's news, crazy.

And to think he went to market to make "more" money for his family...it doesn't add up
 
@cochise said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099693) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099674) said:
@cochise said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099663) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099656) said:
@formerguest said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099619) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099550) said:
He was a fill in

And that is in your own words and I don't recall anyone here saying that he doesn't fill that role well, nor give his all to it. Surely all supporters don't want a fill in playing at the back, unless of course he is doing just that, filling in.


Mbye was meant to be the fullback, Thomo filled in and then replaced Mbye at the role For the remainder of the season, how is someone saying he is an awful fullback NOT saying he didn’t fill the fullback role well?
Saying he is an awful fullback implies that he filled the role terribly.
IMO, he played well, added some X-Factor and showed his pure class as a footballer.
Yes I said he was a fill in, that is because he was, by all means, I’m not saying he should be our long term fullback, just saying that he filled the position when asked in a pretty decent fashion, now ppl want to compare him to other specialist fullbacks, and label him the worst fullback in the NRL, it’s Disrespectful, immature and just ridiculous.



@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099656) said:
@formerguest said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099619) said:
@Chaos said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099550) said:
He was a fill in

And that is in your own words and I don't recall anyone here saying that he doesn't fill that role well, nor give his all to it. Surely all supporters don't want a fill in playing at the back, unless of course he is doing just that, filling in.


Mbye was meant to be the fullback, Thomo filled in and then replaced Mbye at the role For the remainder of the season, how is someone saying he is an awful fullback NOT saying he didn’t fill the fullback role well?
Saying he is an awful fullback implies that he filled the role terribly.
IMO, he played well, added some X-Factor and showed his pure class as a footballer.
Yes I said he was a fill in, that is because he was, by all means, I’m not saying he should be our long term fullback, just saying that he filled the position when asked in a pretty decent fashion, now ppl want to compare him to other specialist fullbacks, and label him the worst fullback in the NRL, it’s Disrespectful, immature and just ridiculous.

Yes he is a fill in! Going into a season with 50% of your spine players being fill ins shows poor planning and is a recipe for a wooden spoon!


That’s irrelevant to what I initially said.

As you have said he is a fill in at fullback, that means he is not a good fullback, if he was a good fullback than he wouldn't be a fill in he would just be a fullback!

Your logic is laughable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top