Spud_Murphy
New member
He probably won't end up playing anywhere and this whole circus will be moot. Will probably give the game away I reckon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@LeichhardtTiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099860) said:https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/nrl/hollywood-treatment-not-enough-to-lure-latrell-mitchell/news-story/f59d8ae1320ddce91fbda1db1312253a
Not happening at Souffs
@marzie said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099866) said:**So Roosters waive 200k in fees if LM signs with us
That's 500k-600k he'd lose in 2020 by signing with Souths
Still reckon we can get him, hopefully Madge and Pascoe are taking advantage of the situation**
The next 7 days should be pretty interesting
We just really need that 1 marquee signing to get the ball rolling. If we can sign LM you'd think that would all but guarantee JAC as well who will be granted a release at the end of 2020 at the latest
Plus COE next year with a tonne of cap money to spend
@Spud_Murphy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099869) said:@marzie said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099866) said:**So Roosters waive 200k in fees if LM signs with us
That's 500k-600k he'd lose in 2020 by signing with Souths
Still reckon we can get him, hopefully Madge and Pascoe are taking advantage of the situation**
The next 7 days should be pretty interesting
We just really need that 1 marquee signing to get the ball rolling. If we can sign LM you'd think that would all but guarantee JAC as well who will be granted a release at the end of 2020 at the latest
Plus COE next year with a tonne of cap money to spend
With all that advantage to us it would be pretty poor result if he didn't sign, but he seems to be doing everything but sign with us.
@Spud_Murphy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099869) said:@marzie said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099866) said:**So Roosters waive 200k in fees if LM signs with us
That's 500k-600k he'd lose in 2020 by signing with Souths
Still reckon we can get him, hopefully Madge and Pascoe are taking advantage of the situation**
The next 7 days should be pretty interesting
We just really need that 1 marquee signing to get the ball rolling. If we can sign LM you'd think that would all but guarantee JAC as well who will be granted a release at the end of 2020 at the latest
Plus COE next year with a tonne of cap money to spend
With all that advantage to us it would be pretty poor result if he didn't sign, but he seems to be doing everything but sign with us.
@ElleryHanley said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099875) said:@Spud_Murphy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099869) said:@marzie said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099866) said:**So Roosters waive 200k in fees if LM signs with us
That's 500k-600k he'd lose in 2020 by signing with Souths
Still reckon we can get him, hopefully Madge and Pascoe are taking advantage of the situation**
The next 7 days should be pretty interesting
We just really need that 1 marquee signing to get the ball rolling. If we can sign LM you'd think that would all but guarantee JAC as well who will be granted a release at the end of 2020 at the latest
Plus COE next year with a tonne of cap money to spend
With all that advantage to us it would be pretty poor result if he didn't sign, but he seems to be doing everything but sign with us.
We have said we are not calling him again...
Modern players won't do the begging.....we should be on the phone and proactive.
Imagine if the Clippers sat there and said 'Kawhi can call us if he wants to chat'?
All these agents follow the American model. I don't necessarily subscribe to it, but it is reality.
Pick up the phone, be aggressive...sell the Tigers message...sell us as a place a player would want to come...
Don't just say 'well, they can call us if they want'.
@Cairnstigers said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099878) said:We don't need to grovel any more then we have
Latrell knows we want him
Every rugby league fan on this planet knows we want him
We are not going to kiss his backside and beg him to come
If he wants the money he will come
But after all the charades I am not sure it is such a good idea anymore
I just don't think he has a clear head and that will affect his game for some time to come
@weststigers said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099879) said:@Cairnstigers said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099878) said:We don't need to grovel any more then we have
Latrell knows we want him
Every rugby league fan on this planet knows we want him
We are not going to kiss his backside and beg him to come
If he wants the money he will come
But after all the charades I am not sure it is such a good idea anymore
I just don't think he has a clear head and that will affect his game for some time to come
He's negotiating in the mould of SBW and Hayne...guys that think they are bigger than the game. Hope this whole experience brings him down to Earth, but I won't be holding my breath.
For a guy that could have set himself up on a million bucks a year, he seems to have totally botched it.
I wonder if his pride will get in the way of dialing Tigers HQ to revisit that $1 million contract he was offered?
@Curaeus said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099855) said:Webster reported that Souths opening offer was well below Mitchell's expectations (what a surprise) and that Mitchell's new agent had already made a counter offer. You'd think it would have to be a very very good one. Seems it is all about the money after all!
@ElleryHanley said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099875) said:@Spud_Murphy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099869) said:@marzie said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099866) said:**So Roosters waive 200k in fees if LM signs with us
That's 500k-600k he'd lose in 2020 by signing with Souths
Still reckon we can get him, hopefully Madge and Pascoe are taking advantage of the situation**
The next 7 days should be pretty interesting
We just really need that 1 marquee signing to get the ball rolling. If we can sign LM you'd think that would all but guarantee JAC as well who will be granted a release at the end of 2020 at the latest
Plus COE next year with a tonne of cap money to spend
With all that advantage to us it would be pretty poor result if he didn't sign, but he seems to be doing everything but sign with us.
We have said we are not calling him again...
Modern players won't do the begging.....we should be on the phone and proactive.
Imagine if the Clippers sat there and said 'Kawhi can call us if he wants to chat'?
All these agents follow the American model. I don't necessarily subscribe to it, but it is reality.
Pick up the phone, be aggressive...sell the Tigers message...sell us as a place a player would want to come...
Don't just say 'well, they can call us if they want'.
@Spud_Murphy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099810) said:@willow said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099808) said:It's getting to the point now where he won't be fit when he takes the field, regardless of where he ends up.
Exactly! I’m starting to think that he may not even play rugby league at all this year. His interest in actually getting into it seems to be non-existent.
@AnnandaleTiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099773) said:I’d happily have latrell for Just one year, even if he decided to go to Souths.
Sometimes players can enjoy it and want to stay. Happens in the US frequently
@Curaeus said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099855) said:Webster reported that Souths opening offer was well below Mitchell's expectations (what a surprise) and that Mitchell's new agent had already made a counter offer. You'd think it would have to be a very very good one. Seems it is all about the money after all!