Luke Brooks

Status
Not open for further replies.
@twentyforty said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422250) said:
Gosh! Some of the rubbish in the media lately? Crazy stuff!!
Why would a struggling team get rid of their best player šŸ˜‚

So another team which is losing a halfback can get a halfback.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422251) said:
@twentyforty said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422250) said:
Gosh! Some of the rubbish in the media lately? Crazy stuff!!
Why would a struggling team get rid of their best player ?

So another team which is losing a halfback can get a halfback.

I don't think they bought Hastings to play anywhere but 5/8.
At that time , we had Mbye who wasn't performing. AD has shown promise in this area, and who plays where will depends on how they all perform next year.
As for the Brooks haters, i have yet to see your possible replacement 1/2. Please show me your wisdom.
Hastings and AD together? Please press the fast forward button to add some speed ! Well maybe buy another half ?
WHO ? We have trouble buying anyone, and the top halves are in the million a year bracket, and won't come here anyway.
 
I have to admit that I was annoyed with how Brooks was playing for so many years, but this year I am happy with how he is playing.

He could improve alot and hold the ball more and have his own runs - but really comparing him towards everyone else in the same position in the league, I believe he is in the top 3.
 
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422235) said:
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422062) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421637) said:
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421576) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421427) said:
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421389) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421340) said:
First time I've ever cheered for the Sharks and Raiders.

Why exactly?

I feel like it’s been repeated a billion times, but until we get someone better that would be terrible business. Nobody even knows if Hastings will cut it in the NRL, he sure as hell didn’t in the 48 games he played for 2 fairly strong clubs

Play the ball not the man.

Been waiting 9 long years for Brooks to get us anywhere.
Every excuse in the book has been used to gloss over the fact that he just doesn’t have it.
I’d gladly take a chat on Hastings than live through more years of mediocrity.
Besides, who knows who else might be in the wings?

You have no idea . It’s just because you’re sick of him, nothing to do with his ability. You and snake dislike him so much , it’s to a point of being personal . Or you have an issue with his family . It’s hate for hates sake , hidden by a thin visage of it being about ā€œmediocrityā€.

The closest thing I have to brooks was , when he was at holy Cross , I lived around the corner from there . Before you call me his mother or uncle or whatever family member lol

Ever thought of writing fiction stories?
You don’t even seem to read a post before jumping in to defend your old mate Luke and waffling on without actually addressing the post.
I don’t hate him, nor do I have any issues with him that don’t relate to his value to the team.
You can dream up any scenario you want to justify criticism levelled towards him but none of it relates to hate… and really, who cares what your relationship to him might be?
I hope he leaves and will wish him well wherever he ends up.
But then again, you are the self appointed expert…I have no idea.

LOL whatever champ! Self appointed expert ? Because I point out how crap your takes are ? That doesn’t make me an expert . Far from it . I’m just giving you , what you gave me , for no reason. Tell us again how Hastings is better than brooks . How youre smarter than the whole nrl ? No one is death riding Hastings , that’s some next level Nadia Cominci type mental gymnastics there buddy. We are calling out people like you , who are actively death riding brooks .

Lol ... '**We** are calling out people like you".
Quick, get the posse together!
Listen, it's ok to be a fanboy ... you, and everyone else are welcome to their opinion.
I wish Brooks nothing but the best if he were to leave.
There's been too many years of hoping and praying he would develop into the halfback we need.
But he hasn't....and he won't.
The team needs a change ... and Hastings will be here next year to put the pressure on your hero, whether you like it or not.
Maybe he'll thrive or maybe he won't.
Now, better hand out the pitchforks to all those others you have gathered together against people 'like me'.

Pitchforks ? God I dislike you ! Your the one participating in the mob champ ! If you remember it was me , sleeve , paws , and a few others , refusing to participate in the mob storming Frankensteins castle . Your basing how you feel , as if they’re facts . And their not . I’ve said it before , ā€œI’m sick of seeing him , so he’s the reason we lose ā€œ . That’s literally what you just said . It’s time for something newā€. Why ? Give me a football reason why . Not a , ā€œI’m over himā€ . You cant . Because you don’t know ! It’s that simple .
 
@crucible said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422245) said:
WARNING, WARNING, WARNING::::: The Luke Brooks PR Team are in overdrive. Any Forum Member that states anything factually correct will be eliminated. You have been warned!!!!!!

Isn't a crucible an empty vessel ? So fitting i think.
 
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421732) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421728) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421723) said:
@weststigerman said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421720) said:
@needaname said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421718) said:
Hoops spilled on NRL 360.

My big question is. Who are these rouge Tigers ā€˜officials’ that believe that can make recruitment and retention calls between clubs?

What he said is total rubbish. The real question is who leaks this stuff.

What did he say, I don't really watch the talking head shows as I rate my opinion higher than theirs lol

A tigers official called Canberra and said we offer you Luke Brooks and mbye for wighton and Hodgon then they all began to laugh

I just saw it, I don't believe that for a second.

Yeah I'm calling BS on that. There's no way that would happen.
 
@crucible said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422245) said:
WARNING, WARNING, WARNING::::: The Luke Brooks PR Team are in overdrive. Any Forum Member that states anything factually correct will be eliminated. You have been warned!!!!!!

I would think "factually correct" info would be more than welcome, as long as its proven?
 
@tigerwest said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422362) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422337) said:
can we offer Hastings to another club - Canberra perhaps

That's a strange thing to contemplate? Why would want to do that?

keep Brooks and Douhie and try and sell Hastings for someone maybe a Lomax or something
wouldn't happen I know but do we really need Hastings probably not in the halves so he becomes a utility when we already have potentially Liddle/Simpkin
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422367) said:
@tigerwest said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422362) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422337) said:
can we offer Hastings to another club - Canberra perhaps

That's a strange thing to contemplate? Why would want to do that?

keep Brooks and Douhie and try and sell Hastings for someone maybe a Lomax or something
wouldn't happen I know but do we really need Hastings probably not in the halves so he becomes a utility when we already have potentially Liddle/Simpkin

But we have he cash to basically buy anyone we want?

I see the Mbye as a utility, a better proposition than a second hooker, because he has better cover of the backs as well?
 
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422289) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422235) said:
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422062) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421637) said:
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421576) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421427) said:
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421389) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421340) said:
First time I've ever cheered for the Sharks and Raiders.

Why exactly?

I feel like it’s been repeated a billion times, but until we get someone better that would be terrible business. Nobody even knows if Hastings will cut it in the NRL, he sure as hell didn’t in the 48 games he played for 2 fairly strong clubs

Play the ball not the man.

Been waiting 9 long years for Brooks to get us anywhere.
Every excuse in the book has been used to gloss over the fact that he just doesn’t have it.
I’d gladly take a chat on Hastings than live through more years of mediocrity.
Besides, who knows who else might be in the wings?

You have no idea . It’s just because you’re sick of him, nothing to do with his ability. You and snake dislike him so much , it’s to a point of being personal . Or you have an issue with his family . It’s hate for hates sake , hidden by a thin visage of it being about ā€œmediocrityā€.

The closest thing I have to brooks was , when he was at holy Cross , I lived around the corner from there . Before you call me his mother or uncle or whatever family member lol

Ever thought of writing fiction stories?
You don’t even seem to read a post before jumping in to defend your old mate Luke and waffling on without actually addressing the post.
I don’t hate him, nor do I have any issues with him that don’t relate to his value to the team.
You can dream up any scenario you want to justify criticism levelled towards him but none of it relates to hate… and really, who cares what your relationship to him might be?
I hope he leaves and will wish him well wherever he ends up.
But then again, you are the self appointed expert…I have no idea.

LOL whatever champ! Self appointed expert ? Because I point out how crap your takes are ? That doesn’t make me an expert . Far from it . I’m just giving you , what you gave me , for no reason. Tell us again how Hastings is better than brooks . How youre smarter than the whole nrl ? No one is death riding Hastings , that’s some next level Nadia Cominci type mental gymnastics there buddy. We are calling out people like you , who are actively death riding brooks .

Lol ... '**We** are calling out people like you".
Quick, get the posse together!
Listen, it's ok to be a fanboy ... you, and everyone else are welcome to their opinion.
I wish Brooks nothing but the best if he were to leave.
There's been too many years of hoping and praying he would develop into the halfback we need.
But he hasn't....and he won't.
The team needs a change ... and Hastings will be here next year to put the pressure on your hero, whether you like it or not.
Maybe he'll thrive or maybe he won't.
Now, better hand out the pitchforks to all those others you have gathered together against people 'like me'.

Pitchforks ? God I dislike you ! Your the one participating in the mob champ ! If you remember it was me , sleeve , paws , and a few others , refusing to participate in the mob storming Frankensteins castle . Your basing how you feel , as if they’re facts . And their not . I’ve said it before , ā€œI’m sick of seeing him , so he’s the reason we lose ā€œ . That’s literally what you just said . It’s time for something newā€. Why ? Give me a football reason why . Not a , ā€œI’m over himā€ . You cant . Because you don’t know ! It’s that simple .

Lol… take it easy, your blood pressure must be getting way to high.
To answer a few things…
Basing anything about how I ā€˜feel’ is the same as it being my opinion.
It’s my opinion… and once again you’re free to have yours.
Yes, Brooks has improved his defence over the years, yes he has some pace.
A football reason why I think he should go?
Has he ever displayed anything that even looks like game management or shown he might lead us to a semis spot in the last 9 years?
No.
Is he a noted try scorer or kicker?
No.
Does he inspire the players around him when the going gets tough?
No.
Has he improved when obstacles (players/coaches), supposedly holding him back, are removed so he can say he owns the team?
No.
Is it time to try something new?
Of course.
That’s my opinion… obviously it won’t be yours.
Live with it…. it’s not the end of the world.
 
@tigerwest said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422372) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422367) said:
@tigerwest said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422362) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422337) said:
can we offer Hastings to another club - Canberra perhaps

That's a strange thing to contemplate? Why would want to do that?

keep Brooks and Douhie and try and sell Hastings for someone maybe a Lomax or something
wouldn't happen I know but do we really need Hastings probably not in the halves so he becomes a utility when we already have potentially Liddle/Simpkin

But we have he cash to basically buy anyone we want?

I see the Mbye as a utility, a better proposition than a second hooker, because he has better cover of the backs as well?

we could grab lomax and then still have the cash for a Brandon Smith or something and haven't lost anything we have Maden in reserved if a half is needed
 
@sleeve said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422262) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422251) said:
@twentyforty said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422250) said:
Gosh! Some of the rubbish in the media lately? Crazy stuff!!
Why would a struggling team get rid of their best player ?

So another team which is losing a halfback can get a halfback.

I don't think they bought Hastings to play anywhere but 5/8.
At that time , we had Mbye who wasn't performing. AD has shown promise in this area, and who plays where will depends on how they all perform next year.
As for the Brooks haters, i have yet to see your possible replacement 1/2. Please show me your wisdom.
Hastings and AD together? Please press the fast forward button to add some speed ! Well maybe buy another half ?
WHO ? We have trouble buying anyone, and the top halves are in the million a year bracket, and won't come here anyway.

But Wests Tigers problems, all of them are personified by Luke Brooks. Once we get rid of Brooks then everything will magically become better, and we'll win a premiership. We don't even need a halfback, just throw anyone in there, even if they're worse, and it will still work out better. Makes sense.
 
@sleeve said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422091) said:
If Brooks was released, it could be the last straw for many supporters. The only consistent player in the side for a long time.

He’s been a bit up and down throughout his career but it’s no surprise to me that’s he’s playing consistently well behind some decent go forward, which we haven’t always had.

A few things on Brooks.

- nobody has ever accused the Tigers of not being able to score points while Brooks has been the chief playmaker. Too many critics of his attacking play while it’s clearly not our biggest struggle.

- he gets his body in front in defense and I’d say he’s one of the better defensive halves

- he is an introvert which isn’t necessarily a bad thing going forward when you consider Doueihi’s personality - they may just complement each other.

- he has had pretty weak second rowers to play alongside. Would be good to see him strike up a partnership with someone like TPJ.

If they move him on he’ll get a chance to play finals and I’d be happy to see him have success, and meanwhile we’ll hitch our trailer to Jackson Hastings. How Wests Tigers is that!
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422398) said:
@tigerwest said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422372) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422367) said:
@tigerwest said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422362) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422337) said:
can we offer Hastings to another club - Canberra perhaps

That's a strange thing to contemplate? Why would want to do that?

keep Brooks and Douhie and try and sell Hastings for someone maybe a Lomax or something
wouldn't happen I know but do we really need Hastings probably not in the halves so he becomes a utility when we already have potentially Liddle/Simpkin

But we have he cash to basically buy anyone we want?

I see the Mbye as a utility, a better proposition than a second hooker, because he has better cover of the backs as well?

we could grab lomax and then still have the cash for a Brandon Smith or something and haven't lost anything we have Maden in reserved if a half is needed


Neither of those guys will consider Wests
 
The repeated suggestions of this being the "last straw", or that you'd no longer support the Tigers if Brooks was shipped only typify the immaturity attributed to Brooks fandom and perpetuate the idea that not only is Brooks fandom irrational, but it is highly unproductive.

Fact is, if your support is so tied to this one player then you aren't a fan of Wests Tigers, you are just a fan of Luke Brooks.
 
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1422391) said:
That’s my opinion… obviously it won’t be yours.
Live with it…. it’s not the end of the world.

The different opinions are fine. It's when you and that other guy start making out that everyone else is a fan boy or not using facts or something equally stupid.

I'm glad Hastings is coming and I reckon Brooks has been our best player. We need to perform better. If Hastings is playing better than Brooks and Brooks gets dropped and we win more games I reckon that is awesome.

It's an opinion and your opinion is no better than any one else's. When you state stuff like you state though you come across as completely illogical. So what you accuse others of you are doing but in a much more extreme fashion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top