Tim Sheens
Well-known member
I remember getting myself and others getting downvoted for suggesting we don't extend Madge until results deserved such as we were getting worse.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@hsvjones said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346457) said:@mike said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346436) said:@voice_of_reason said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346396) said:@willow said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346365) said:There’s a feeling inside the club that the Tigers have a better and more balanced roster than they did in 2020, yet they are going backwards at a rate of knots. One of the questions set to be asked in the coming days is why perceived improvements in the roster aren’t being met with improvements in performance.
That's a fair enough assessment - most comments on here were the past off season has been our best in recent history for signings.
The question has to be asked why the performances aren't reflecting the improvement in roster.
**Madge has proven he can coach but it's looking less and less likely he's the right fit for us.**
I don't agree with the last sentence. Madge is trying to change the culture of the playing group. For way to long the players have had the say in running things and often to the overall detriment. Madge is trying to instil a winning culture. If Madge needs to break this playing group to achieve that cultural change then so be it. Those that don't buy in can leave. We have the break the cycle of letting the playing group get away with mediocrity, and then blaming the coach for their poor performance. The playing group need to be more professional in their approach and do what is needed to win.
Madge's hard nose approach is exactly what the club needs at this point in time. If it means we run last to do it then we run last. It's the cycle and culture that needs breaking and re-engineering.
If we change coaches now it might be a short term fix and we might achieve short term results but it won't fix the problem. We will remain a second tier team rather than a powerhouse.
Well said Mike and agree.. Unfortunately because it been like 10 years he will be gone and will make the jobs of others safe again ( same circle) ... The players need to be handed a realty check with the real world as what they dish up is a joke and all they want to do is offence not Defence. Fans and coaches would be happy to win 1-0 but our players want to win 46-44 and not put body on the line. Simple as that..
@formerguest said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346465) said:I remember getting myself and others getting downvoted for suggesting we don't extend Madge until results deserved such as we were getting worse.
@bathursttiger1 said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346464) said:@hobbo1 said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346439) said:@gnr4life said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346402) said:@the_patriot said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346399) said:I don't care how bad we are going, I'll never revert to giving Cleary any credit for his stunt here. Guy dogged all of us.
Just because you don’t want to, doesn’t mean he wasn’t good while he was here. Leaps and bounds above this guy.
Potter had us flying as well ...
Until RF intervened.
@bathursttiger1 said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346464) said:@hobbo1 said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346439) said:@gnr4life said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346402) said:@the_patriot said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346399) said:I don't care how bad we are going, I'll never revert to giving Cleary any credit for his stunt here. Guy dogged all of us.
Just because you don’t want to, doesn’t mean he wasn’t good while he was here. Leaps and bounds above this guy.
Potter had us flying as well ...
Until RF intervened.
@jc99 said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346473) said:How long until the board starts getting the sack
@formerguest said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346465) said:I remember getting myself and others getting downvoted for suggesting we don't extend Madge until results deserved such as we were getting worse.
@mike said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346467) said:@hsvjones said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346457) said:@mike said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346436) said:@voice_of_reason said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346396) said:@willow said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346365) said:There’s a feeling inside the club that the Tigers have a better and more balanced roster than they did in 2020, yet they are going backwards at a rate of knots. One of the questions set to be asked in the coming days is why perceived improvements in the roster aren’t being met with improvements in performance.
That's a fair enough assessment - most comments on here were the past off season has been our best in recent history for signings.
The question has to be asked why the performances aren't reflecting the improvement in roster.
**Madge has proven he can coach but it's looking less and less likely he's the right fit for us.**
I don't agree with the last sentence. Madge is trying to change the culture of the playing group. For way to long the players have had the say in running things and often to the overall detriment. Madge is trying to instil a winning culture. If Madge needs to break this playing group to achieve that cultural change then so be it. Those that don't buy in can leave. We have the break the cycle of letting the playing group get away with mediocrity, and then blaming the coach for their poor performance. The playing group need to be more professional in their approach and do what is needed to win.
Madge's hard nose approach is exactly what the club needs at this point in time. If it means we run last to do it then we run last. It's the cycle and culture that needs breaking and re-engineering.
If we change coaches now it might be a short term fix and we might achieve short term results but it won't fix the problem. We will remain a second tier team rather than a powerhouse.
Well said Mike and agree.. Unfortunately because it been like 10 years he will be gone and will make the jobs of others safe again ( same circle) ... The players need to be handed a realty check with the real world as what they dish up is a joke and all they want to do is offence not Defence. Fans and coaches would be happy to win 1-0 but our players want to win 46-44 and not put body on the line. Simple as that..
Then if he is gone it will be the same old same old. Nothing will ever change and no future coach would ever try again.
@wounded_magpie said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346482) said:I wonder if the film crew (doing the west’s tigers documentary ) will be allowed access to the boardroom over the next 48 hours.
It’s supposed to allow the viewer full access to the inner circles of the club .
Such access would be priceless .
@gnr4life said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346447) said:Why not just make a play for Bennett?
@hsvjones said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346488) said:@mike said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346467) said:@hsvjones said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346457) said:@mike said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346436) said:@voice_of_reason said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346396) said:@willow said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346365) said:There’s a feeling inside the club that the Tigers have a better and more balanced roster than they did in 2020, yet they are going backwards at a rate of knots. One of the questions set to be asked in the coming days is why perceived improvements in the roster aren’t being met with improvements in performance.
That's a fair enough assessment - most comments on here were the past off season has been our best in recent history for signings.
The question has to be asked why the performances aren't reflecting the improvement in roster.
**Madge has proven he can coach but it's looking less and less likely he's the right fit for us.**
I don't agree with the last sentence. Madge is trying to change the culture of the playing group. For way to long the players have had the say in running things and often to the overall detriment. Madge is trying to instil a winning culture. If Madge needs to break this playing group to achieve that cultural change then so be it. Those that don't buy in can leave. We have the break the cycle of letting the playing group get away with mediocrity, and then blaming the coach for their poor performance. The playing group need to be more professional in their approach and do what is needed to win.
Madge's hard nose approach is exactly what the club needs at this point in time. If it means we run last to do it then we run last. It's the cycle and culture that needs breaking and re-engineering.
If we change coaches now it might be a short term fix and we might achieve short term results but it won't fix the problem. We will remain a second tier team rather than a powerhouse.
Well said Mike and agree.. Unfortunately because it been like 10 years he will be gone and will make the jobs of others safe again ( same circle) ... The players need to be handed a realty check with the real world as what they dish up is a joke and all they want to do is offence not Defence. Fans and coaches would be happy to win 1-0 but our players want to win 46-44 and not put body on the line. Simple as that..
Then if he is gone it will be the same old same old. Nothing will ever change and no future coach would ever try again.
I want him to stay but how do we attract players here when this is what we put out? Something is not right as under Madge we were supposed to be one of the fittest teams (cause he is a so called hard task master) and be able to make these new rules changes suit us..
@gnr4life said in [Sack Madge](/post/1346444) said:Can you imagine if we do sack him. His replacement will have a rails run for years, cos “ThIs Is NoT hIs TeAm”