At some point the 'why' of it won't matter anymore- if it ever really did.
The 'fact' as far as I can see it is- the coach has the authority, granted by the board, to make this call. And he did. It's been happening in clubs since the salary cap was brought in. And only on very few occasions has a player made a huge issue of it.
This is one of those occasions.
I like Farah as a player- but I have to admit he hasn't been doing much to stem the flow of averageness in this club the last 3 years. He's been the 'key player' for this club during that time & if you look at it objectively, you'd have to say he hasn't proven to be 'worth' the kind of money he'll command on this contract.
The speculation to his role in removing coaches is just that- speculation. Without facts, it's all just theories.
But the board- who have taken over a club that has floundered for many years- have made a decision on a coach, Taylor- no matter if you like it or not. Clearly he had something to offer that they liked. It's very ignorant to just claim he was signed because he was 'cheapest'. You'd have to think his price tag would not have exceeded either Mick Potter's before him, or guys like Walters & Brown. He had previous 1st grade experience & had come from a strong club prior to us.
The club has made a choice, like nearly every other NRL club has made in the last 5-6 years, to let a player go. It happens ALL THE TIME. Just on this occasion, the player is acting very unprofessionally in response to it. That is on Farah.
Benji also acted very unprofessionally prior to his release.
Gibbs & Beau Ryan continue to be unprofessional.
Maybe it's time the Tigers took a big step away from that group of players that came through Tim Sheens' reign, who seem to have a certain amount of belief in their own entitlement, and try to forge a strong culture in the club?
The last remaining remanents of the 2005 group are just about out the door. And Farah is the last piece.
He's been a great player for the Tigers, and I don't doubt that he's a very loyal Tigers man. But for the better of the club, in the near future at least, the culture needs to change. And it simply won't happen when a man with the emotional influence over the younger players, like Farah reportedly does, who embodies the previous culture of the club, is still on the roster.
the Tigers might be poorer, short term, by losing Robbie Farah. But, if Taylor can get the young group of players left behind to buy into a more structured, professional attitude & set-up as a result, then it's a move that needs to be made.
Some valid points Chadmans Ghost seems to be the new approach to players that have served you well in more clubs than just ours. Just remember though with that comes the repercussions of players chasing the dollar/success with no loyalty whatsoever.. So the message has been sent to Tedesco, Moses, Woods, Brooks Tapau and whoever else generates an offer from another club - look after yourselves first. Terrible culture Robbie represented to the young players - committed, loyal, successful, intelligent, educated, oh yeah but he has got an ego and gets angry when he loses. The problem more likely that they respect him more than the coach likes.
I'm hearing you. :supporter: