Should we go with a new narrative?

@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402296) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402289) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402284) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402281) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

That they've been conditioned to accept failure on a large scale under Maguire.

For whatever reason, he cannot get the best from the players he has available. He's had significant input into the squad.

OMG, the players have been doing this for 10 years, Madge wasn't here when the rot set in, he is tasked with changing it, I thought that was understood?

That was his job for sure. But unfortunately for us **he ended up being more rotten than the players.**

What a terrible thing to say about anyone.

I didn't mean he's a rotten person, just like I don't think the players are rotten people. I think that his inability to coach and his inability to have any accountability in the playing group has amplified our issues. Imagine conceding 100pts in 2 weeks and making almost no changes.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

You don't normally win comps with a team of Neville's.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

What a unique situation a successful coach with great players.
 
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402303) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

You don't normally win comps with a team of Neville's.

Or can't perform as a coach without them.
 
@telltails said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402306) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

What a unique situation a successful coach with great players.

hhmmm.. same thing happened with Uncle Wayne right? but Newcastle was a flop... :laughing: Browny was so happy when he took over... not lol
 
@telltails said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402306) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

What a unique situation a successful coach with great players.

A bottom four coach, perhaps wooden spoon coach, without them.
 
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402303) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

You don't normally win comps with a team of Neville's.

Those players were still with Souths when they came 12th in 2016 and 2017.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402302) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402296) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402289) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402284) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402281) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

That they've been conditioned to accept failure on a large scale under Maguire.

For whatever reason, he cannot get the best from the players he has available. He's had significant input into the squad.

OMG, the players have been doing this for 10 years, Madge wasn't here when the rot set in, he is tasked with changing it, I thought that was understood?

That was his job for sure. But unfortunately for us **he ended up being more rotten than the players.**

What a terrible thing to say about anyone.

I didn't mean he's a rotten person, just like I don't think the players are rotten people. I think that his inability to coach and his inability to have any accountability in the playing group has amplified our issues. **Imagine conceding 100pts in 2 weeks** and making almost no changes.

Certainly hard to accept, but WHO have we got to replace them with?

I am so over Nofo with his performance of late, but without a decent replacement, what do you do. He is, a match winner when he decides to be one.

BTW, the Roosters just got flogged by the Storm by 46-0 and Parra are coming 3rd put 40 odd on us, we are NOT a good side yet, but we are not the worse and we are building imo.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402308) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402303) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

You don't normally win comps with a team of Neville's.

Or can't perform as a coach without them.

No coach performs without good players

@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402308) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402303) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

You don't normally win comps with a team of Neville's.

Or can't perform as a coach without them.

Of course they cant perform without them that is not unique either.
 
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402318) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402302) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402296) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402289) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402284) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402281) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

That they've been conditioned to accept failure on a large scale under Maguire.

For whatever reason, he cannot get the best from the players he has available. He's had significant input into the squad.

OMG, the players have been doing this for 10 years, Madge wasn't here when the rot set in, he is tasked with changing it, I thought that was understood?

That was his job for sure. But unfortunately for us **he ended up being more rotten than the players.**

What a terrible thing to say about anyone.

I didn't mean he's a rotten person, just like I don't think the players are rotten people. I think that his inability to coach and his inability to have any accountability in the playing group has amplified our issues. **Imagine conceding 100pts in 2 weeks** and making almost no changes.

Certainly hard to accept, but WHO have we got to replace them with?

I am so over Nofo with his performance of late, but without a decent replacement, what do you do. He is, a match winner when he decides to be one.

BTW, the Roosters just got flogged by the Storm by 46-0 and Parra are coming 3rd put 40 odd on us, we are NOT a good side yet, but we are not the worse and we are building imo.

Don’t get me started on Nofoaluma.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402312) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402303) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

You don't normally win comps with a team of Neville's.

Those players were still with Souths when they came 12th in 2016 and 2017.

I think (and happy to be corrected) there has only been one side (Roosters) who has gone back to back in the NRL, winning premierships.
 
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402318) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402302) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402296) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402289) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402284) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402281) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

That they've been conditioned to accept failure on a large scale under Maguire.

For whatever reason, he cannot get the best from the players he has available. He's had significant input into the squad.

OMG, the players have been doing this for 10 years, Madge wasn't here when the rot set in, he is tasked with changing it, I thought that was understood?

That was his job for sure. But unfortunately for us **he ended up being more rotten than the players.**

What a terrible thing to say about anyone.

I didn't mean he's a rotten person, just like I don't think the players are rotten people. I think that his inability to coach and his inability to have any accountability in the playing group has amplified our issues. **Imagine conceding 100pts in 2 weeks** and making almost no changes.

Certainly hard to accept, but WHO have we got to replace them with?

I am so over Nofo with his performance of late, but without a decent replacement, what do you do. He is, a match winner when he decides to be one.

BTW, the Roosters just got flogged by the Storm by 46-0 and Parra are coming 3rd put 40 odd on us, we are NOT a good side yet, but we are not the worse and we are building imo.

Nofo use to be one of our favourites.
Now it seems a lot of us are absolutely off him.

I wish Koro and Simona worked out better for us...

Imagine,

1 Laurie
2 Koroibete
3 Simona
4 Nofo
5 Maumamlo
 
@demps said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402322) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402318) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402302) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402296) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402289) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402284) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402281) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

That they've been conditioned to accept failure on a large scale under Maguire.

For whatever reason, he cannot get the best from the players he has available. He's had significant input into the squad.

OMG, the players have been doing this for 10 years, Madge wasn't here when the rot set in, he is tasked with changing it, I thought that was understood?

That was his job for sure. But unfortunately for us **he ended up being more rotten than the players.**

What a terrible thing to say about anyone.

I didn't mean he's a rotten person, just like I don't think the players are rotten people. I think that his inability to coach and his inability to have any accountability in the playing group has amplified our issues. **Imagine conceding 100pts in 2 weeks** and making almost no changes.

Certainly hard to accept, but WHO have we got to replace them with?

I am so over Nofo with his performance of late, but without a decent replacement, what do you do. He is, a match winner when he decides to be one.

BTW, the Roosters just got flogged by the Storm by 46-0 and Parra are coming 3rd put 40 odd on us, we are NOT a good side yet, but we are not the worse and we are building imo.

Nofo use to be one of our favourites.
Now it seems a lot of us are absolutely off him.

I wish Koro and Simona worked out better for us...

Imagine,

1 Laurie
2 Koroibete
3 Simona
4 Nofo
5 Maumamlo

I think Koro is still playing for the Wallabies?
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402320) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402318) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402302) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402296) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402289) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402284) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402281) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

That they've been conditioned to accept failure on a large scale under Maguire.

For whatever reason, he cannot get the best from the players he has available. He's had significant input into the squad.

OMG, the players have been doing this for 10 years, Madge wasn't here when the rot set in, he is tasked with changing it, I thought that was understood?

That was his job for sure. But unfortunately for us **he ended up being more rotten than the players.**

What a terrible thing to say about anyone.

I didn't mean he's a rotten person, just like I don't think the players are rotten people. I think that his inability to coach and his inability to have any accountability in the playing group has amplified our issues. **Imagine conceding 100pts in 2 weeks** and making almost no changes.

Certainly hard to accept, but WHO have we got to replace them with?

I am so over Nofo with his performance of late, but without a decent replacement, what do you do. He is, a match winner when he decides to be one.

BTW, the Roosters just got flogged by the Storm by 46-0 and Parra are coming 3rd put 40 odd on us, we are NOT a good side yet, but we are not the worse and we are building imo.

Don’t get me started on Nofoaluma.

4 more years ?
 
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402324) said:
@demps said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402322) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402318) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402302) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402296) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402289) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402284) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402281) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

That they've been conditioned to accept failure on a large scale under Maguire.

For whatever reason, he cannot get the best from the players he has available. He's had significant input into the squad.

OMG, the players have been doing this for 10 years, Madge wasn't here when the rot set in, he is tasked with changing it, I thought that was understood?

That was his job for sure. But unfortunately for us **he ended up being more rotten than the players.**

What a terrible thing to say about anyone.

I didn't mean he's a rotten person, just like I don't think the players are rotten people. I think that his inability to coach and his inability to have any accountability in the playing group has amplified our issues. **Imagine conceding 100pts in 2 weeks** and making almost no changes.

Certainly hard to accept, but WHO have we got to replace them with?

I am so over Nofo with his performance of late, but without a decent replacement, what do you do. He is, a match winner when he decides to be one.

BTW, the Roosters just got flogged by the Storm by 46-0 and Parra are coming 3rd put 40 odd on us, we are NOT a good side yet, but we are not the worse and we are building imo.

Nofo use to be one of our favourites.
Now it seems a lot of us are absolutely off him.

I wish Koro and Simona worked out better for us...

Imagine,

1 Laurie
2 Koroibete
3 Simona
4 Nofo
5 Maumamlo

I think Koro is still playing for the Wallabies?

Some one on here said he dissed the Tigers recently... dare say that door is closed.

Hoping for Allan Fitzgibbon to be the next Koroi/Addo Carr...

Guy seems to wanna be a tik tok star tho ?
 
@telltails said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402319) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402308) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402303) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

You don't normally win comps with a team of Neville's.

Or can't perform as a coach without them.

No coach performs without good players

@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402308) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402303) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

You don't normally win comps with a team of Neville's.

Or can't perform as a coach without them.

Of course they cant perform without them that is not unique either.

I mean really cannot perform.
 
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402321) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402312) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402303) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

You don't normally win comps with a team of Neville's.

Those players were still with Souths when they came 12th in 2016 and 2017.

I think (and happy to be corrected) there has only been one side (Roosters) who has gone back to back in the NRL, winning premierships.

To go from 1st to 12th with pretty much the same team in 2 years is not good
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402333) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402321) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402312) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402303) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

You don't normally win comps with a team of Neville's.

Those players were still with Souths when they came 12th in 2016 and 2017.

I think (and happy to be corrected) there has only been one side (Roosters) who has gone back to back in the NRL, winning premierships.

To go from 1st to 12th with pretty much the same team in 2 years is not good

No Keary, Cordner, Friend, B Morris...
Radley, Collins, Billy Smith, all side lined a lot of late.

They're cooked.
Depth isn't delivering.

Isn't it glorious.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402333) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402321) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402312) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402303) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402287) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402280) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402277) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402274) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402271) said:
@tigerwest said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402260) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Should we go with a new narrative?](/post/1402255) said:
He can’t coach

Hahaha, "He can’t coach", is that all you blokes have got? History tends to disagree with you.

A coach's tenure is determined by results, not history.

Once you realise what nearly everyone else knows, you will start to see the light.

Which is?

The guy can coach.
You choose not to look below him at the players, but that's your option.

Or, he had Inglis, Sam Burgess and Reynolds at Souths who were so good they made him better than he actually is?

You don't normally win comps with a team of Neville's.

Those players were still with Souths when they came 12th in 2016 and 2017.

I think (and happy to be corrected) there has only been one side (Roosters) who has gone back to back in the NRL, winning premierships.

To go from 1st to 12th with pretty much the same team in 2 years is not good

Didn't that happen to us after 2005?
 
Back
Top