I don't get how signing Idris is a risk.
If we offer him a minimum contract then how is that risky?
He may have had a history of injuries but every time you go out to play, you're at risk of injury. So signing Cameron Smith might be 'risky' because he may get injured.
If a minimum wage/depth player gets injured it is nothing to get fussed over. And if he does get injured, he can visit schools and community events to promote the Tigers.
If he doesn't get injured, we have a massive player ripping into the opposition.
I definitely think we should sign him
So , does this mean that Cameron Smith is a risky buy because of a long history
Of serious injuries.
Thanks for the laugh :laughing:
Mate, you know exactly what his point was.. Suggesting Idris is no risk on a minimum contract. If you dont agree post why not, otherwise leave the kid alone.
Didn't know he was a kid , but it was still a ridiculous comparison, ( to use a player who has hardly ever had long stints on the sidelands, to one who has Had more ham his share of problems with injuries and mind set) .
Idris is suspect no matter how much he is paid and we don't need to be tying up ANY money in that direction