Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Agree. I think I've seen Toa have about 1 good game and that when we pumped NQ by about 60 pts a few years ago. Other than that, I don't think he'd play 1st grade for anyone else. He can beat it with Twal. Both are ineffective in their positions. (Spare me Twals stats too, he's a work horse but that hasn't helped us win).

To'a has about 4 good games a season where he looks like a world beater.

The remaining 20 games he's either injured or doesn't look interested.

His defensive application is awful.
 
I'm not doubting the 1.8 million grant from HBG but you only use the dogs as a comparison - what about throwing in Warriors, Cronulla, Manly, and Canberra who are all in the bottom 6 clubs for commercial revenue yet 2 are in the Top4, 1 is in the 8 and 1 is just outside the 8. They seem to be doing ok on not much more than the tigers.
I chose Canterbury because they are right in the middle and they happen to be a geographic competitor. Makes more sense than comparing with say, the Broncos or Dolphins.

Since 2000, teams on the list from 1-6 have won 17/25 premierships. Parramatta are in that list and have won 0...so 5 clubs have won 17 of the 25 grand finals since 2000.

I'll exclude the Dolphins because they are new, but from the remaining 10 teams you have 8/25 premierships and Manly won 2 of them. The gap in success starts to look pretty dire when viewed over the long term.

I guess if your logic is to only look at the now, then you're right. 2 clubs are doing ok with little revenue. We also won something once...don't you want to do it more regularly?
 
This post had me thinking back to Kerry Packer’s classic senate estimates spray when he told the powers that be -

“I am not evading tax in any way, shape, or form. Now, of course I am minimising my tax, and if anybody in this country doesn't minimise their tax, they want the heads read. Because as a government, I can tell you you're not spending it that well that we should be donating extra.

HBG could well mount the same argument 👍
Then sell the joint to someone or a consortium who has half a clue about business and building success who actually sees the value in the club as something more than their personal plaything for them to get free gameday seating and drinks from. HBG are deadbeat owners. If they don't realise we're struggling because they're underfunding us they're complete morons.
 
This post had me thinking back to Kerry Packer’s classic senate estimates spray when he told the powers that be -

“I am not evading tax in any way, shape, or form. Now, of course I am minimising my tax, and if anybody in this country doesn't minimise their tax, they want the heads read. Because as a government, I can tell you you're not spending it that well that we should be donating extra.

HBG could well mount the same argument 👍
Yeah mate, well they certainly can't go much lower can they?

Maybe they want to break the record for the most amount of wooden spoons in a row?
 
Then sell the joint to someone or a consortium who has half a clue about business and building success who actually sees the value in the club as something more than their personal plaything for them to get free gameday seating and drinks from. HBG are deadbeat owners. If they don't realise we're struggling because they're underfunding us they're complete morons.
Do the sponsors meet that clown Burgess? If I was a sponsor I'd run if I knew he had anything to do with my sponsorship money.
 
Back
Top