@jirskyr said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1105311) said:@wokesmoke said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1105237) said:Crawly pulling numbers out his butt (no swearing coverup willow) again.
He also makes a lot of editorial commentary for a reporter.
"Tigers can ill-afford"
"Tigers are trying to sell it publicly"
"given some of the dud deals they have done in recent years"
The thing I intensely dislike about the idea of "dud deals" is many teams have done many done deals over the years, it's not restricted to Tigers.
And Tigers have a few blokes on the books who may have had an entirely different role / output had the coach stayed; i.e. it's the coach's movement that impacts many careers. This would be true of many clubs who move the coach on.
There are a few journos right now running the critical line that "Tigers need to sign someone before the season starts", whilst also acknowledging that the rush to sign players may have been a factor for the last coach.
Tigers don't actually have to do anything at all and I'm pleased that they aren't reacting to the media, that's one thing I like about Madge - you can write what you like, but Madge is his own man on his own schedule.
Finally - if you had said in October that our pre-season would be a swap BJ in and Esan out, I would have been cool with that. Latrell wasn't even on the radar at the time, and BJ is a much more cost-effective option in centres - you can sign BJ and another NRL-level player for Latrell's wage alone.
We're not the only club limited to dud deals.
Jack Bird, Anthony Milford, Darius Boyd, Ben Hunt and Corey Norman are just a few names off the top of my head that are on good coin and aren't returning on the reported investment.