twentyforty
Well-known member
@tiger-tragic said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1460501) said:@happy_tiger said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1460497) said:@balmain-boy said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1460480) said:@tiger_one said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1460441) said:If you commission a review, and you're part of what's being reviewed, good luck with objectivity.
But who else can commission the review, other than someone at the club?
Anyone externally really ......Matt Elliott .....Toovey .....Hagan
I agree with others that it needs to be a review led by people who know how to do reviews or formal evaluations such as; determining terms of reference, scope of participants (staff, players, members, fans, corporate sponsors, board members ....?), data collection, triangulation and analytical methods, drafting of recommendatiosn aligned to data/evidence gathered etc.
Any number of people could do it and I don't think it needs to be anyone from an NRL background. But I do think a key compoenent of it should be how the soon-to-be functioning CoE will be integrated into systems improvement at the club.
Absolutely! The idea of an ex player or ex coach who isn't qualified and highly skilled to do a comprehensive review brings limitations to the scope. If they are genuine in their intentions to have a "full scale review" then the entire organisation should be open to the review. Any position which communicates or has influence on the playing group. Which obviously includes the chair, given the recent signing of Nofa.
My suspicion is we've had these types of reviews before, done in house, with the result known before the start. Sack the coach. This has a short term easing of the pressure on those who are really responsible for our mediocrity, and so it goes..