Who should Madge's assistant coaches be for 2022?

[cochise]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

 

[cochise]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

 

[cochise]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served. Importantly, if you are aware this is going to happen again write now to the NRL.

 

[cochise]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served.

That wasn't what you said though. I stated that you don't put players health at risk to win footy games, you disagreed.

He is available for consideration, doesn't make it right to appoint him.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served.

That wasn't what you said though. I stated that you don't put players health at risk to win footy games, you disagreed.

He is available for consideration, doesn't make it right to appoint him.

You can write to the NRL detailing your concerns. I have no evidence this will ever happen again. What I do know is that he has been punished and served that punishment. Do you expect him to be punished more than once for what he allegedly did?

 

[Telltails]

Whether you back Maguire or not the club has - and if they want any level of success whoever makes the decision about who to appoint they have to consider how that person will work with Maguire and make sure that both are on board and clear about their roles.
If they want to tie up Flannagan sack Maguire now and give him the job. He has no desire to be an assistant coach he knows it and so does Maguire.

 

[cochise]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served.

That wasn't what you said though. I stated that you don't put players health at risk to win footy games, you disagreed.

He is available for consideration, doesn't make it right to appoint him.

You can write to the NRL detailing your concerns. I have no evidence this will ever happen again. What I do know is that he has been punished and served that punishment. Do you expect him to be punished more than once for what he allegedly did?

Allegedly did? He was suspended for his behaviour, no need to use the word allegedly unless trying to downplay it. Why wouldn't he do it again? He has shown he believes he is above the consequences of his behaviour before, he has shown no evidence he wouldn't go straight back to this behaviour. Just because someone has been punished does not mean that there are no more consequences for their behaviour. We should not have him anywhere near the club.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served.

That wasn't what you said though. I stated that you don't put players health at risk to win footy games, you disagreed.

He is available for consideration, doesn't make it right to appoint him.

You can write to the NRL detailing your concerns. I have no evidence this will ever happen again. What I do know is that he has been punished and served that punishment. Do you expect him to be punished more than once for what he allegedly did?

Allegedly did? He was suspended for his behaviour, no need to use the word allegedly unless trying to downplay it. Why wouldn't he do it again? He has shown he believes he is above the consequences of his behaviour before, he has shown no evidence he wouldn't go straight back to this behaviour. Just because someone has been punished does not mean that there are no more consequences for their behaviour. We should not have him anywhere near the club.

If you have evidence that he has or is intending to do it again, report it to the NRL.

You have made your opinion known. I am willing to give him the chance.

If you want individuals to be punished twice for the same breach, join the ADF.

 

[twentyforty]

Whether you back Maguire or not the club has - and if they want any level of success whoever makes the decision about who to appoint they have to consider how that person will work with Maguire and make sure that both are on board and clear about their roles.
If they want to tie up Flannagan sack Maguire now and give him the job. He has no desire to be an assistant coach he knows it and so does Maguire.

Further, a new assistant coach should report to and be hired by the head coach. Lee said the board want to have more say in who is hired. Oddly, I think that statement has now been redacted from the WT site video?
With all due respect the board members obviously have something to offer from their professional and variety skill sets, because many have lasted 10 to 20 years, but their collective decision making has been questionable when it comes to football. The problem is, they obviously don’t realise this? As Lee stated nothing they do has any bearing on on-field performance. At the same time, they want even more influence? Isn’t this the argument Sheens lost a decade ago?

 

[cochise]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served.

That wasn't what you said though. I stated that you don't put players health at risk to win footy games, you disagreed.

He is available for consideration, doesn't make it right to appoint him.

You can write to the NRL detailing your concerns. I have no evidence this will ever happen again. What I do know is that he has been punished and served that punishment. Do you expect him to be punished more than once for what he allegedly did?

Allegedly did? He was suspended for his behaviour, no need to use the word allegedly unless trying to downplay it. Why wouldn't he do it again? He has shown he believes he is above the consequences of his behaviour before, he has shown no evidence he wouldn't go straight back to this behaviour. Just because someone has been punished does not mean that there are no more consequences for their behaviour. We should not have him anywhere near the club.

If you have evidence that he has or is intending to do it again, report it to the NRL.

You have made your opinion known. I am willing to give him the chance.

If you want individuals to be punished twice for the same breach, join the ADF.

You have made your opinion known as well, why wouldn't I counter when you push for Flanno? I don't need evidence, he refused to follow consequences in the past, the risk just isn't worth it.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served.

That wasn't what you said though. I stated that you don't put players health at risk to win footy games, you disagreed.

He is available for consideration, doesn't make it right to appoint him.

You can write to the NRL detailing your concerns. I have no evidence this will ever happen again. What I do know is that he has been punished and served that punishment. Do you expect him to be punished more than once for what he allegedly did?

Allegedly did? He was suspended for his behaviour, no need to use the word allegedly unless trying to downplay it. Why wouldn't he do it again? He has shown he believes he is above the consequences of his behaviour before, he has shown no evidence he wouldn't go straight back to this behaviour. Just because someone has been punished does not mean that there are no more consequences for their behaviour. We should not have him anywhere near the club.

If you have evidence that he has or is intending to do it again, report it to the NRL.

You have made your opinion known. I am willing to give him the chance.

If you want individuals to be punished twice for the same breach, join the ADF.

You have made your opinion known as well, why wouldn't I counter when you push for Flanno? I don't need evidence, he refused to follow consequences in the past, the risk just isn't worth it.

Coutts-Trotter was gaoled for his crime and will now be head of the NSW Premier's Dept. A great story of redemption.

I am quite happy to give Flanagan the chance. If he comes then as I have stated once or twice, you have a decision to make.

 

[cochise]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served.

That wasn't what you said though. I stated that you don't put players health at risk to win footy games, you disagreed.

He is available for consideration, doesn't make it right to appoint him.

You can write to the NRL detailing your concerns. I have no evidence this will ever happen again. What I do know is that he has been punished and served that punishment. Do you expect him to be punished more than once for what he allegedly did?

Allegedly did? He was suspended for his behaviour, no need to use the word allegedly unless trying to downplay it. Why wouldn't he do it again? He has shown he believes he is above the consequences of his behaviour before, he has shown no evidence he wouldn't go straight back to this behaviour. Just because someone has been punished does not mean that there are no more consequences for their behaviour. We should not have him anywhere near the club.

If you have evidence that he has or is intending to do it again, report it to the NRL.

You have made your opinion known. I am willing to give him the chance.

If you want individuals to be punished twice for the same breach, join the ADF.

You have made your opinion known as well, why wouldn't I counter when you push for Flanno? I don't need evidence, he refused to follow consequences in the past, the risk just isn't worth it.

Coutts-Trotter was gaoled for his crime and will now be head of the NSW Premier's Dept. A great story of redemption.

I am quite happy to give Flanagan the chance. If he comes then as I have stated once or twice, you have a decision to make.

Why would I have a decision to make? I am not happy to give Flanagan responsibility over young people.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served.

That wasn't what you said though. I stated that you don't put players health at risk to win footy games, you disagreed.

He is available for consideration, doesn't make it right to appoint him.

You can write to the NRL detailing your concerns. I have no evidence this will ever happen again. What I do know is that he has been punished and served that punishment. Do you expect him to be punished more than once for what he allegedly did?

Allegedly did? He was suspended for his behaviour, no need to use the word allegedly unless trying to downplay it. Why wouldn't he do it again? He has shown he believes he is above the consequences of his behaviour before, he has shown no evidence he wouldn't go straight back to this behaviour. Just because someone has been punished does not mean that there are no more consequences for their behaviour. We should not have him anywhere near the club.

If you have evidence that he has or is intending to do it again, report it to the NRL.

You have made your opinion known. I am willing to give him the chance.

If you want individuals to be punished twice for the same breach, join the ADF.

You have made your opinion known as well, why wouldn't I counter when you push for Flanno? I don't need evidence, he refused to follow consequences in the past, the risk just isn't worth it.

Coutts-Trotter was gaoled for his crime and will now be head of the NSW Premier's Dept. A great story of redemption.

I am quite happy to give Flanagan the chance. If he comes then as I have stated once or twice, you have a decision to make.

Why would I have a decision to make? I am not happy to give Flanagan responsibility over young people.

Well, if the club is happy to appoint him in some capacity and you feel strongly about it, clearly you have a decision to make.

 

[Jedi_Tiger]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served. Importantly, if you are aware this is going to happen again write now to the NRL.

He has served his time

 

[cochise]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served.

That wasn't what you said though. I stated that you don't put players health at risk to win footy games, you disagreed.

He is available for consideration, doesn't make it right to appoint him.

You can write to the NRL detailing your concerns. I have no evidence this will ever happen again. What I do know is that he has been punished and served that punishment. Do you expect him to be punished more than once for what he allegedly did?

Allegedly did? He was suspended for his behaviour, no need to use the word allegedly unless trying to downplay it. Why wouldn't he do it again? He has shown he believes he is above the consequences of his behaviour before, he has shown no evidence he wouldn't go straight back to this behaviour. Just because someone has been punished does not mean that there are no more consequences for their behaviour. We should not have him anywhere near the club.

If you have evidence that he has or is intending to do it again, report it to the NRL.

You have made your opinion known. I am willing to give him the chance.

If you want individuals to be punished twice for the same breach, join the ADF.

You have made your opinion known as well, why wouldn't I counter when you push for Flanno? I don't need evidence, he refused to follow consequences in the past, the risk just isn't worth it.

Coutts-Trotter was gaoled for his crime and will now be head of the NSW Premier's Dept. A great story of redemption.

I am quite happy to give Flanagan the chance. If he comes then as I have stated once or twice, you have a decision to make.

Why would I have a decision to make? I am not happy to give Flanagan responsibility over young people.

Well, if the club is happy to appoint him in some capacity and you feel strongly about it, clearly you have a decision to make.

What decision?

 

[cochise]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served. Importantly, if you are aware this is going to happen again write now to the NRL.

He has served his time

Still not worth the risk

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Please bring in Flanagan. Yes he has been a villain in the past but he knows a footballer, is a great man manager and can slide into the top job without the fuss the WTs' attracts.

You don't risk the health of our players to win football games.

That's your opinion but it is not shared by me nor others. If he does come you have a decision to make.

So you are happy to put our players health at risk to win footy games, good to know.

The NRL are satisfied he has been punished, served that punishment and is again available to participate. End of matter.

But as you said, you are happy to risk players health to win footy games.

Flanagan is available for consideration to be assistant or coach according to the NRL. His punishment has been served.

That wasn't what you said though. I stated that you don't put players health at risk to win footy games, you disagreed.

He is available for consideration, doesn't make it right to appoint him.

You can write to the NRL detailing your concerns. I have no evidence this will ever happen again. What I do know is that he has been punished and served that punishment. Do you expect him to be punished more than once for what he allegedly did?

Allegedly did? He was suspended for his behaviour, no need to use the word allegedly unless trying to downplay it. Why wouldn't he do it again? He has shown he believes he is above the consequences of his behaviour before, he has shown no evidence he wouldn't go straight back to this behaviour. Just because someone has been punished does not mean that there are no more consequences for their behaviour. We should not have him anywhere near the club.

If you have evidence that he has or is intending to do it again, report it to the NRL.

You have made your opinion known. I am willing to give him the chance.

If you want individuals to be punished twice for the same breach, join the ADF.

You have made your opinion known as well, why wouldn't I counter when you push for Flanno? I don't need evidence, he refused to follow consequences in the past, the risk just isn't worth it.

Coutts-Trotter was gaoled for his crime and will now be head of the NSW Premier's Dept. A great story of redemption.

I am quite happy to give Flanagan the chance. If he comes then as I have stated once or twice, you have a decision to make.

Why would I have a decision to make? I am not happy to give Flanagan responsibility over young people.

Well, if the club is happy to appoint him in some capacity and you feel strongly about it, clearly you have a decision to make.

What decision?

To not support the WTs if you feel so strongly about him if he is appointed by WTs in a capacity.