Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Harvey said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090793) said:What do you do when he doesn't put in for the year that he is here? Refuses to put body on the line etc. and becomes a weakness @ $1m a year?
@new-smoking-gun said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090768) said:@Russell said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090766) said:One year deal - not on your Nellie for mine.
That is just being used to the fullest extent - used to help those mongrels in the Cardinal and Myrtle.
Imagine a sports star using a team. Unheard of. Tigers have about 1.6mil to spend for 2020. Spend it. 2020 with trel at fullback is better than 2020 with Mbye at fullback. Worry about the rest later.
@new-smoking-gun said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090808) said:@Moh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090802) said:'New' smoking gun losing credibility real quick with that idea.
I have no inside sources, but let me tell you now - LM at the TIgers for one year will not happen. Scoooooooooooop.
Think what you want. It’s a legitimate option for LM.
@Cairnstigers said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090815) said:@new-smoking-gun said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090768) said:@Russell said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090766) said:One year deal - not on your Nellie for mine.
That is just being used to the fullest extent - used to help those mongrels in the Cardinal and Myrtle.
Imagine a sports star using a team. Unheard of. Tigers have about 1.6mil to spend for 2020. Spend it. 2020 with trel at fullback is better than 2020 with Mbye at fullback. Worry about the rest later.
Yeah sounds great
Tigers can be known as the Club to join when you want a **Gap** year
Not the way to go IMO
if Latrell wants a year with us for a Million bucks then he needs to at least sign on for a second year for another Million
We should not allow our club to be used like this
It would be a disaster as it would set a bad precedent for future signings
We should be showing the league community we are not desperate
By agreeing to a one year term it without a doubt shows how desperate we are
Lets not embarras ourselves and walk away if that's all he is after
Now "New smoking gun" are you sure you are the original smoking gun
Because I held you in high regard before this post
I can't believe you would sell our club short and think this would be good for us because that's what it sounds like you are saying
I would rather sign 3 or 4 other non contracted 1st grade players on a 1 year deal who are still looking for a contract and are hungry
Lets face it these players would need to perform for a future contract and would try their guts out
Latrell would see his year with us as a holiday as he would no doubt have another club lined up after his 1 year with us
So IMO it's 2 years minimum or CC for Latrell
Take it or leave it
@new-smoking-gun said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090818) said:@Cairnstigers said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090815) said:@new-smoking-gun said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090768) said:@Russell said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090766) said:One year deal - not on your Nellie for mine.
That is just being used to the fullest extent - used to help those mongrels in the Cardinal and Myrtle.
Imagine a sports star using a team. Unheard of. Tigers have about 1.6mil to spend for 2020. Spend it. 2020 with trel at fullback is better than 2020 with Mbye at fullback. Worry about the rest later.
Yeah sounds great
Tigers can be known as the Club to join when you want a **Gap** year
Not the way to go IMO
if Latrell wants a year with us for a Million bucks then he needs to at least sign on for a second year for another Million
We should not allow our club to be used like this
It would be a disaster as it would set a bad precedent for future signings
We should be showing the league community we are not desperate
By agreeing to a one year term it without a doubt shows how desperate we are
Lets not embarras ourselves and walk away if that's all he is after
Now "New smoking gun" are you sure you are the original smoking gun
Because I held you in high regard before this post
I can't believe you would sell our club short and think this would be good for us because that's what it sounds like you are saying
I would rather sign 3 or 4 other non contracted 1st grade players on a 1 year deal who are still looking for a contract and are hungry
Lets face it these players would need to perform for a future contract and would try their guts out
Latrell would see his year with us as a holiday as he would no doubt have another club lined up after his 1 year with us
So IMO it's 2 years minimum or CC for Latrell
Take it or leave it
Do I think a one year deal will happen? No. BUT, it’s not unrealistic. I think the 4 year deal will happen ultimately once buy out agreements are met. Doesn’t mean he will see it out. Then you will all be whinging about that as well.
@new-smoking-gun said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090791) said:@Nelson said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090785) said:@new-smoking-gun said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090768) said:@Russell said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090766) said:One year deal - not on your Nellie for mine.
That is just being used to the fullest extent - used to help those mongrels in the Cardinal and Myrtle.
Imagine a sports star using a team. Unheard of. Tigers have about 1.6mil to spend for 2020. Spend it. 2020 with trel at fullback is better than 2020 with Mbye at fullback. Worry about the rest later.
Imagine a team being dumb enough to allow a sports star to flagrantly use them and turn them into a laughing stock halfway house.
Would you sign him if it meant tigers became a legit contender? Even if only one season? Or stick with mbye and miss finals again for the next 2 years. It’s a win win for both club and player. It’s unlikely it would be a 1 year deal but to think it’s not beneficial for the club AND player is stupid
@Ponyo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090790) said:You guys have managed to get yourselves bent out of shape for 2 pages over what the fake smoking gun said about 1 year contract.
I want to know more what he thinks he knows about Reynolds..that was a bold statement
@Needaname said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090707) said:@Newtown said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090700) said:Can't wait for the Pascoe Q and A this week. Will be extremely interesting.
Is anyone willing to ask the tough question?
Why are the WestsTigers the least desirable location in the league for marquee recruits?
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090832) said:We've signed Farah and Marshall for 1 year deals before so we've got form in this area. I wouldnt put it past us.
@Tiger-Tarl said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090835) said:I have it on good authority that LM will sign with us this week!
Stand by 😉
@Tiger-Tarl said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090835) said:I have it on good authority that LM will sign with us this week!
Stand by 😉
@Tiger-Tarl said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090835) said:I have it on good authority that LM will sign with us this week!
Stand by 😉