@jirskyr said in [Roosters pull Mitchell’s contract offer](/post/1076775) said:
Shows what loyalty and contracts means nowadays. If you want more money, sniff around, cause friction and good chance of being released.
I wonder who will be the first club to try and dock money from under-performing players?
Normally I agree with this type of view but I think it's a bit different in this case
Seems Latrell was signed to end 2018 but was extended before season 2018 out to 2020 and they upped it to $450k for 2019 & 2020, not sure what they did about the 2018 season
He's now had 4 years in 1st grade and made SOO and Australia honours since his extension and won two comps, so no doubt he's worth a lot more
I think it's reasonable to expect the Roosters would do something about upgrading and to be fair they have they have, offering $800k a season for 2021 & 2022 (2020?), two seasons after his last contract was signed, so maybe a touch late given his progression since then. At $450k a season for a Rep player and a big difference maker in their team of stars, it's way unders and to me that's why it has come to this
He deserves more, they offered more, so fair play to the Roosters, but he believes he can do better. His looking elsewhere was in response to an offer he found to be short of the mark. That's a different situation to the Matterson saga and I can't begrudge him doing the best he can for himself