@The_Patriot said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081691) said:
Roosters know he wants to have a look at Souths. Imo they are saying sign with tigers or you play reserves.
Pretty slack of them to do that I reckon. If they really don’t want him at the club anymore then he should be able to go and play where he wants to play, not force him to sign somewhere else. It doesn’t help anyone.
Disagree.
Would have loved loved loved our club to dig and refuse to release Matterson to the Eels. it was obvious that was his intention.
I applaud the Roosters if true. Could only wish our club was run as stubbornly.
Yeah I see your point, it’s very much up for debate I suppose. I’m of the opinion that hanging onto to someone who doesn’t want to be here is just cause for friction and disharmony within the team, which could ultimately derail the whole season. As much as I would’ve liked to have kept Matterson, I think the club made the right decision to release him as his position here and relationship with the rest of the team was completely destroyed because of his behaviour.
I’d much rather have a unified team, who want to play for the club and for each other rather than a team carrying a disgruntled player who could create all sorts of drama. I don’t think the club wanted another situation like that of Moses, so they let Matterson walk so they could move forward.