@GNR4LIFE said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1087968) said:
If this is true, we have to up the ante and bump our offer. Offer him 1.3 if that’s what it takes. I know it’s overs, it’s obvious that’s what it will take to get him here. We’re having no luck, so desperate times call for desperate measures.
Trouble is what we have offered him and then withdrawn was way overs in my opinion. Now people are talking about another 300,000 per year.
How far above overs do you go?
Yes, yes, as far as it takes to get him...... No! the offer we tabled is too much.
850k per year would be my offer. I don't think he is a million dollar player....Yet!
‘Yet’ that’s the key word, why not get him on board now?
It is a risk, but the positives out weigh the negatives in my opinion, sadly, we are used to dud signings already, if it goes bad we can handle it.
You mean have a waste of 1 mill for another three years. Not worth the money - too big a risk. I know we are desperate but......
I don’t think it will be a waste, we have the cash that we have to spend, we need what he can potentially offer.
It’s a risk, but Not a waste.
We’ve signed a lot players at an ‘Overs Rate’.
Latrell is 22, he will only get better over the next few years.
What if he decides that he doesn't like it at the WT's as some of the other players have done and wants to break his contract (hopefully WT's have learned by their mistakes and put a clause in which will not allow him to do that ) I'm sick of these players that want out as soon as they get sick of it for whatever reason.
But of course we don't know that he is going to sign with us- I'll be surprised if he does:angry: