Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
@JD-Tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088811) said:
Disagree. It is not Souths that want out of the deal? Really? I’m sure they’d love to put his total money on their cap the next few years.

I am sure they would much prefer to have Burgess playing! He has retired!



@JD-Tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088811) said:
I would think it’s a good bet that WT didn’t announce Ben’s retirement as they were trying not to invoke the ire of the NRL again, saying nothing until they were sure what was going on.

Of course they could have announced his retirement and then sought removing his salary after the fact. There are no rules preventing a player from retiring from the game so what ire would they have invoked? It appears that Ben's retirement was conditional on him being paid his salary and it being removed from the cap.
 
@BernieLomax said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088814) said:
@the_third said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088577) said:
Roosters have already spent his salary.

They can’t spend his salary, he has a contract!

His contract for next year is $400k, his offer is $800k so it is possible they have spent the extra money in his offer.
 
The current posts in this thread about Burgess and Mitchell are very confusing. One common denominator however is that we as NRL supporters are unable to do anything abut their situation regardless of how many posts we put out in this forum.
 
@BernieLomax said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088814) said:
@the_third said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088577) said:
Roosters have already spent his salary.

They can’t spend his salary, he has a contract!

Lol. Like that matters for the Rorters...
 
@TheDaBoss said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1087715) said:
@Sart0ri said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1087714) said:
Tedesco is a fantastic player but has strengths and weaknesses like everyone else

There is no one in the NRL who is 100% perfect

WoW!!! you musta tort about dat one for a while @TheDaBoss, to come up with such a perfect statement
 
@AnnandaleTiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088897) said:
The greatest disappointment would be him signing on to stay at the roosters. I’d even prefer he signed with bunnies.

The greatest disappointment would be if he chose the Titans imo. Signing with Souths/staying with Roosters over us would be understandable. But the Titans would be a real kick in the teeth.
 
@cktiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088857) said:
Does anybody seriously think Burgess will still be doing this supposed job 10 years from now?

Just an out of sight out of mind tax arrangement only way they could pay him out.Plenty of room for manipulation over 10 years. Divorce settlement hanging over him as well.
 
@Don_Kershane said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088900) said:
@cktiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088857) said:
Does anybody seriously think Burgess will still be doing this supposed job 10 years from now?

Just an out of sight out of mind tax arrangement only way they could pay him out.Plenty of room for manipulation over 10 years. Divorce settlement hanging over him as well.

Not to mention The Bar Tab from the Rehab Session on the yacht.
 
@WT2K said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088865) said:
He'll be meeting with Politis in the next few days (DT)

Without a doubt he'll be staying with the Rorters .. yes he is stil under contract with Chooks at around $400K per season .. LM wanted an upgrade to his contract, Chooks offered $800K per season .. but LM turned it down .. so if he goes back to the Chooks he will be on the is so call $400K .. but having a meeting this week with Politis will more than likely mean that LM will be receiving a lot more in his brown paper bag from now on.

Why else would you knock back our offer of $1M per season .. and stay on $400K .. especially since he said .. "I have look after and do the right thing for my family from now on" .. ;-)
 
@TigerSkins said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088910) said:
@WT2K said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1088865) said:
He'll be meeting with Politis in the next few days (DT)

Without a doubt he'll be staying with the Rorters .. yes he is stil under contract with Chooks at around $400K per season .. LM wanted an upgrade to his contract, Chooks offered $800K per season .. but LM turned it down .. so if he goes back to the Chooks he will be on the is so call $400K .. but having a meeting this week with Politis will more than likely mean that LM will be receiving a lot more in his brown paper bag from now on.

Why else would you knock back our offer of $1M per season .. and stay on $400K .. especially since he said .. "I have look after and do the right thing for my family from now on" .. ;-)

why would he want to miss out on West Sydneys Exquiste houses and views :grin: :relieved:
 
Ok ..stay calm everyone

We set up a 24 hour rotating roster that follows Madge , Lee and Lenny Jr

Team Omega follows Lee

Team Alpha follows Madge

Team Delta follows Lenny Jr

Report back on any strange anomalies please
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top