@twentyforty said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1442342) said:@lauren said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1442317) said:@twentyforty said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1442145) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1442135) said:@twentyforty said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1442131) said:@trusted_insider said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1442124) said:@twentyforty said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1442097) said:I think if we looked hard enough we would find a few leaders in the 17.
That's counter-intuitive though isn't it?
If there are leaders in the squad they would've demonstrated it by now without having to go searching for them.
Have only really seen hints of it from AD and Luciano.
I remain completely baffled by the appointment of Tamou as captain, regardless of the minutes he plays (all 27 of them).
It’s more counter intuitive to create the expectation in the minds of the players that there are no leaders.
At this stage with the exception of AD there is no-one who exhibits leadership in the team. Tamou has been an absolute bust of a signing.
That’s the question isn’t it..how does Madge create 17 leaders from the team he has?
He could start by listing the qualities of a leader and rewarding those players who display them. Contrary to popular opinion, leaders aren’t born, they are a product of desire and circumstance.
There's a reason why a couple of players have emerged as genuine leaders and IMO it's also why they're our most consistent or better players.
Doueihi and Luciano - like Laurie and Stefano - have come to the club from the more successful or competitive environments, in which they've had to fight for their spot/position in those teams.
Their commitment and determination levels are probably the polar opposite to anyone from our systems no offence. They've always had to increase their effort and standards just to get that experience of playing first grade footy.
It's why I agree with others that if we miss out on marquee signings, we should target players in a similar situation as to what the players I've listed were in.
Absolutely, couldn’t agree more. In a poorly managed club which continually has more losses than wins, finding it hard to attract players, the average player gets a rank and file leg up from reserves and you would think they’ve just climbed Everest. It’s no longer enough to recognise talent alone, we need to look for that hunger which can’t be satisfied by small successes along the way. We know the recruitment team is on track when you look at the players you mention and the situation they came from. There’s a heap of opportunity at WT which will gradually close as each season passes. If I’m a player warming a bench at another club, the best thing I can do is back myself and grab a short term contract at WT.
Can see what Ivan was trying to instil in the team - with the whole Nofo and Thompson competing for a wing spot, during the start of his tenure - and it actually helped encourage them to own their own roles or responsibilities, if you ask me.
Players were willing to step up.
I didn't want Finucane for what he was demanding but he would've been an absolute asset to driving higher standards and if we can land (recruit) someone similar, I feel it will be a good start.