Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@garryowen said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465681) said:Further - what's the over/under on media appearances from Lee H this week? I'll set the line at 25.
@geo said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465659) said:I won't say the buck passing in our Club never ceases to amaze me because quite frankly it doesn't..
None of them have mirrors....it's always someone else's fault...nothing will change only the names to protect the guilty...
As a fan all you can do is hope...the thing rebellions are built on...
Instead of back stabbing, back slapping and finger pointing..pull you bloody fingers out and do something for crying out loud..
@thedaboss said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465687) said:Madge- really nice bloke...great media man
Can't coach in this new game tho
@tilllindemann said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465652) said:@aturkey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465644) said:Madge has only had success in the NRL with a team that had Greg Inglis (in his peak), Luke Keary and Adam Reynolds as halves (Legit perfect halves pairing), Sam Burgess (in his peak) and two hookers of Isaac Luke (in his peak) and a handy replacement in Api Korisau.
If we're not going to count premierships that have good players in the team, we're not going to be counting many premierships at all. Clubs like the Roosters have fielded teams where every.single.player is a representative.
@kiwitiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465653) said:@harvey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465645) said:Pascoe and Hartigan conducting the review. Obviously it is not their fault & so Madge will be moved on.
Your joking about those 2 conducting the review right?
@aturkey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465696) said:@tilllindemann said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465652) said:@aturkey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465644) said:Madge has only had success in the NRL with a team that had Greg Inglis (in his peak), Luke Keary and Adam Reynolds as halves (Legit perfect halves pairing), Sam Burgess (in his peak) and two hookers of Isaac Luke (in his peak) and a handy replacement in Api Korisau.
If we're not going to count premierships that have good players in the team, we're not going to be counting many premierships at all. Clubs like the Roosters have fielded teams where every.single.player is a representative.
I understand it's an achievement but I really don't think it's as relevant as everyone is making it out to be. People seem to put Madge in a tier above others because of that prem, which is ludicrous to me considering the talent. He's about the same as Paul Green. He has shown NOTHING since that premiership.
Answer me this: why do people think he's a good coach? (Without mentioning 2014)
@harvey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465697) said:@kiwitiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465653) said:@harvey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465645) said:Pascoe and Hartigan conducting the review. Obviously it is not their fault & so Madge will be moved on.
Your joking about those 2 conducting the review right?
https://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/dead-coach-walking-ugly-rift-shows-its-over/news-story/3d5a0073dd03a1eada91851935631dd4?from=rss-flipboard
The Tigers are about to commence a post-season review led by CEO Justin Pascoe and head of football Adam Hartigan and Sunday’s humiliating loss certainly doesn’t put Maguire in good stead.
@thedaboss said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465700) said:@aturkey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465696) said:@tilllindemann said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465652) said:@aturkey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465644) said:Madge has only had success in the NRL with a team that had Greg Inglis (in his peak), Luke Keary and Adam Reynolds as halves (Legit perfect halves pairing), Sam Burgess (in his peak) and two hookers of Isaac Luke (in his peak) and a handy replacement in Api Korisau.
If we're not going to count premierships that have good players in the team, we're not going to be counting many premierships at all. Clubs like the Roosters have fielded teams where every.single.player is a representative.
I understand it's an achievement but I really don't think it's as relevant as everyone is making it out to be. People seem to put Madge in a tier above others because of that prem, which is ludicrous to me considering the talent. He's about the same as Paul Green. He has shown NOTHING since that premiership.
Answer me this: why do people think he's a good coach? (Without mentioning 2014)
I think he is a good coach....prior to thr game becoming modern..e.g. becoming faster
Its moved away from his ideal style of footy in 2014
Thats my take on it anyway
@aturkey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465696) said:@tilllindemann said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465652) said:@aturkey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465644) said:Madge has only had success in the NRL with a team that had Greg Inglis (in his peak), Luke Keary and Adam Reynolds as halves (Legit perfect halves pairing), Sam Burgess (in his peak) and two hookers of Isaac Luke (in his peak) and a handy replacement in Api Korisau.
If we're not going to count premierships that have good players in the team, we're not going to be counting many premierships at all. Clubs like the Roosters have fielded teams where every.single.player is a representative.
I understand it's an achievement but I really don't think it's as relevant as everyone is making it out to be. People seem to put Madge in a tier above others because of that prem, which is ludicrous to me considering the talent. He's about the same as Paul Green.
@lauren said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465694) said:@geo said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465659) said:I won't say the buck passing in our Club never ceases to amaze me because quite frankly it doesn't..
None of them have mirrors....it's always someone else's fault...nothing will change only the names to protect the guilty...
As a fan all you can do is hope...the thing rebellions are built on...
Instead of back stabbing, back slapping and finger pointing..pull you bloody fingers out and do something for crying out loud..
This is what does me about the club, that set-up-to-fail syndrome is and has been present for a while and it will continue to leave us in a tailspin until they all recognise their own failures.
Bennett knew he was being moved on but he was angling for the payout. No way he was ever going to quit.@needaname said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465663) said:@jirskyr said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465336) said:@needaname said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1464979) said:Imagine a struggling club giving the SuperCoach a 10 day deadline to decide if he is going to leave his current club a year early.
Should of, from day one agreed to move on from Cleary internally, agreed with Bennett to start in 2020 and figured out the rest afterwards.
That's not the narrative though. There wasn't a guarantee Bennett would ever leave Brisbane, because it was a tug of war between him and certain senior elements on the Broncos Board.
Bennett said, now in writing, he was open to taking the Tigers position but couldn't honourably leave his Broncos side a year early (also contractually he's not permitted to). Now maybe Bennett is some mad loyalist or maybe he was forcing the Broncos' hand for a super-duper payout for his troubles, but whatever the reason he was hanging around until at least the end of his contract, and if he could outstay or out-result the naysayers within the Broncos, there's also a chance he re-signs with Broncos. Wayne Bennett is not a political mug, he's been at it for a very long time.
So I don't see anywhere suggested that Bennett was willing to sign on for 2020 with Tigers without knowing his exact future at Broncos. That was never the offer and I've never heard it said that Bennett was willing to come a year later. Bennett has only ever said "I can't leave the Broncos right now". And then, months later, Bennett gets the chop.
Well you can read between the lines. When someone says I want to coach you but I still have a year left with Brisbane and I’m not going to leave them without finishing the job does give an indication that he was ready to move on.
@geo said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465670) said:@jrtiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465661) said:@geo said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465659) said:I won't say the buck passing in our Club never ceases to amaze me because quite frankly it doesn't..
None of them have mirrors....it's always someone else's fault...nothing will change only the names to protect the guilty...
As a fan all you can do is hope...the thing rebellions are built on...
Instead of back stabbing, back slapping and finger pointing..pull you bloody fingers out and do something for crying out loud..
what's your view on the whole situation mate? do you think Madge should be moved on?
I don't think it's a question of should.. a week ago personally I would have stuck the course with him ...now given what has transpired and how the place operates he's gone..
That will not change a thing IMO...
Good luck to the next guy...
@tilllindemann said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465705) said:@aturkey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465696) said:@tilllindemann said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465652) said:@aturkey said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465644) said:Madge has only had success in the NRL with a team that had Greg Inglis (in his peak), Luke Keary and Adam Reynolds as halves (Legit perfect halves pairing), Sam Burgess (in his peak) and two hookers of Isaac Luke (in his peak) and a handy replacement in Api Korisau.
If we're not going to count premierships that have good players in the team, we're not going to be counting many premierships at all. Clubs like the Roosters have fielded teams where every.single.player is a representative.
I understand it's an achievement but I really don't think it's as relevant as everyone is making it out to be. People seem to put Madge in a tier above others because of that prem, which is ludicrous to me considering the talent. He's about the same as Paul Green.
He is *definitely* in a tier above Green, Morris, Ciraldo, Payten, etc.
If the Souths premiership was his only success maybe you could say he fluked it, but he also won a premiership in a different comp with totally different players, and he has had success as a test coach with NZ. To have success in three different forms of our sport suggests he is in fact very adaptable, in contrast with the clichés self-serving media commentators trot out about him.
He started his time at WT with a screwed cap and the oldest squad in the NRL, now he has the youngest squad in the NRL. He should be judged on how he progresses with those youngsters, not judged on how he went with inherited duds like Mbye, Reynolds, Packer etc. But looks like he won't get that chance because of the jokers who run this club.
@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465713) said:@needaname said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465663) said:@jirskyr said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465336) said:@needaname said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1464979) said:Imagine a struggling club giving the SuperCoach a 10 day deadline to decide if he is going to leave his current club a year early.
Should of, from day one agreed to move on from Cleary internally, agreed with Bennett to start in 2020 and figured out the rest afterwards.
That's not the narrative though. There wasn't a guarantee Bennett would ever leave Brisbane, because it was a tug of war between him and certain senior elements on the Broncos Board.
Bennett said, now in writing, he was open to taking the Tigers position but couldn't honourably leave his Broncos side a year early (also contractually he's not permitted to). Now maybe Bennett is some mad loyalist or maybe he was forcing the Broncos' hand for a super-duper payout for his troubles, but whatever the reason he was hanging around until at least the end of his contract, and if he could outstay or out-result the naysayers within the Broncos, there's also a chance he re-signs with Broncos. Wayne Bennett is not a political mug, he's been at it for a very long time.
So I don't see anywhere suggested that Bennett was willing to sign on for 2020 with Tigers without knowing his exact future at Broncos. That was never the offer and I've never heard it said that Bennett was willing to come a year later. Bennett has only ever said "I can't leave the Broncos right now". And then, months later, Bennett gets the chop.
Well you can read between the lines. When someone says I want to coach you but I still have a year left with Brisbane and I’m not going to leave them without finishing the job does give an indication that he was ready to move on.
Bennett knew he was being moved on but he was angling for the payout. No way he was ever going to quit.
@tigerpower said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465689) said:Madge is gone. I hope brooks the white ant is gone with him.
@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1465348) said:I dont think the club is dumb enough to punt Madge.
He isnt perfect, but
He is the only one with a heart beat in the joint.
Were lucky if he stays.
I have been 100% in this camp until now. THere is clearly something badly broken and it is not being fixed. The most likely problem is the coach. It is possible that somehow its not Madges fault, but somehow the board, but less likely IMO.