On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being "no issue whatsoever" and 5 being "major horrible trauma" I consider the vacation to be a 2. It's not nothing, but it's insignificant.
If it really has no bearing on what the club is doing right now, then that's the end of it for me. If Pascoe being away makes no practical difference between last week and this week, then fine it makes no difference and not worth getting worked up about.
I'll say it again - he will have had his holiday's approved and planned already, he isn't just going rogue a la Sonny Bill and disappearing without notice.
Perception is irrelevant, the CEO's job is not a popularity contest. The only thing that will turn Tigers around is wins. The perception of Tigers cannot really get worse, we are already soaked to the bone. The media will invent things to complain about as they pile the muck on. It's not just generating content - portions of the media appear to revel in the sick pleasure of flogging dead horses.
They invented a story with James Roberts on the pokies, they invented a story about Pascoe taking a vacation. People got upset because Daine Laurie wore a Panthers jersey last year. I understand the responses to these incidents but they are all rather primal, primitive, non-constructive responses.
Who knows, maybe Pascoe is on stress leave and he has been given time off for his mental health. Imagine that, if Pascoe came back and pulled the Mitchell Moses "mental health" card. Would people still want to pile on then?