Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053477) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053474) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053473) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053469) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053468) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053466) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053465) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053458) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053449) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053447) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053437) said:
we didn’t get dwz so what difference does it make now.

We didn't get him because we couldn't pay him!

The Pom indicated otherwise.

https://weststigersforum.com/topic/29589/dwz-to-arrive-asap/461

I'm guessing you missed this post then?

https://weststigersforum.com/post/1020529


No I didn’t, and it doesn’t back up what you’re trying to say either. They had to revise the offer but dogs swept in quickly and took him.

We didn't have the money to pay him so we were looking at a backended deal that we didn't have time to organise! That is exactly what I am saying!

So we could have got him, we just needed to backend it slightly and we didn’t have time.

No we didn't have the money to offer him so he signed with the Dogs.


I read it that we ran out of time and the dogs came in. But anyway let’s just agree to disagree.

Why didn't we make him a revised offer?


The way I read it is that we were trying to revise the offer and during that time the dogs came in and he signed with them.

Don't worry. We saved our money.
 
@Newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053609) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053477) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053474) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053473) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053469) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053468) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053466) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053465) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053458) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053449) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053447) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053437) said:
we didn’t get dwz so what difference does it make now.

We didn't get him because we couldn't pay him!

The Pom indicated otherwise.

https://weststigersforum.com/topic/29589/dwz-to-arrive-asap/461

I'm guessing you missed this post then?

https://weststigersforum.com/post/1020529


No I didn’t, and it doesn’t back up what you’re trying to say either. They had to revise the offer but dogs swept in quickly and took him.

We didn't have the money to pay him so we were looking at a backended deal that we didn't have time to organise! That is exactly what I am saying!

So we could have got him, we just needed to backend it slightly and we didn’t have time.

No we didn't have the money to offer him so he signed with the Dogs.


I read it that we ran out of time and the dogs came in. But anyway let’s just agree to disagree.

Why didn't we make him a revised offer?


The way I read it is that we were trying to revise the offer and during that time the dogs came in and he signed with them.

Don't worry. We saved our money.

Actually smarter than that increase payment to players extended this year ..so as to give more space in future caps..to sign better players
 
@Jimmy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053699) said:
@Nelson where does that leave Mbye? 6? As benji will be retired come 2021

A year's a long time, Mbye may not even be here in 2021 or he could be playing hooker or utility. If Maguire is going to go out and sign Lomax though it'll be for good coin and he will play him in his best position which is at centre.
 
@Nelson very true...let’s say we can’t offload contracts how’s this come 2021
2.momo
4.lomax
6.mbye
9.liddle
14.grub
 
@Jimmy I wouldn’t like to think that Momo makes the side in 2021 if I’m going to be completely honest. He is a stop gap but we need speed as per your line up, Lomax can kick goals.
 
@Madge said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053714) said:
In terms of fullbacks... is Thompson going to be wearing the number 1 moving forward?

Unless we sign someone....yes.
 
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053478) said:
I see the Probability of a Damn We thought We had him thread developing.

Was hoping that you had already moved anything further to the recent above across to it.
 
@Jimmy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053708) said:
@Nelson very true...let’s say we can’t offload contracts how’s this come 2021
2.momo
4.lomax
6.mbye
9.liddle
14.grub

I hope that's not how we're lining up in 2021 to be honest. I prefer Momirovski as a centre (prefer more pace on the wing) and I'd be looking at options other than Mbye for 5/8. Maguire might invest another off season into Mbye at fullback if he thinks his form there this season was impacted by injury.
 
Surely Dragons would take one of Mbye/Reynolds off of our hands...

Either would slot in nicely in their no. 6

Packer should not have been this hard to offload...

Matulino/Mcqueen need to be medically retired..correct me if I am wrong but that is almost 1 million between them..

Mbye going would free up 400-500k

Reynolds 400-500k

I like the looks of Momo, so he and Talau can lock down the centre spots. Nofa can keep his wing, maybe invest in another winger.

Need a fullback, 5/8, hooker, forwards...
 
@jrtiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053736) said:
if Madge gets his way, I think we're moving towards a spine of

1 Lomax
6 Brimson
7 Brooks
9 Liddle
14 Simpkin

I think you are right, but I think Simpkin will be our number one hooker from what I have seen and read, so him and Liddle swap, assuming Liddle doesn't break again
 
@momo_amp_medo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053581) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053468) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053466) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053465) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053458) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053449) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053447) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053437) said:
we didn’t get dwz so what difference does it make now.

We didn't get him because we couldn't pay him!

The Pom indicated otherwise.

https://weststigersforum.com/topic/29589/dwz-to-arrive-asap/461

I'm guessing you missed this post then?

https://weststigersforum.com/post/1020529


No I didn’t, and it doesn’t back up what you’re trying to say either. They had to revise the offer but dogs swept in quickly and took him.

We didn't have the money to pay him so we were looking at a backended deal that we didn't have time to organise! That is exactly what I am saying!

So we could have got him, we just needed to backend it slightly and we didn’t have time.


You are WRONG.


I meant Cochise is WRONG.
 
I'm sorry guys,

We aren't getting new toys till we have finished or donated the old ones....

TBH no one wants the old ones especially if there hidden and no one can see em.

2021 at the earliest.

Ps thx Cleary.
 
Back
Top