@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053477) said:@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053474) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053473) said:@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053469) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053468) said:@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053466) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053465) said:@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053458) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053449) said:@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053447) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053437) said:we didn’t get dwz so what difference does it make now.
We didn't get him because we couldn't pay him!
The Pom indicated otherwise.
https://weststigersforum.com/topic/29589/dwz-to-arrive-asap/461
I'm guessing you missed this post then?
https://weststigersforum.com/post/1020529
No I didn’t, and it doesn’t back up what you’re trying to say either. They had to revise the offer but dogs swept in quickly and took him.
We didn't have the money to pay him so we were looking at a backended deal that we didn't have time to organise! That is exactly what I am saying!
So we could have got him, we just needed to backend it slightly and we didn’t have time.
No we didn't have the money to offer him so he signed with the Dogs.
I read it that we ran out of time and the dogs came in. But anyway let’s just agree to disagree.
Why didn't we make him a revised offer?
The way I read it is that we were trying to revise the offer and during that time the dogs came in and he signed with them.
Don't worry. We saved our money.