Wests Tigers Deep Dive of the Week

Is there interest in doing a weekly "Deep Dive" to promote focussed discussion between games?

  • Yes, I would be happy develop a topic or two to get the ball rolling

    Votes: 5 23.8%
  • Yes, I would be happy to participate but not lead a topic

    Votes: 7 33.3%
  • I am not likely to contribute; however, I would be interested in learning from the discussion

    Votes: 6 28.6%
  • Would prefer to watch paint dry

    Votes: 3 14.3%

  • Total voters
    21
  • Poll closed .
I'm pushig for a ball paying 13. I would prefer AD is not the 13; however, as shown in the Deep Dive - he is our best internal option. If he is seriously being considered as the 13 we need to bite the bullet and train him as one - the next man up them becomes Madden. He is serviceable, has a good kicking game and with the right game plan could be a good fit while Latu gets fit/develops.
I think this scenario makes the most sense and as of right now, I think AD is our best option at 13, considering who is available and at what cost. I think he is more than capable of the level required, as long as he has a pre season there and can concentrate on developing as a 13.
I think Madden is important for not just his skillset but his experience at the Broncos and what he can bring to training. I also think Luai needs to accept his role at WT differs from Penrith and play a more direct, semi structured style. That scrum base just needs more consistency so the seemingly ever changing outside backs are aware and make the most of attacking opportunities.
I'm not sure how many games we had the same halves pair, same centre pair, same wing pair or same 13 in any two games last year but it wasn't many, with LG going, Latu injured, Taylan May coming back, T'oa and Skelton injuries, even Bula out for a few. If the next man up can fit in to a "system" points will be easier to come by.
 
I think this scenario makes the most sense and as of right now, I think AD is our best option at 13, considering who is available and at what cost. I think he is more than capable of the level required, as long as he has a pre season there and can concentrate on developing as a 13.
I think Madden is important for not just his skillset but his experience at the Broncos and what he can bring to training. I also think Luai needs to accept his role at WT differs from Penrith and play a more direct, semi structured style. That scrum base just needs more consistency so the seemingly ever changing outside backs are aware and make the most of attacking opportunities.
I'm not sure how many games we had the same halves pair, same centre pair, same wing pair or same 13 in any two games last year but it wasn't many, with LG going, Latu injured, Taylan May coming back, T'oa and Skelton injuries, even Bula out for a few. If the next man up can fit in to a "system" points will be easier to come by.
We didn't have as many injuries as some teams but the ones we had did hurt and interrupted the team as did the Galvin saga, a lot on here don't take that into consideration when summing up the season performance.
 
Wests Tigers Deep Dive 16: Lessons from the Best NRL Clubs – What the Tigers Can Learn from the Panthers, Storm, Broncos, and Roosters

Given the gripes on the forum in relation to how we go about recruitment and retention along with the development of the club as a whole I thought it may be a good time to look at other successful clubs to determine if there is anything we can take away from their systems and approaches. A few of the previous deep dives have touched on aspects of this topic but none of them in a wholistic sense. In this deep dive the plan is to look at the club comprehensively to identify where we are heading in the right direction and what work is still left to do.

As it stands the club may have identified internally its identity and direction; however, this is invisible to the fan base in the form of style or metrics. This should be communicated to the support base. While we have had a stable coaching structure at NRL level, it is not supported by a development structure and nor has there been suitable messaging. While it is important to keep decisions in house; high level communication with the fan base would ease a lot of angst.


The fan base doesn’t expect to be playing in the NRL grand final in 2026, although that would be nice. What the fans expect is a professional, data-informed football department operating under a unified strategic direction.

Introduction, Aim and Methodology

The modern NRL landscape is defined by sustained dominance from four clubs — the Penrith Panthers, Melbourne Storm, Brisbane Broncos, and Sydney Roosters. These teams have established themselves as perennial contenders through contrasting but equally effective systems: the Storm’s coaching discipline, the Panthers’ pathway machine, the Broncos’ resurgence through culture and athleticism, and the Roosters’ precision in roster and performance management.

Wests Tigers are rebuilding after years of inconsistency and turnover. It is likely that the new board, under Shane Richardson, has undertaken significant soul-searching to identify lessons that can be integrated into the Tigers’ framework in order to construct a high-performance organisation that is not reliant on short-term fixes or reactive signings.

Aim

The aim of this deep dive is to identify the common structural, cultural, and tactical principles that underpin long-term success among the NRL’s benchmark clubs, and to apply those lessons to the Wests Tigers to highlight both areas of progress and key shortfalls that must be addressed to achieve sustainable competitiveness.

Methodology

  1. Comparative Analysis: The Panthers, Storm, Broncos, and Roosters were examined across five pillars of success:
    • Culture and Coaching Stability
    • Junior Development and Succession Systems
    • Recruitment and Salary-Cap Management
    • Analytics and Process-Driven Decision Making
    • On-Field Identity and Role Clarity
  2. Performance Review: Club reports, public data, and performance trends were analysed to determine what practices have sustained elite performance over multiple seasons.
  3. Translational Evaluation: Findings were assessed through the lens of the current Wests Tigers football program, as it is known, focusing on how the club can adapt successful principles within its existing resources and development pathways.
Executive Summary

The four powerhouse clubs share a single unifying trait — alignment.

While each operates differently, they all maintain consistency across coaching, recruitment, and development. Their systems allow them to lose star players without collapse, and to introduce new talent seamlessly into established structures.

For Wests Tigers, the key takeaway is not imitation but translation; adapting what works for those clubs into the Tigers’ context. This means embedding coaching stability, defining a clear on-field identity, building pathways, and creating professional standards that reward performance and accountability.
The expected outcome: a cohesive football identity, data-supported recruitment and retention strategy, and a player development system that is capable of producing sustained competitiveness.

1. Culture and Coaching Stability – The Melbourne Storm Standard

The Storm’s success has been built on the back of continuity, clarity, and culture.
Craig Bellamy’s program has produced a decade of consistency because every coach, player, and staff member operates under the same behavioural framework. Standards never fluctuate, regardless of personnel changes. Every player understands their role, and accountability is uniform across the club.

Lesson for Wests Tigers:

Create a long-term coaching identity that survives changes in personnel. Define what “Wests Tigers football” looks like — its tempo, attacking and defensive attitudes, and effort profile — and embed it across all levels of the organisation. Back the head coach and staff for multiple seasons to ensure consistency of message and standards. This should be supported by a coach development programme as identified in the Deep Dive 2; “Building a Best-Practice Coaching System for the Wests Tigers: A Blueprint for Long-Term Success”

2. Junior Development and Succession Systems – The Penrith Conveyor Belt
The Panthers’ system is the modern blueprint for development excellence. Their pathways are fully integrated from junior reps to NRL, with aligned coaching philosophies and shared tactical language. Local talent is identified early, nurtured in system-aligned environments, and promoted when ready — producing a self-replenishing roster.

Lesson for Wests Tigers:

Ensure that the Balmain, Western Suburbs, and Macarthur development pathways are under a unified football curriculum. Establish shared coaching principles, fitness benchmarks, and play styles.

Unify the NRL and KoE teams as Wests Tigers to develop the clubs identity and next man up programme.

Prioritise a “three-player fast track” model each year — promoting high-potential juniors into full-time NRL training to accelerate readiness. This does not mean that they are offered early Top 30 contracts; however, it provides them with exposure to the top grade and the pathway to achieving it.

Much of this was covered in Deep Dive 3; What is the benefit of Wests Tigers operating as a development club?

3. Recruitment and Salary-Cap Management – The Roosters’ Ruthless Precision
The Roosters have mastered the art of roster discipline. Their model combines forward-planned recruitment cycles, elite professionalism, and high off-field standards. They make unemotional list management decisions — moving players early, reinvesting cap space wisely, and maintaining balance between stars and role players. Every signing fits both their playing system and club standards.

Lesson for Wests Tigers:

Adopt a data-led, succession-based recruitment and retention plan.
  • Build a contract map to forecast retention, internal promotion, and external targeting by position.
  • Prioritise character, adaptability, and professionalism over short-term value.
  • Use mid-tier recruitment strategically to complement development players rather than block them.
  • Identify shortfalls and ruthlessly fill them to ensure success.
By 2027, the Tigers should aim to eliminate cap inefficiency (legacy deals and overpayments) to less than 15%. It appears that we are trending in this direction; however, it is very difficult to get a handle on as Wests Tigers do not discuss recruitment in the open forum.

to be continued below...
 
continued

4. Recruitment Discipline and Pathway Integration – The Panthers and Broncos Balance

Both the Panthers and Broncos have shown that roster sustainability depends on balancing internal talent with external precision.
  • Penrith replace stars with system-trained players.
  • Brisbane’s resurgence came from combining elite athletes developed internally (Walsh, Mam, Haas) with key external experience (Reynolds)
Lesson for Wests Tigers:
Adopt a hybrid model:
  • Develop local juniors through a structured program (development club).
  • Fill key leadership and tactical gaps with experienced professionals who fit the Wests Tigers’ identity.
  • Ensure no position or group lacks an internal replacement plan.
  • Identify and develop the next man in every player chain. Recruit early against identified shortfalls
5. Analytics and Process-Driven Decision Making – The Common Denominator
All four powerhouses rely on objective data to guide football decisions:
  • Storm: training loads and error prevention.
  • Panthers: play-the-ball tempo and decoy impact.
  • Broncos: contact intensity and field position analytics.
  • Roosters: set-end efficiency and defensive rotations.
Lesson for Wests Tigers:
The club has analysts and tracks weekly metrics. The data that is analysed in unknown but it would be expected to include ruck speed, tackle efficiency, error rate, and kick effectiveness. The goal is to ensure that performance reviews are data-driven, not subjective, and recruitment and retention decisions are, for the most part, data driven.

Football is as much an art as a science so data can’t rule; however, linking analytics to recruitment and retention (profiling players who fit the club’s game tempo and structure) will have us making wise decisions.

6. On-Field Identity and Role Clarity – Translating Systems into Style
Each benchmark club exhibits a clear playing identity:
  • Storm: precision, discipline, and execution.
  • Panthers: relentless middle dominance and fast tempo.
  • Broncos: physicality and explosive transition play.
  • Roosters: structured edge attack and defensive cohesion.
Lesson for Wests Tigers:
We have been developing something for a couple of seasons now, it appears to be along the lines of a family club with “eyes up” attacking style.

This isn’t a football style and nor is it a values based structure. Sure, the system is immature in the sense that some of the building blocks have yet to be embedded throughout the club so as a result the system is still clunky.

Wests Tigers clearly has developed an identity that it, for some reason, has chosen to keep in house. The club should be proud of its direction and decision and announce what that is as opposed to hiding behind a veil of secrecy - where Richo and Benji are aware fothe plan and are executing it.

By season 2026 the Wests Tigers roster should be capable of demonstrating the system and its commitment to it.

The key to success is having every player understanding the club’s identity and their role within the system. All recruitment, training, and selection decisions must reinforce that identity, not dilute it.

Why the club chooses to refrain from announcing our identity is a mystery; the decision has been made – be proud of it and make it known.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
AreaTarget by End of 2026
Player Development2 pathways players established in NRL squad (this must be capability based – not established simply to achieve the goal)
Recruitment100% positional succession coverage
Performance MetricsRecruitment and retention decisions based on performance metrics with a dose of common sense to ensure that the art of the game is retained
Culture80% compliance with weekly behaviour standards
Cap Management<15% legacy or overpayment contracts

Risks and Mitigation
RiskDescriptionMitigation
Short-term pressure for resultsFans and media impatiencePublicly communicate our identify and a 3-year plan with milestones
Resistance to new standardsPlayer buy-in challengesLeadership group involvement in design
Cap rigidityLimited flexibility due to prior contractsStagger exits and prioritise retention

Expected Outcomes by the End of 2026
  • A clear football identity visible in style and metrics.
  • A stable coaching and development structure with aligned messaging.
  • Two or more pathway graduates in the top 30.
  • Measurable improvement in play-the-ball speed, tackle efficiency, and completion rates.
  • A professional, data-informed football department operating under a unified strategic direction.

So what else can we pull from the top clubs to get us back to playing finals football consistently from 2026?
 
continued

4. Recruitment Discipline and Pathway Integration – The Panthers and Broncos Balance

Both the Panthers and Broncos have shown that roster sustainability depends on balancing internal talent with external precision.

  • Penrith replace stars with system-trained players.
  • Brisbane’s resurgence came from combining elite athletes developed internally (Walsh, Mam, Haas) with key external experience (Reynolds)
Lesson for Wests Tigers:
Adopt a hybrid model:

  • Develop local juniors through a structured program (development club).
  • Fill key leadership and tactical gaps with experienced professionals who fit the Wests Tigers’ identity.
  • Ensure no position or group lacks an internal replacement plan.
  • Identify and develop the next man in every player chain. Recruit early against identified shortfalls
5. Analytics and Process-Driven Decision Making – The Common Denominator
All four powerhouses rely on objective data to guide football decisions:

  • Storm: training loads and error prevention.
  • Panthers: play-the-ball tempo and decoy impact.
  • Broncos: contact intensity and field position analytics.
  • Roosters: set-end efficiency and defensive rotations.
Lesson for Wests Tigers:
The club has analysts and tracks weekly metrics. The data that is analysed in unknown but it would be expected to include ruck speed, tackle efficiency, error rate, and kick effectiveness. The goal is to ensure that performance reviews are data-driven, not subjective, and recruitment and retention decisions are, for the most part, data driven.

Football is as much an art as a science so data can’t rule; however, linking analytics to recruitment and retention (profiling players who fit the club’s game tempo and structure) will have us making wise decisions.

6. On-Field Identity and Role Clarity – Translating Systems into Style
Each benchmark club exhibits a clear playing identity:

  • Storm: precision, discipline, and execution.
  • Panthers: relentless middle dominance and fast tempo.
  • Broncos: physicality and explosive transition play.
  • Roosters: structured edge attack and defensive cohesion.
Lesson for Wests Tigers:
We have been developing something for a couple of seasons now, it appears to be along the lines of a family club with “eyes up” attacking style.

This isn’t a football style and nor is it a values based structure. Sure, the system is immature in the sense that some of the building blocks have yet to be embedded throughout the club so as a result the system is still clunky.

Wests Tigers clearly has developed an identity that it, for some reason, has chosen to keep in house. The club should be proud of its direction and decision and announce what that is as opposed to hiding behind a veil of secrecy - where Richo and Benji are aware fothe plan and are executing it.

By season 2026 the Wests Tigers roster should be capable of demonstrating the system and its commitment to it.

The key to success is having every player understanding the club’s identity and their role within the system. All recruitment, training, and selection decisions must reinforce that identity, not dilute it.

Why the club chooses to refrain from announcing our identity is a mystery; the decision has been made – be proud of it and make it known.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

AreaTarget by End of 2026
Player Development2 pathways players established in NRL squad (this must be capability based – not established simply to achieve the goal)
Recruitment100% positional succession coverage
Performance MetricsRecruitment and retention decisions based on performance metrics with a dose of common sense to ensure that the art of the game is retained
Culture80% compliance with weekly behaviour standards
Cap Management<15% legacy or overpayment contracts

Risks and Mitigation

RiskDescriptionMitigation
Short-term pressure for resultsFans and media impatiencePublicly communicate our identify and a 3-year plan with milestones
Resistance to new standardsPlayer buy-in challengesLeadership group involvement in design
Cap rigidityLimited flexibility due to prior contractsStagger exits and prioritise retention

Expected Outcomes by the End of 2026

  • A clear football identity visible in style and metrics.
  • A stable coaching and development structure with aligned messaging.
  • Two or more pathway graduates in the top 30.
  • Measurable improvement in play-the-ball speed, tackle efficiency, and completion rates.
  • A professional, data-informed football department operating under a unified strategic direction.

So what else can we pull from the top clubs to get us back to playing finals football consistently from 2026?
A lot of money.

I'm not being facetious Jolls. Your deep dive is not only impressive and most likely 100% spot on, but those 4 clubs are also in the enviable position of having plenty of dough. The Dogs, going forward, can probably be thrown into the mix now the Laundy's have jumped on board.
Everything you have stated above is much easier when you have more money.
 
A lot of money.

I'm not being facetious Jolls. Your deep dive is not only impressive and most likely 100% spot on, but those 4 clubs are also in the enviable position of having plenty of dough. The Dogs, going forward, can probably be thrown into the mix now the Laundy's have jumped on board.
Everything you have stated above is much easier when you have more money.
That is definitely true, but it doesn't take big dollars to set standard, hold players and staff accountable, develop a coaching development plan that is based on understudying a higher level coach and having a consistent theme. BWG has already had a fair crack at a development plan with a man up system showing depth etc. and I expect that it already exists - we also have our stats dude and dudette so it wouldn't take much to develop recruiting and retention plans based on palying metrics, plus a good dose of common sense.

It also doesnt cost a cent for Benji and Richo to announce the clubs reason for being and how we intend to play the game - it would come across a hell of a lot better then Benji stating that Richo knows the plan and we're heading in the same dorection. How hard would it be to tell the fan base about the plan - not in detail but in overview?

I 100% agree on the money front and it is why the key is translating what they do well across to our system as opposed to trying to copy them. We simply couldn't keep up - but with smarts we could potentially be a much better club than we currently are. It is hard to know becasue the cards are being held too close to the chest.

The $ allows for more staff, better equipement, more developent opportunities (eg coaching consultants), less workload, better facilities, more talent scouts etc. It definitely helps and is probably why Richo was so keen to turn around the balance sheet. I assume that HBG has promised a bag of gold that can be supplemented by anything earned by Wests Tigers. I would be pretty pissed off if they cut their contributions based on the club earning a profit.
 
That is definitely true, but it doesn't take big dollars to set standard, hold players and staff accountable, develop a coaching development plan that is based on understudying a higher level coach and having a consistent theme. BWG has already had a fair crack at a development plan with a man up system showing depth etc. and I expect that it already exists - we also have our stats dude and dudette so it wouldn't take much to develop recruiting and retention plans based on palying metrics, plus a good dose of common sense.

It also doesnt cost a cent for Benji and Richo to announce the clubs reason for being and how we intend to play the game - it would come across a hell of a lot better then Benji stating that Richo knows the plan and we're heading in the same dorection. How hard would it be to tell the fan base about the plan - not in detail but in overview?

I 100% agree on the money front and it is why the key is translating what they do well across to our system as opposed to trying to copy them. We simply couldn't keep up - but with smarts we could potentially be a much better club than we currently are. It is hard to know becasue the cards are being held too close to the chest.

The $ allows for more staff, better equipement, more developent opportunities (eg coaching consultants), less workload, better facilities, more talent scouts etc. It definitely helps and is probably why Richo was so keen to turn around the balance sheet. I assume that HBG has promised a bag of gold that can be supplemented by anything earned by Wests Tigers. I would be pretty pissed off if they cut their contributions based on the club earning a profit.
Right again Jolls. Tim Sheens Tigers were the best ever, win or lose. At least you knew those teams were going out to play footy. If Benji is trying to somehow, or in some form, replicate that, we'd all be happy for him to let us know. If it fails, so be it, but at least we'd have some hope and understanding. And be entertained!
 
My wish is Godinet is coached as 13 in KOE
He appears to have the smarts and at 17 years, 95kg and growing is a good start.
I haven't seen him play but from all reports he sounds like a prospect, it would be smart to develop early in a position we are screaming out for especially if he can pass well and possesses a footy head.

If he can be shaped into a ball playing 13 in the coming years, I know Jolls will be happy.
 
My wish is Godinet is coached as 13 in KOE
He appears to have the smarts and at 17 years, 95kg and growing is a good start.
BWG has already identified Havea Jr as being developed the likely in house solution and he won't ready until around 28. So even if Godinet and Havea Jr were developed it still leves us short in 26 and 27.

I haven't seen him play but from all reports he sounds like a prospect, it would be smart to develop early in a position we are screaming out for especially if he can pass well and possesses a footy head.

If he can be shaped into a ball playing 13 in the coming years, I know Jolls will be happy.
I'm happy that we have future plans in place
Unfortunately nobody tidentified to cover the glaring hole in the short term
 
BWG has already identified Havea Jr as being developed the likely in house solution and he won't ready until around 28. So even if Godinet and Havea Jr were developed it still leves us short in 26 and 27.


I'm happy that we have future plans in place
Unfortunately nobody tidentified to cover the glaring hole in the short term
Would not be surprised if we pick up Adam Elliott on a 1+1 mutual option type deal. Not the link man style lock you are after @Jolls but he can ball play and is a better option to rotate with AD at lock than Twal or Bird imo. Would allow Twal to go into the prop rotation & Bird to be an edge utility.
 
Jolls always a pleasure to read your post

  • Junior Development and Succession Systems/skills development.
from Stefano/Bore/ Papili/Garner have stated the biggest difference between there new clubs and ours has been amongst others lack of real skill development. This a area this club needs to address and change.
 
Im no expert but that seems like very poor development
Godinet is an exceptional back rower, all his rep honours have been at backrow...i wouldnt be mucking around with something that doesnt appear to need fixing
Galvin played 2RW in our H. Matts side and other rep. sides.
And then he went to the halves, while he gets big enough to be a lock, if you believe the rumours.
Godinet appears to be smarter, bigger, than Galvin and we need a lock.
Picking winners at a young age [Havea Jr the lock apparent] is fraught with danger.
IMO no harm having options. May the best lock win!
PS. Backrowers tend to fall from trees much more often than locks.
 
Would not be surprised if we pick up Adam Elliott on a 1+1 mutual option type deal. Not the link man style lock you are after @Jolls but he can ball play and is a better option to rotate with AD at lock than Twal or Bird imo. Would allow Twal to go into the prop rotation & Bird to be an edge utility.
Elliot would definitely be serviceable and, with the right guidance, could act as a link. I agree, better than Bird and could support AD (if that is the choice that is made).
 
Lol you're really pushing for Adam at 13, It's obvious that's his end goal but I still think he will play 7 early rounds, Latu will not be ready at 7 for a few rounds that's provided he doesn't break down again, always a worry.
So am I, because, let's get real, there are a bunch of reasons why Adam remains at WT next season on a much reduced contract. Top of the list is that other clubs, along with pretty well everyone other than a relative few on here, don't see him as an NRL level halves player.

Jolls, I and others could be wrong, though I expect that the Madden signing confirmed that Doueihi is already training for his move to 13, plus Latu will likely be ready to begin our season in round 2.
 
So am I, because, let's get real, there are a bunch of reasons why Adam remains at WT next season on a much reduced contract. Top of the list is that other clubs, along with pretty well everyone other than a relative few on here, don't see him as an NRL level halves player.

Jolls, I and others could be wrong, though I expect that the Madden signing confirmed that Doueihi is already training for his move to 13, plus Latu will likely be ready to begin our season in round 2.
I doubt Latu will be ready to play the hole game at 7 by round 2, it would be very risky, prefer he was eased in from the bench.
 
I doubt Latu will be ready to play the hole game at 7 by round 2, it would be very risky, prefer he was eased in from the bench.

You might be right and we will know soon enough. Still, for mine the injury post surgery is either repaired then healed or not, and the same for subsequent muscle redevelopment upon being given the all clear.

Basically, barring complications, I would expect an already fit youngster to be fully recovered and raring to go well within 6 months, after having returned in the new year to go straight into joining the non-contact field sessions.
 
Last edited:
You might be right and we will know soon enough. Still, for mine the injury post surgery is either repaired then healed or not, and the same for subsequent muscle redevelopment upon being given the all clear.

Basically, barring complications, I would expect an already fit youngster to be fully recovered and raring to go well within 6 months, after having returned in the new year to go straight into joining the non-contact field sessions.
I'm not overly concerned with Latu's return. I would prefer he is fully fit and has a few miles in his legs to ensure he is right for the long haul. We have Madden (and AD if he isn't playing 13) as the next men up. If we are going to develop a winning team we need to have depth - we may heve to test that depth in the first few rounds.
 
Last edited:
A less contentions subject for us to debate. I think we all agree that our defence in 2025 was one of our weak points. Richos comments about our right edge combined with the way we gave up simple points at crucial times are clear enough indicators of our need to improve in this area. Part of the solution is based on our ability to get out of our own end and have the oppostion starting sets deeper in their own half, but the mot important aspect is how we play when the pill isn't in our hands.

Deep Dive 17. Line Speed and Defensive Intensity: How the Wests Tigers Become a Tougher Defensive Unit

Defence goes a long way to winning. There are schools of thought that Defence is the core to building a winning team. There are other schools of thought that are based more on attack than defence – but suffice to say: defence is a critical enabler regardless of the which school of thought you align yourself with.

So what is defence? It is a combination of line speed, aggression at the ruck and tackling technique/wrestling. Effective defence forces mistakes and lowers the opposition’s strike rate.

Where Wests Tigers sit now (end 2025). (This is the defensive problem to solve)
  • We improved in patches but remain inconsistent in controlling the middle and in generating line speed. The opposition frequently create time and space through our slow or hesitant edges, soft tacklers and our defenders being sucked inwards; creating gaps/overlaps. Our right edge has been suspect in particular; however, the problem really exists across the park.
  • The recruitment of Kai Pearce-Paul as a high-work rate edge is a step in the right direction. He is a player that should lift our right-edge aggression and help cut down overlaps. But one signing won’t fix our systemic defensive issues.
Why line speed matters

Line speed isn’t just “running up quickly”. It is a coordinated team trigger that forces the attacking team to play faster, make rushed decisions, and limits second-phase play. When executed correctly it:
  • Denies the ball-carrier time, forcing hurried passes/footwork and increased handling errors;
  • Compresses attacking options and funnels play into areas where the defence has strength;
  • Allows post-contact defensive scramble to be more effective because less momentum has been built by the attacking side.
What do Wests Tigers need to change to increase our defensive intensity?

Personnel & role clarity.
Each edge requires an on-field leader to coordinate and manage defensive intensity. This player should be the trigger for line speed calls. The players need to lead by example in tackle volume and physicality to force teams to hesitate on that side. Ideally that should be KPP on one edge and Sam F on the other; however, intensity could be set by the 13 or 9 on either side of the ruck just as easily. The key Is ensuring clarity.
  • Addition recruitment. We are short two key personnel:
    • A mobile, aggressive middle forward who can contest the ruck and tackles and also slow the play-the-ball. A defensive alpha to lead the pack. Terrell May has a good work rate but does not win the collision often enough.
    • A disciplined centre who can finish tackles and not drift. Starford Toa does a job; however, his defence, at times, is below par. Recruitment/replacement needs to prioritise high tackle efficiency. Can Makasini develop into that role? Does Taylan May shift sides to accommodate this?
Tactical adjustments
  • Aggressive early set speed from the markers and adjacent middles to pin the dummy half where possible and force the opposition to play early. This coordinated approach denies, where practicable, the ability of the dummy half to engage the A and B defender allowing an early defensive shift to apply pressure.
  • The “no suck” rule. Defenders, particularly edge defenders, have to avoid being “sucked in” by inside runners. Outside backs must be capable of handling one on one defensive situations
  • Controlled pressure. Inside pressure is not an automatic response. Inside pressure around the ruck is a must, but drifting across must be a coached response to specific attacking shapes. We need clears rules for when to drift (apply constant inside pressure) and when to remain compressed. Used correctly inside pressure can force the play outwards to squeeze the attack between the outside defenders and the touch line. Inside pressure also provides the required momentum for effective cover/scramble defence to deal with line breaks.
Coaching & culture. Our defence coach must own a “measurable” plan. What isn’t measured can’t be improved so throughout the pre-season (in particular) and into the regular season measured defensive cycles need to be executed with a focus on continuous improvement.
  • Small wins: Start with a “Defence Charter”. For example, “non-negotiables”: line speed, square defensive stance, marker pressure, and clear communication. These must be measured and compliance rewarded publicly.
  • Video with data overlay: GPS + tackle data show players their line speed and missed-tackle patterns in game clips. Visual feedback accelerates behaviour change.
Metrics. The defensive pattern will determine what metrics are useful to the Defence Coach. However, it is likely that the following set will make up the core of the data being measured:
  • Average time to first defensive step (marker reaction time). Target a reduction by 0.2–0.3s over 2025 in preseason with ongoing monitoring to maintain/improve the standard throughout the regular season.
  • Line speed/advantage line percentage. Identify the % of plays where the defensive line is up at/behind the advantage line 1s after the play-the-ball.
  • Missed tackles per game & tackle efficiency. Separate and treat the edges and middles separately.
  • Opposition post-contact metres (PCM). A reduction in PCM reflects better first contact.
The metrics need to be measured throughout the pre-season and weekly during the competition rounds. The metrics must be meaningful and measurable and then presented on a simple dashboard for the team, and individual players, to enable easy self-evaluation of performance levels and areas requiring improvement.

Defensive Risks
  • Risk: Overcommitting to line speed leaves gaps in the defence for grubbers and kicks behind the line.
    • Mitigation: Maintain marker discipline with a focus on identifying kick and drop off cues.
  • Risk: Fatigue from high-intensity defensive sets late in halves/games.
    • Mitigation: conditioning program and rotation plan; staggered line speed responsibilities
What success looks like in 2026
  • Reduced oppositon offloads and second-phase play,
  • Fewer line breaks conceded in first contact,
  • a visible increase in edge tackle pressure and volume.
The eye test: fewer easy sets inside the oppositions 40m, more forced errors, shallow set completion.

I have outlined where I would be heading if I was Benji/Hodgo. What are your thoughts on how we overcome our defensive deficiencies?
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top