OFFICIAL Lachlan Galvin #277 *Released* Career Discussion.

weststigerman said:
Which one does he say that WT don’t see him as half and want to move him?

Leaving to improve his development as a half doesn’t mean anything. Moses did the same thing.
Click to expand...
In an interview earlier this season Lachlan said that ppl at the club had been talking about moving him into the forwards and that he was trying to delay that as long as possible..

Given this context, to claim that his well prepared media statement calling out his development as a half "doesn't mean anything", just means you are ignoring the facts being presented to you.
 
mtd#2 said:
In an interview earlier this season Lachlan said that ppl at the club had been talking about moving him into the forwards and that he was trying to delay that as long as possible..

Given this context, to claim that his well prepared media statement calling out his development as a half "doesn't mean anything", just means you are ignoring the facts being presented to you.
Click to expand...
Link?
 
The Dogs forum is going off. If anything they are smarter than our fans. They have picked up on his erratic, hail mary style plays within 3 weeks which some of our fans didn't see until he signed elsewhere. If he had signed for 5 years at $1.2 million for us it would of been a horrible salary cap blunder. At the moment he is worth $300k, and I don't see his potential exceeding $700k (if that)
 
liltiger said:
Not really Tucker, if the club are he'll bent on trying to keep him you throw a huge contract at him like we did, in the chance it would entice him to stay. He never had any intention to so left the deal without even looking at it. Everything is relative aswell atm the reported $6 for the 5 year upgrade is way overs. But if he goes on to be the Australian 5/8th then it would at that time look like a good deal. In saying that he could become anything he's still only a baby really. Imo what we offered him was way overs, if that's what it took to keep him, better he's gone. He would never have been committed. I totally understand the optics of him leaving after we offered him such a huge deal. I also understand that Richo would have known the only way for him to stay would have been on mega money, so don't begrudge him for trying if he felt in time Galvin could have been our leader, which I just don't see in his personality at all. I can see both sides of the argument on this one.
Click to expand...
You have admitted yourself that he was never going to stay and doesn’t have the personality of a leader.
If you see that, and others see that, then it stands to reason that the club also did?
Under this acknowledgement, the actions around his resigning did not make sense.
 
Mighty_Tiger said:
Galvin should be back in Cup learn the structure then play NRL once he earned it. Sure he deserves to cop some flack as his ego is massive over inflated but the kid just isn’t at the level they need him to be at right now.
Click to expand...
He wasnt at the level we needed him at last year and no one gave a shit.
Fans thought he was a god, ex players thought he was a future Test player.
Dogs will manage him.
 
Tucker said:
Who is going to be administering him with medicine for the entire game if they score 10+ tries against us?
Click to expand...
As long as one of the lads puts a shot on him, I don't care if we lose by 60.. Galvin isn't the reason the dogs are doing well...

If last night is anything to go by he will back in KOE for the rest of the season and only called upon if they have injuries.
 
mtd#2 said:
As long as one of the lads puts a shot on him, I don't care if we lose by 60.. Galvin isn't the reason the dogs are doing well...

If last night is anything to go by he will back in KOE for the rest of the season and only called upon if they have injuries.
Click to expand...
If we lose by 60, it doesn’t matter how many shots are put on him.
He still wins.
The only pure form of revenge is for the club to be more successful than the one he went to.
 
mtd#2 said:
As long as one of the lads puts a shot on him, I don't care if we lose by 60.. Galvin isn't the reason the dogs are doing well...

If last night is anything to go by he will back in KOE for the rest of the season and only called upon if they have injuries.
Click to expand...
As much I hate him, I’m sure he’s tough enough to take a shot. In this day and age, I’m not sure what you would be expecting. It’s not the 80’s. You know at most all that will happen is a few players may mouth off at him. And if they are feeling really game, maybe a bit of push and shove. Then shake hands with him at FT.
 
He wasn't as bad as people are saying last night.

Weird game. Dogs could've been up by more and then totally switched off in the last 15 along with a Mam masterclass.
 
Tucker said:
If we lose by 60, it doesn’t matter how many shots are put on him.
He still wins.
The only pure form of revenge is for the club to be more successful than the one he went to.
Click to expand...
Exactly right. Dogs bundled out in straight sets this year then us finishing higher than him next year is good revenge .. 1st bit could happen but extremely unlikely on the second one
 
Speed2burn said:
Exactly right. Dogs bundled out in straight sets this year then us finishing higher than him next year is good revenge .. 1st bit could happen but extremely unlikely on the second one
Click to expand...
Straight sets implies they’ll still finish top 4. That’s far from a certainty with their run home over the final 5 weeks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 1,348 (members: 5, guests: 1,343)
Back
Top