Pascoe sanctioned by the NRL

[cochise]

gee this has to come to a head very soon , as theres only 6 days left in the month, surely they know what they going to do by now.

The club and Pascoe has put in their submissions.

 

[WT2K]

Now that we've put in our submission anyone have any idea on how long it takes for them to review such things?

 

[bp_tiger]

Now that we've put in our submission anyone have any idea on how long it takes for them to review such things?

they will drag it out so that our season will be over, before we get any decision. :bash :blah

 

[gallagher]

Now that we've put in our submission anyone have any idea on how long it takes for them to review such things?

they will drag it out so that our season will be over, before we get any decision. :bash :blah

And if they finalise it quickly we will claim that they didn't review it thoroughly enough. Either way we get to whinge.
Win win situation.

 

[cqtiger]

Now that we've put in our submission anyone have any idea on how long it takes for them to review such things?

they will drag it out so that our season will be over, before we get any decision. :bash :blah

I can’t seeing it dragging on for too long considering that the NRL put a sanction on the 2019 salary cap. This would give the Tigers a huge option for taking legal action as it would unfairly penalise the Tigers if they win some part of their submission.

 

[gallagher]

I don,t think they have it in for him. I just think they realise the NRL is their meal ticket so it would be unwise to write a story bagging them and pointing out the holes in their argument and the complete bias they show towards certain clubs.

Yeah, the media never bag the NRL. :roll

 

[TYGA]

We are appealing to the same entity that imposed the sanction.

I’m guessing they will suspend the fine for any further breaches, send Pascoe on some nonsense training courses and average out the Cap Penalty will reduce to one year of Farahs contract value not the total.

 

[tiger_one]

We are appealing to the same entity that imposed the sanction.

I’m guessing they will suspend the fine for any further breaches, send Pascoe on some nonsense training courses and average out the Cap Penalty will reduce to one year of Farahs contract value not the total.

I think you have too much commonsense.

 

[jadtiger]

I will believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny before i believe in the impartiality and fairness of Greenberg and the NRL

 

[TheDaBoss]

I will believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny before i believe in the impartiality and fairness of Greenberg and the NRL

x2

Pigs will fly before i do the same

 

[Eddie]

Now that we've put in our submission anyone have any idea on how long it takes for them to review such things?

they will drag it out so that our season will be over, before we get any decision. :bash :blah

And if they finalise it quickly we will claim that they didn't review it thoroughly enough. Either way we get to whinge.
Win win situation.

Does that mean either way you get to whinge gallagher ?? :laughing: :wink:

 

[WT2K]

I will believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny before i believe in the impartiality and fairness of Greenberg and the NRL

x2

Pigs will fly before i do the same

Don't forget the tooth fairy!

 

[gallagher]

Now that we've put in our submission anyone have any idea on how long it takes for them to review such things?

they will drag it out so that our season will be over, before we get any decision. :bash :blah

And if they finalise it quickly we will claim that they didn't review it thoroughly enough. Either way we get to whinge.
Win win situation.

Does that mean either way you get to whinge gallagher ?? :laughing: :wink:

Yeah but i'm only whinging at the whinging. :smiley:

 

[Geo]

I like a good whinging about the whingers post usually confined to FB along with the true supporters but it found it's way here..humph..hurry up off season…

 

[happy_tiger]

I like a good whinging about the whingers post usually confined to FB along with the true supporters but it found it's way here..humph..hurry up off season…

Is that like the selectors who pick the selectors that do the selecting ??

True supporters …..............they all took the last train for the coast .................

 

[jirskyr]

I don't think the other Clubs went cap in hand to the NRL asking for Cap relief for their players claiming they were destabilising figures…only to promise them jobs after footy..

If that is true is was pretty Suss from the outset

Very easy explanation - destabilising on-field as a player, not off-field in some developmental or ambassador role. I don't get why that is such a big deal?

You can want a guy to finish up his playing career without wanting to throw him under the bus. Tigers have been happy to provide gigs for retiring players before and it doesn't necessarily mean they weren't happy to see those players move on.

It can be as simply as Player X does not get on with Coach Y, but has potential talent in other areas for the club, areas that don't directly affect Coach Y (ignoring of course that Coach Y is now sacked, and perhaps even that the CEO assumed a high chance of Coach Y no longer being hired by the time the ambassador role came around).

From the outside without an explanation to the NRL ….....it looks murky

That's my point

Well I'm glad NRL are cracking down on "murky" and have chosen the Tigers first. No other clubs with "murky" stuff in their annual operations.

 

[hammertime]

Now that we've put in our submission anyone have any idea on how long it takes for them to review such things?

Come on man, give them time. They're busy posting billboards in Atlanta. Far more critical.

 

[happy_tiger]

If that is true is was pretty Suss from the outset

Very easy explanation - destabilising on-field as a player, not off-field in some developmental or ambassador role. I don't get why that is such a big deal?

You can want a guy to finish up his playing career without wanting to throw him under the bus. Tigers have been happy to provide gigs for retiring players before and it doesn't necessarily mean they weren't happy to see those players move on.

It can be as simply as Player X does not get on with Coach Y, but has potential talent in other areas for the club, areas that don't directly affect Coach Y (ignoring of course that Coach Y is now sacked, and perhaps even that the CEO assumed a high chance of Coach Y no longer being hired by the time the ambassador role came around).

From the outside without an explanation to the NRL ….....it looks murky

That's my point

Well I'm glad NRL are cracking down on "murky" and have chosen the Tigers first. No other clubs with "murky" stuff in their annual operations.

I'm lost …......I'm agreeing.............your still arguing 😕

 

[jirskyr]

Very easy explanation - destabilising on-field as a player, not off-field in some developmental or ambassador role. I don't get why that is such a big deal?

You can want a guy to finish up his playing career without wanting to throw him under the bus. Tigers have been happy to provide gigs for retiring players before and it doesn't necessarily mean they weren't happy to see those players move on.

It can be as simply as Player X does not get on with Coach Y, but has potential talent in other areas for the club, areas that don't directly affect Coach Y (ignoring of course that Coach Y is now sacked, and perhaps even that the CEO assumed a high chance of Coach Y no longer being hired by the time the ambassador role came around).

From the outside without an explanation to the NRL ….....it looks murky

That's my point

Well I'm glad NRL are cracking down on "murky" and have chosen the Tigers first. No other clubs with "murky" stuff in their annual operations.

I'm lost …......I'm agreeing.............your still arguing 😕

No no not arguing with you, just venting my frustration with the NRL.

 

[happy_tiger]

:smiley:

From the outside without an explanation to the NRL ….....it looks murky

That's my point

Well I'm glad NRL are cracking down on "murky" and have chosen the Tigers first. No other clubs with "murky" stuff in their annual operations.

I'm lost …......I'm agreeing.............your still arguing 😕

No no not arguing with you, just venting my frustration with the NRL.

:smiley:

Swing away then