Paul Momirovski

@hank37w said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486179) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485497) said:
@aturkey said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485491) said:
We are such a stupid club. Momirovski was too good for us. He was vital in many games for Penrith at centre. He's such a quality finisher and was so at our club too.

I completely disagree. Even if we had Laurie and Momirovski playing for us, we would still be finishing between 11-14. Momo is a solid player and has definitely lifted this year behind one of the fittesy and most confident team in recent memory. ***He wouldn't have been this good for us.***

But he was good all along, footy smarts, could find the line and would have been our best centre by a long way, which isn't really giving him the credit he deserves because the standard of what we had was pretty low.

We did him a big favour, but that was only through our own stupdity claiming that he was only going to be our 3rd or 4th favoured centre if he stayed.

If I was Momo I would pay Wests Tigers a visit and say, "kiss my (premiership) ring losers."

Ok, let me get this clear for once and for all. Your argument is that Momorovski left and was let go, purely because he wasnt as good as BJ, JTJ, TT?

Nothing to do with Dane Laurie?
 
If we possessed any sort of negotiating skills, I'm sure we could have got Daine early. The stupidity in us rating Momo as #4 centre was way off.
 
@hank37w said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486188) said:
If we possessed any sort of negotiating skills, I'm sure we could have got Dane early. The stupidity in us rating Momo as #4 centre was way off.

Who says we did?
 
@hank37w said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486188) said:
If we possessed any sort of negotiating skills, I'm sure we could have got Dane early. The stupidity in us rating Momo as #4 centre was way off.

The discussions for Dane were going for over 3 months and Penrith had no intention of releasing him early, we did very well to get him. Look at the Dogs who a lot of people laud for their recruitment at the moment, they were unable to get Burton out of the Panthers in a similar situation.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486146) said:
@harvey said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486114) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485931) said:
@plisskin said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485806) said:
@jirskyr That is not the point.
Fans on here were labelling him useless.
3 out of the past 4 premiership coaches disagree.

The insinuation I’m reading throughout is that tigers (and Madge to suit a narrative) were labelling him useless by offering him for the trade.

You can trade someone and value them at the same time.

They picked BJ, Roberts and Talau ahead of him. Valued like the 5c piece you walk past rather than wasting your time picking it up

The choice wasnt BJ, Roberts, Talau or Momo.

The choice was Laurie or Momo.

That wasn't the choice that was the decision.

And it was a poor one. We could have kept him and still got Laurie. Well run clubs would have.
 
@the_patriot said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486194) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486146) said:
@harvey said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486114) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485931) said:
@plisskin said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485806) said:
@jirskyr That is not the point.
Fans on here were labelling him useless.
3 out of the past 4 premiership coaches disagree.

The insinuation I’m reading throughout is that tigers (and Madge to suit a narrative) were labelling him useless by offering him for the trade.

You can trade someone and value them at the same time.

They picked BJ, Roberts and Talau ahead of him. Valued like the 5c piece you walk past rather than wasting your time picking it up

The choice wasnt BJ, Roberts, Talau or Momo.

The choice was Laurie or Momo.

That wasn't the choice that was the decision.

And it was a poor one. We could have kept him and still got Laurie. Well run clubs would have.

Simply not true.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486191) said:
@hank37w said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486188) said:
If we possessed any sort of negotiating skills, I'm sure we could have got Dane early. The stupidity in us rating Momo as #4 centre was way off.

Who says we did?

The business about Momo being told that he was rated behind BJ, JTJ and Tommy, I think was fairly widely reported on here and in the media.

I think we just need to agree to disagree on this one, but the main point I have been trying to push is that Momo would have been our best centre and not by a short margin.
 
@cochise said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486193) said:
@hank37w said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486188) said:
If we possessed any sort of negotiating skills, I'm sure we could have got Dane early. The stupidity in us rating Momo as #4 centre was way off.

The discussions for Dane were going for over 3 months and Penrith had no intention of releasing him early, we did very well to get him. Look at the Dogs who a lot of people laud for their recruitment at the moment, they were unable to get Burton out of the Panthers in a similar situation.

But without Momiroski did you see Penrith using Daine at all this season?
They had / have Sunai Turiava coming through who played the full season at fullback in NSW cup. By giving us Dane for Momos they got a capable player in a position they didn’t have a lot of depth in yet they would of stunted the development of their rookie fullback and also had been short a centre. (Considering Burton played out the year as one of them).
I’m not unhappy with the end result but. I’m not 100% convinced Penrith had plans for Daine after we had signed him and therefore they probably got the better end of the bargain; at least in the short term.
Long term we won out.
 
@needaname said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486209) said:
@cochise said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486193) said:
@hank37w said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486188) said:
If we possessed any sort of negotiating skills, I'm sure we could have got Dane early. The stupidity in us rating Momo as #4 centre was way off.

The discussions for Dane were going for over 3 months and Penrith had no intention of releasing him early, we did very well to get him. Look at the Dogs who a lot of people laud for their recruitment at the moment, they were unable to get Burton out of the Panthers in a similar situation.

But without Momiroski did you see Penrith using Daine at all this season?
They had / have Sunai Turiava coming through who played the full season at fullback in NSW cup. By giving us Dane for Momos they got a capable player in a position they didn’t have a lot of depth in yet they would of stunted the development of their rookie fullback and also had been short a centre. (Considering Burton played out the year as one of them).
I’m not unhappy with the end result but. I’m not 100% convinced Penrith had plans for Daine after we had signed him and therefore they probably got the better end of the bargain; at least in the short term.
Long term we won out.

I think he would have been used at some point, there was a fair bit of talk early that Burton wouldn't get a lot of game time this season. 5 or so rounds in the Dogs were still trying to get him across. I can tell you with 100% confidence that Penrith didn't want to let Laurie go for this season.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486146) said:
@harvey said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486114) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485931) said:
@plisskin said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485806) said:
@jirskyr That is not the point.
Fans on here were labelling him useless.
3 out of the past 4 premiership coaches disagree.

The insinuation I’m reading throughout is that tigers (and Madge to suit a narrative) were labelling him useless by offering him for the trade.

You can trade someone and value them at the same time.

They picked BJ, Roberts and Talau ahead of him. Valued like the 5c piece you walk past rather than wasting your time picking it up

The choice wasnt BJ, Roberts, Talau or Momo.

The choice was Laurie or Momo.

No it wasn’t.
It was trade Momo to get Laurie early.
 
@cochise said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486213) said:
@needaname said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486209) said:
@cochise said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486193) said:
@hank37w said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486188) said:
If we possessed any sort of negotiating skills, I'm sure we could have got Dane early. The stupidity in us rating Momo as #4 centre was way off.

The discussions for Dane were going for over 3 months and Penrith had no intention of releasing him early, we did very well to get him. Look at the Dogs who a lot of people laud for their recruitment at the moment, they were unable to get Burton out of the Panthers in a similar situation.

But without Momiroski did you see Penrith using Daine at all this season?
They had / have Sunai Turiava coming through who played the full season at fullback in NSW cup. By giving us Dane for Momos they got a capable player in a position they didn’t have a lot of depth in yet they would of stunted the development of their rookie fullback and also had been short a centre. (Considering Burton played out the year as one of them).
I’m not unhappy with the end result but. I’m not 100% convinced Penrith had plans for Daine after we had signed him and therefore they probably got the better end of the bargain; at least in the short term.
Long term we won out.

I think he would have been used at some point, there was a fair bit of talk early that Burton wouldn't get a lot of game time this season. 5 or so rounds in the Dogs were still trying to get him across. I can tell you with 100% confidence that Penrith didn't want to let Laurie go for this season.

Confidence or assurance?
 
@cochise said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486193) said:
@hank37w said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486188) said:
If we possessed any sort of negotiating skills, I'm sure we could have got Dane early. The stupidity in us rating Momo as #4 centre was way off.

The discussions for Dane were going for over 3 months and Penrith had no intention of releasing him early, we did very well to get him. Look at the Dogs who a lot of people laud for their recruitment at the moment, they were unable to get Burton out of the Panthers in a similar situation.

We didn’t win on the trade, Penrith did.
 
@hank37w said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486188) said:
If we possessed any sort of negotiating skills, I'm sure we could have got Dane early. The stupidity in us rating Momo as #4 centre was way off.

Like Penrith let Burton go to dogs?
 
@the_patriot said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486194) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486146) said:
@harvey said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486114) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485931) said:
@plisskin said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485806) said:
@jirskyr That is not the point.
Fans on here were labelling him useless.
3 out of the past 4 premiership coaches disagree.

The insinuation I’m reading throughout is that tigers (and Madge to suit a narrative) were labelling him useless by offering him for the trade.

You can trade someone and value them at the same time.

They picked BJ, Roberts and Talau ahead of him. Valued like the 5c piece you walk past rather than wasting your time picking it up

The choice wasnt BJ, Roberts, Talau or Momo.

The choice was Laurie or Momo.

That wasn't the choice that was the decision.

And it was a poor one. We could have kept him and still got Laurie. Well run clubs would have.

Like Penrith letting Burton go?
 
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486225) said:
@the_patriot said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486194) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486146) said:
@harvey said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486114) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485931) said:
@plisskin said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485806) said:
@jirskyr That is not the point.
Fans on here were labelling him useless.
3 out of the past 4 premiership coaches disagree.

The insinuation I’m reading throughout is that tigers (and Madge to suit a narrative) were labelling him useless by offering him for the trade.

You can trade someone and value them at the same time.

They picked BJ, Roberts and Talau ahead of him. Valued like the 5c piece you walk past rather than wasting your time picking it up

The choice wasnt BJ, Roberts, Talau or Momo.

The choice was Laurie or Momo.

That wasn't the choice that was the decision.

And it was a poor one. We could have kept him and still got Laurie. Well run clubs would have.

Like Penrith letting Burton go?

What does Burton have to do with it?
That was on the Bulldogs who are also poor negotiators to sort out.
 
@the_patriot said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486194) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486146) said:
@harvey said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486114) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485931) said:
@plisskin said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485806) said:
@jirskyr That is not the point.
Fans on here were labelling him useless.
3 out of the past 4 premiership coaches disagree.

The insinuation I’m reading throughout is that tigers (and Madge to suit a narrative) were labelling him useless by offering him for the trade.

You can trade someone and value them at the same time.

They picked BJ, Roberts and Talau ahead of him. Valued like the 5c piece you walk past rather than wasting your time picking it up

The choice wasnt BJ, Roberts, Talau or Momo.

The choice was Laurie or Momo.

That wasn't the choice that was the decision.

And it was a poor one. We could have kept him and still got Laurie. Well run clubs would have.

Panthers wanted a trade for getting Laurie early. We offered cash, they declined. I believe we also offered to trade Cini, which they declined. Momirovski was the trade Penrith accepted.

I'd do that deal every day of the week to get Daine Laurie a year early. He would not have played much FG in 2021, so he would have come to us in 2022 still very underdone, particularly because State Cup was cancelled.

It boggles my mind that people think clubs can just get what they want FROM THEIR OPPONENTS because they are a good club or bad club. You need to have something to trade, and it's clear as day that Tigers will struggle to offer Panthers something (that we are willing to part with) when Panthers are one of the best sides going around.
 
@jirskyr said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486289) said:
@the_patriot said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486194) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486146) said:
@harvey said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486114) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485931) said:
@plisskin said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485806) said:
@jirskyr That is not the point.
Fans on here were labelling him useless.
3 out of the past 4 premiership coaches disagree.

The insinuation I’m reading throughout is that tigers (and Madge to suit a narrative) were labelling him useless by offering him for the trade.

You can trade someone and value them at the same time.

They picked BJ, Roberts and Talau ahead of him. Valued like the 5c piece you walk past rather than wasting your time picking it up

The choice wasnt BJ, Roberts, Talau or Momo.

The choice was Laurie or Momo.

That wasn't the choice that was the decision.

And it was a poor one. We could have kept him and still got Laurie. Well run clubs would have.

Panthers wanted a trade for getting Laurie early. We offered cash, they declined. I believe we also offered to trade Cini, which they declined. Momirovski was the trade Penrith accepted.

I'd do that deal every day of the week to get Daine Laurie a year early. He would not have played much FG in 2021, so he would have come to us in 2022 still very underdone, particularly because State Cup was cancelled.

It boggles my mind that people think clubs can just get what they want FROM THEIR OPPONENTS because they are a good club or bad club. You need to have something to trade, and it's clear as day that Tigers will struggle to offer Panthers something (that we are willing to part with) when Panthers are one of the best sides going around.

Trades are a new idea in the NRL. Unfortunately we suck at them.
 
@the_patriot said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486300) said:
@jirskyr said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486289) said:
@the_patriot said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486194) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486146) said:
@harvey said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486114) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485931) said:
@plisskin said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485806) said:
@jirskyr That is not the point.
Fans on here were labelling him useless.
3 out of the past 4 premiership coaches disagree.

The insinuation I’m reading throughout is that tigers (and Madge to suit a narrative) were labelling him useless by offering him for the trade.

You can trade someone and value them at the same time.

They picked BJ, Roberts and Talau ahead of him. Valued like the 5c piece you walk past rather than wasting your time picking it up

The choice wasnt BJ, Roberts, Talau or Momo.

The choice was Laurie or Momo.

That wasn't the choice that was the decision.

And it was a poor one. We could have kept him and still got Laurie. Well run clubs would have.

Panthers wanted a trade for getting Laurie early. We offered cash, they declined. I believe we also offered to trade Cini, which they declined. Momirovski was the trade Penrith accepted.

I'd do that deal every day of the week to get Daine Laurie a year early. He would not have played much FG in 2021, so he would have come to us in 2022 still very underdone, particularly because State Cup was cancelled.

It boggles my mind that people think clubs can just get what they want FROM THEIR OPPONENTS because they are a good club or bad club. You need to have something to trade, and it's clear as day that Tigers will struggle to offer Panthers something (that we are willing to part with) when Panthers are one of the best sides going around.

Trades are a new idea in the NRL. Unfortunately we suck at them.

Harry Grant waves hello.
 
@the_patriot said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486300) said:
@jirskyr said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486289) said:
@the_patriot said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486194) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486146) said:
@harvey said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486114) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485931) said:
@plisskin said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1485806) said:
@jirskyr That is not the point.
Fans on here were labelling him useless.
3 out of the past 4 premiership coaches disagree.

The insinuation I’m reading throughout is that tigers (and Madge to suit a narrative) were labelling him useless by offering him for the trade.

You can trade someone and value them at the same time.

They picked BJ, Roberts and Talau ahead of him. Valued like the 5c piece you walk past rather than wasting your time picking it up

The choice wasnt BJ, Roberts, Talau or Momo.

The choice was Laurie or Momo.

That wasn't the choice that was the decision.

And it was a poor one. We could have kept him and still got Laurie. Well run clubs would have.

Panthers wanted a trade for getting Laurie early. We offered cash, they declined. I believe we also offered to trade Cini, which they declined. Momirovski was the trade Penrith accepted.

I'd do that deal every day of the week to get Daine Laurie a year early. He would not have played much FG in 2021, so he would have come to us in 2022 still very underdone, particularly because State Cup was cancelled.

It boggles my mind that people think clubs can just get what they want FROM THEIR OPPONENTS because they are a good club or bad club. You need to have something to trade, and it's clear as day that Tigers will struggle to offer Panthers something (that we are willing to part with) when Panthers are one of the best sides going around.

Trades are a new idea in the NRL. Unfortunately we suck at them.

Exactly how many trade deals have been done in the NRL the past 3-4 seasons, for a point of comparison?
 
@hank37w said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486200) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486191) said:
@hank37w said in [Paul Momirovski](/post/1486188) said:
If we possessed any sort of negotiating skills, I'm sure we could have got Dane early. The stupidity in us rating Momo as #4 centre was way off.

Who says we did?

The business about Momo being told that he was rated behind BJ, JTJ and Tommy, I think was fairly widely reported on here and in the media.

I think we just need to agree to disagree on this one, but *the main point I have been trying to push* is that Momo would have been our best centre and not by a short margin.

This I can agree with you on. There is no doubt IMO Momo would have been our best option for centre. First centre picked.

IMO our team is stronger with Laurie at 1 and Momo absent than Momo at centre and Laurie absent
 

Latest posts

Back
Top